nothing to say now let us see the court judgement and let people to react naturally with their own instinct . I am fail to understand why such disputes are alwasy happens in the congress regieme..?
Re: Re: ayodhya verdict
by sanjay khambe on Sep 30, 2010 02:47 PM
you wrong, let me point out that it was only bjp efforts that india is acclaimed internationalyy due to bjp only.otherwise we were not having any identity.....they can do lot more....mind it...it is the paertuy of differnce...doesnt..divide n rule like congies n alll..
Re: Re: Re: ayodhya verdict
by savy khanuja on Sep 30, 2010 03:12 PM
"God also says that karma is much more important than worship hand" so again vote goes to good karma. Keeping this in mind govt should make decision by making orphanage/ Hospital/ Aged home or School.
Its non-sense to fight on land issues to buid temple or mosque. Just build one orphan house & ensure the correct growth to them..Thats a real dharma...
Re: Ayodhya Dispute
by moonis khan on Sep 30, 2010 02:44 PM
Thats really the best alternative build some orphan house or hospital on the disputed land. Building a mosque or temple will not resolve the matter.
Re: Re: Ayodhya Dispute
by Arun Kumar Bhuyan on Sep 30, 2010 02:55 PM
this is not issue of temple or mosque this is an issue of hinduism. can muslin allow hindu to place the statute of ram inside a mosque ? if no...! why hindu will tolerate.
Re: Re: Ayodhya Dispute
by Vasant Sivashanmugam on Sep 30, 2010 02:48 PM
How about a Cricket Stadium or better still a Games village (on the lines of CWG)?
Re: Ayodhya Dispute
by Chandrasekar Srinivasan on Sep 30, 2010 02:46 PM
Your thot is appreciated, but cannot be accepted. Lets say some goons come to your house and threw you out. Both of you fight for years and go to court. Will you accept the verdict to demolish your house (now disputed) and build a school or hospital... No... you would not
Same is the case with Ayodhya.
More so ever, will you be prepared to destroy every temple,church,mosque, and build a school
There are thousand places for school/hospital and u cannot reclaim this disputed land which belonged to Shri Ram.
Re: Re: Ayodhya Dispute
by Chandrasekar Srinivasan on Sep 30, 2010 02:52 PM
and today ayodhya tomorrow Shro ranganath temple shrirangam next day kasi viswanath temple
some one drew a cartoon on prphoet and there was Fatwa on multiple nation some scholl baned the fellow citizen no to sing Bande mataram.
but some artist can draw bharat mata, hindu goddess in obsecene and thats appreciated.
sorry folk, Hindus cannot be tolerant at all times.
you may call me fanatic or what ever, but reality is, in my own country majority are considered fools in all aspects right from owning land, education, jobs and have to succumb.
Re: Re: Ayodhya Dispute
by snehal on Sep 30, 2010 02:52 PM
u r right sir..well explained. but the point is that this issue is giving too much of tension and should be closed as unsolved...and both parties should agree in the interest of the nation rather than making it a prestige point..
Re: Re: Re: Ayodhya Dispute
by khairnar on Sep 30, 2010 03:07 PM
Issue was already solved in 1947. If anybody doesnot respect majority communities feelings and culture, they had freedom to live India. However, if then anybody interested to live in India, then they should not behave like an enemey of this country and love to their another country which is happening in India and it is the main root of Ayodhya type disputes also.
Re: Re: Ayodhya Dispute
by savy khanuja on Sep 30, 2010 03:06 PM
I feet that 15 years is too long time to take this decision, however instead of making any temple or mosque govt should make orphanage/ hospital / school or aged home.
The ruler of Indonesia,biggest muslim nation,named her daughter as Meghawati(a hindu name)as advised by his friend Mr. Biju Patnaik,the then CM of Orisa. Religion is a way to make friends for wise and a tool of destruction for others,rightly said by Mr. Kalam.
Re: Need for mature thinking
by keesari reddy on Sep 30, 2010 02:51 PM
Brother, these sweet words do not work with these mujjzzis. Forget kashmir,just go to any part of hydrabad old city and try to preach them with these words!!you'l find the truth in my words.
Re: Need for mature thinking
by shaank on Sep 30, 2010 02:46 PM
it needs 2 2 tango,what u say is idealistic ,where is any example or precedence of a gesture in india in respecting a matter of faith, it needs two hands 2 clap not one....
Re: AYODHYA
by dinesh mishra on Sep 30, 2010 02:50 PM
Dear Pradeep. Let us discuss with small Example. Suppose you are a house owner and don't want to keep any tenant (Kirayedar). If some ZARURATMAND will come and request you to provide him your some rooms on rental basis for few days or months. After completion of his tenure if he claimed that that rooms (which had you provided on rental basis) were his own property. What will you do ? Request him (dono haath jodkar) that vacant his rooms? Handover your rooms to police for solving problem ? Launch a court case on him?
Re: AYODHYA
by keesari reddy on Sep 30, 2010 02:54 PM
with following conditions, 1.dress: black,green and orange 2.They should not wear footware 3.They should not take liquor 4.Every friday and saturday they should pray god and so on
Re: Re: Nutral Judgement required
by Santhosh Rathnam on Sep 30, 2010 02:42 PM
It doesnt matter if he is a hindu or a muslim. What he says is in the best interest of everyone.
I think Indian Govt. is fooling poor in this country. Bcuz presently in India more poor people are living under salary Rs. 3,000 per month with no other facilities. Why not invest this Rs. 70,000 Crs project in given some facilities to poor people in India. like free hospitals, pension, donation, Loans, Jobs etc
Re: Why Indian Govt. Invest Rs. 70,000 Crs in CWG ?
by itz Scorpion on Sep 30, 2010 02:06 PM
If Indian govt. invest this 70,000 Crs money to serve poor people of India. Then I am 90% sure CRIME will be finish in India.
Re: Re: Re: Why Indian Govt. Invest Rs. 70,000 Crs in CWG ?
by Tarlenanmaga on Sep 30, 2010 02:47 PM
@ omanchandy Dalit raj... what a joke, when Dr. Ambedkar instituted the reservation for the SC/ST he clearly specified that these benefits to be restricted to the stipulated time. But these SC/ST even after 60 years want the benefits and want to eat the india's tax payers money. people like you creamy layer dalits only crib but you your self never tried to embrace the down trodden dalits.
please dont brand one caste or religion or individuals or groups as wrong, check yours first and comment on others
