The role of the judiciary is to pronounce a verdict based on the truth and not to find a position of compromise. The verdict does not pronounce judgement on those responsible for the destruction of the mosque, therby justifying the wrongdoers.
But more importantly it missed the fundamental question. The verdict takes into account popular perception that Ram was born in Ayodhya, but where is proof that Ram even existed?
Buiding of Ram Mandir is necessary for India to remain a democratic and Secular Nation. So far India remained a secular country becasue of majarity of Hindus. If the ratio would have been reverse, the situation would have been different. Now it for the court's to respect the sentiments of Hindus and give the verdict in favour of Hindus. As minority Indian Muslims are more safe in India than any corner of the world and Islamic countries. They have more freedom than the Islamic Nations. Hindus have shown their patients for the lasst sixy years and Courts have tested the patients of Hindus by giving no decesion on this very delicate issue. Now Muslims should come forward with open heart and allow Hindus to build Ram Mandir at Ayodhya Ramjanmabhumi. It is in the interst of the Nation.
Re: Building of Ram Mandir is needed ///
by Indian Citizen on Sep 27, 2010 02:17 PM
Not 60 yers but 350 years of patience. If there is a yeild point of no return by judial process going against, I doubt if this country remains then Secular.
Re: Building of Ram Mandir is needed ///
by huma siddiqui on Sep 27, 2010 03:38 PM
Don't give verdict in favour of any religion. Lets favour humanity and make a hospital which has a temple,mosque,church and gurudwara.
Re: Re: Building of Ram Mandir is needed ///
by prasad kv on Sep 27, 2010 04:41 PM
but however, Indian is called as Hindustan....... better keep in mind
