If Chandrababu Naidu's wealth is just 12 crores as per his affidavit to Election Commission, How could he pay 20 crores to Stanford University for his son Lokesh's admission?
Re: And
by National Highway on Apr 17, 2011 12:13 AM
20cr = 4 million $ or 0.4cr $ Studying degree and MBA may cost about 0.25 million or 250,000$ (50K$per year) even if someone live lavishly in US.
If Chandrababu Naidu's wealth is just 12 crores as per his affidavit to Election Commission, How could he pay 20 crores to Stanford University for his son Lokesh's admission?
If Chandrababu Naidu's wealth is just 12 crores as per his affidavit to Election Commission, How could he pay 20 crores to Stanford University for his son Lokesh's admission?
I am neither a supporter nor an opponent of Jagan.When it comes to an objective assessment,we need to be fair to every one.If Jagan's is a money politics,what about those of the Congress & TDP?Are the not blackmailing politics?Can any political leader irrespective of the party to which it belongs say that all his earnings or whatever the properties they hold in their names/benami are really earned with their sweatling & legally?And when YSR was alive, every one's knowledge that he was the chief fund riser for Congress.Where have all these morals & value preachings have gone at that time?No doubt,YSR & his supporters amassed wealth in all possible ways,did any of the leaders who ruled the roost was not corrupt?Barring a very few like Nanda, LalBahadur Sastry,Vajpayee & Manmohan Singh, all the politicians were/are corrupt.It is only the degree that differs. Yes,admittedly, whatever Jagan has declared could only be a tip of the iceberk,but if a thorough probe is ordered, will whatever is declared by all other politicians match with their actual holdings or with the market value?To the extent that Jagan declared such an amazing quantum,which made all other politicians raise their eye brows,he needs to be complimented All said & done,late YSR believed in the theory of "live & let live" while his other contemporary politicians were only for living themselves exclusi
Re: Impartially spkg
by National Highway on Apr 17, 2011 12:21 AM
Agreed, there are no saints in politics. So we have to choose the lesser evil. Jagan is definitely not the lesser evil.
This money is received from abroad for Christian conversion. Actually ke did not spend that much and trickled it into his wealth of 460 Cr. So how much would have been received by him for conversion from abroad? I bet Sonia knew this and that's why Jagan got expelled.
Only 10% can be kept by Chief agent.5% to minister, 5% to babus, 5% to others (thugs etc). Balance goes to boss. So you can imaging how much went to Switzerland when this is only declared part.
Why ask Jagan to explain phenomenal increase in his asset? We need to ask senior politicians in country what example they have set and why they are opposed to Lokpal Bill that has the potential to nail them. The corruption is root cause of all miseries in our country starting with stark poverty (40% of us live below poverty line), lack of speedier economic growth to terrorist attacks with impunity (Terrorists from out side can’t have their way with out the support of local people who are easily bought over). Why blame any one indulging in corrupt practices when heads of family (senior politicians) themselves are corrupt? Perhaps only exception being Nitish Kumar and Narendra Mody. No effort was made immediately after independence to build national character and educate masses.
Perhaps Lord Krishna descended indirectly on earth in the form of Anna Hazare!
Why ask Jagan to explain phenomenal increase in his asset? We need to ask senior politicians in country what example they have set and why they are opposed to Lokpal Bill that has the potential to nail them. The corruption is root cause of all miseries in our country starting with stark poverty (40% of us live below poverty line), lack of speedier economic growth to terrorist attacks with impunity (Terrorists from out side can’t have their way with out the support of local people who are easily bought over). Why blame any one indulging in corrupt practices when heads of family (senior politicians) themselves are corrupt? Perhaps only exception being Nitish Kumar and Narendra Mody. No effort was made immediately after independence to build national character and educate masses.
Perhaps Lord Krishna descended indirectly on earth in the form of Anna Hazare!
Re: Why blame Jagan now?
by Sekar on Apr 16, 2011 08:49 PM
Leave Jagan in A.P. In T.N., one DMK contestant has declared his wealth at 7 crores and Deputy C.M. Stalin has declared at 2 crores.
IN TAMIL NADU EACH AND EVERY MININSTER GOT MORE THAN THE ASSETS DECLARED BY JAGAN, ALL HIDED, THEN WHAT ABOUT 176000 CRORE LOOTED BY CONGRESS PARTY IN ALLIANCE WITH DMK
Re: jagan being discriminated against
by Mathew Mathews on Apr 16, 2011 08:46 PM
What has christian name got to do with anything? Do you mean to say being christian is a dis qualification in political life?
Re: Re: jagan being discriminated against
by shilpy on Apr 17, 2011 09:27 AM
touchy touchy, are we? come on, he is running for a public office. he must declare his assets, and his identity. the people have a right to know.
