This man has no place in any part of India;he should be kicked out of India.
He has no business to say J & K disputed area; he is no body to this issue. Elected Govt.at J & K and at Center are the sole authority on this issue. They are the right people to talk and decide, what should be the course action.
If he is speaking on behalf of Pak\USA and China, he has no place with in the territory of India; he should get out rather then spreading rumour and creating commotion in the community.
Govt. must slap legal action on rumour mongers like him.
1> Jammu and Ladakh completely integrated with India. This is the cost of freedom to Hurriyat
2> Valley has self rule. It doesnt pay tax to India but gets financial assistance. This is the model that works with Peurto Rico which is autonomous region of the US.
Now involve Pakistan and that bring complexity.
Pakistan would have to reciprocate the same on Azad kashmir or Gilgit/Baltistan.
The additional complexity as anyoone can imagine is how to supervise a territory which falls within India and Pakistan both. Now this makes the case unique and difficult to solve.
Today Peurto Rico wants to become 51st state of the US. Complexity and conflict would arise when later down the line, the autonomous Kashmir makes a decision to accede to India or Pakistan.
Re: Kashmiri solution
by Desert Fox on Sep 26, 2010 09:19 PM
But GoI never tried to change the demography of Kashmir in the last 50 years which nobody knows is a good thing or bad.
I fail to understand that when India is very clear that Kashmir is Inseperable part of the country, why the people like Geelani are not booked and prosccuted by the government for raising war against the union. Why NOT ??
Now the Government policies have allowed these people to be more and more vocal by every day. How can they openly defy the Government of India and still be allowed to roam free ??
Any answer to this by congiees ?? Or is it Once a Nehru always a Nehru ??
Why is it that only kashmiri muslims want freedom ? Don't you think you are communal and those who want the indian government including the present indian government is communal in that sense and hence you guys are nothing but muslim appeasers ?
Re: Question to congis and sickulars
by Indian on Sep 26, 2010 09:14 PM
and this guy compared himself with Gandhi in one of the replies to the chat questions. Hilarious !!
I think he forgot that Gandhi never fought for religion or territory of (say Gujrat) but for nationhood of the motherland called India. Seperatists are guiding the people of Kashmir into a dark pit like Pakistan and Aghanistan. Why don;t they first fight to bring the Kashimiri Pandits back and present some "confidence building measures" ??
Re: Re: Question to congis and sickulars
by Indian on Sep 26, 2010 10:35 PM
Insaan pathan - and now we are reping u in kashmir everyday. 105 dead and counting
Kashmiri-people only want Freedom from Indian Government. They does not want to live under either Indian govt. or Pakistani government. They only want free Kashmir from both sides. Then what is solution there? I think, only solution removal of article 370. Am I right.
I really doubt the collective IQ of these protesting Kashmiri people. Do they really know What do they want?
- Do they want to be part of Pakistan? Will any sane person these days want to part of a country that is breaking up day by day? Pakistanis abroad are so ashamed of their identity that they have started calling themselves as South Asians.
- If Kashmir is part of Pakistan, will any tourist step a foot there? What will they eat?
- Freedom? Can a landlocked country with no resources and without tourism, what will Azad Kashmiris live on?
- Don't they know the plight of people living on PoK? Don't they know what image Pakistan has in word forums?
- Don't they know how the world has preferred to look the other way when Pak went looking for aid for its flood affected millions? Don't they know the country they are dying to join is 'an international migraine'?
- Do they want to be part of a country that is living on alms? Does Kashmiriyat means losing your self-respect?
- Do they want to be just nominally independent? In these globalised flat word, can you afford to be independent with no income? with no resources? Will your religion give you food in this life?
- Just because of someone belongs to your religion, should this cloud your vision.
- Will their economy survive, especially considering that theirs is not a knowledge-driven society?
Azadi or joining Pak, either way, it is a lose-lose situation for Kashmiris.
Re: Low On IQ - These Protesters
by Insaan Pathani on Sep 26, 2010 10:26 PM
let us not wrong ourselves by raising silly questions. The answer could be,'THERE R SO MANY LAND-LOCKED COUNTRIES ALREDY SURVIVING IN THE WORlD'. The real question is Pakistan is really in mess of blood and Freedom from India may be a glamour but abolishing big and heavenly oppurtunities for Kashmiris.
Re: Re: Low On IQ - These Protesters
by Indian on Sep 26, 2010 10:37 PM
u won't get in ur lifetimes a chance to see a free kashmir. now , get ready for some backlash. We in India are not going to give kashmiri mozzies any jobs..u'll live on our mercey and wait for BJP govt to come...we are going to kill ur youth, ur old, ur women and ur kids..
