Discussion Board

IMAGES: Pomp and pageantry of the Royal Procession


Total 51 messages Pages | 1 | 2 | 3   Older >
Patriot
Wate of time.. Poor coverage by BBC
by Patriot on May 01, 2011 02:15 PM

the coverage done by BBC is mere waste,,as they never bothered to show the delegates (from all over the world they said!!)whoever attended the extra-vaganza......Waste of time... Hope this Willi will satisfy her unlike his dad done to his mom ( Run-away mom!!)... All the best

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Abraham
Poor William!
by Abraham on May 01, 2011 12:55 AM

Your wife will be eloping with a stronger dinger-banger Muslim guy within 7 years- I bet 1 British stupid pound on it.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
Eran
Re: Mossad
by Eran on Apr 30, 2011 08:21 PM
UAEs & Omans Terrroirst are slave of China & by product of Eran Ormy!!

Communist China is purchasing Biilions of Dollar Oil form UAEs & Omans.

Communist China is running these countries.

In turn china is exporting all the goods what the Uaes & Omans want to eat & live.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
Message deleted by moderator
Ajit Birdi
Re: PRINCESS IS BEAUTIFUL
by Ajit Birdi on May 01, 2011 02:36 AM
Our Bollywood-Kat is much prettier then this-Kat.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Ajit Birdi
Re: PRINCESS IS BEAUTIFUL
by Ajit Birdi on May 01, 2011 02:37 AM
No come and suck mine Rediff.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Abraham
Re: PRINCESS IS BEAUTIFUL
by Abraham on May 01, 2011 12:52 AM
Certainly not you! But I can see so many pretty Indian girls who can more than match her in looks.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
bhawani rathore
ceremony
by bhawani rathore on Apr 30, 2011 12:18 PM

there is no kissing ceremony in public during marriage in india?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
Hayat Ahmad
Re: India was Much Better Under British
by Hayat Ahmad on Apr 30, 2011 12:15 PM
if u see "dog and indians are not allowed" banner.. then u will change ur views... whatever we are today.. we are proud of it as Indians... and the things u listed as achievements of Britisg Raj were their need to lead a country...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Dr Love
Re: Re: India was Much Better Under British
by Dr Love on Apr 30, 2011 12:23 PM
Hayat@ u r right... absolutely right... every citizen of our country must learn the history of India... and then he will not post such comments in favour of british... they give us some systems true.. because they want to lead this country but in return.. they took the wealth and harmony of this country.. and leave this conutry in jeopardy at independance.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Rrrr
Re: Re: India was Much Better Under British
by Rrrr on Apr 30, 2011 12:25 PM
dog and indians are not allowed" banner still exist in present day india and that too legally provided by constitution of India

reservation is a clear example where a student getting 60% gets admission in medical or engineering whereas a student geting 85% does not

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Dr Love
Re: Re: Re: India was Much Better Under British
by Dr Love on Apr 30, 2011 12:28 PM
its different issue al together.. dont try to correlate with the discussion...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Rrrr
Re: Re: Re: Re: India was Much Better Under British
by Rrrr on Apr 30, 2011 12:34 PM
Mr Love how is is diff issue altogether can u explain
1st of all can u explain what exactly is democracy before we debate further?

Indian constitution still has categorised a section of society as dogs and deprived them from govt jobs/education based on reservation
even during election specific areas r reserved for certain category ?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Mohit Gupta
Re: India was Much Better Under British
by Mohit Gupta on Apr 30, 2011 12:19 PM
If you really think that India was better under British then I have some facts for you.And this is from WIKIPEDIA which says,

"For the next 1500 years, India produced its classical civilizations such as the Rashtrakutas, Hoysalas and Western Gangas. During this period India is estimated to have had the largest economy of the ancient and medieval world between the 1st and 17th centuries AD, controlling between one third and one fourth of the world's wealth up to the time of the Marathas, from whence it rapidly declined during European rule."

So its enough evidence to clear misconception of some people that India was better under British.

For , all the problems regarding corruption and all , only WE are to be blamed and only we have to eradicate it , but these problems are not exclusive for India.This is a world phenomenon.



   Forward   |   Report abuse
Rrrr
Re: Re: India was Much Better Under British
by Rrrr on Apr 30, 2011 12:40 PM
During this period India is estimated to have had the largest economy of the ancient and medieval world between the 1st and 17th centuries AD, controlling between one third and one fourth of the world's wealth up to the time of the Marathas, from whence it rapidly declined during European rule."

wrong fact Mr Gupta i dont know what histiory have u studied?

Mugal & Islami presence came much before the marathas and european presence....

Marathas gave a tough fight to mugals head on from Shivaji to Bajirao Peshwa till the last battle of panipat
British Virtually took India from Marathas .....

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Dr Love
Re: Re: India was Much Better Under British
by Dr Love on Apr 30, 2011 12:26 PM
true Mohit... u n Hayat r true Indians...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Bingo
Royal Wedding..
by Bingo on Apr 30, 2011 12:07 PM

Is a deliberate act to attract tourist across the globe....Good work by British tourist organisation...

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 51 messages Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3   Older >
Write a message