Re: ha ha ..
by JaiHanumaan on Sep 16, 2010 01:01 PM
the true meaning of what hxinxduixsm means .. is being dixstorxted in prexsentxatixon by wexstexrn minded sxecuxlxar men of india .. hinxduixsm is rooted in dxhxarxma .. and wexstexrn whxite men and their cxivxilizxatixon represent nothing but axdhxarxma .. in every aspect of life ..
Re: Hindus in U.S.A.
by Vivek Dev on Sep 16, 2010 01:05 PM
Let us hope this never happens. Indians are caste racists, they discriminate on the basis of colour, sex, religion, caste, sub caste, sub sub caste, even dietary preferences. US Black community will be worst hit if Indian becomes US prez as Indians hate black skin.
Re: Re: Hindus in U.S.A.
by Manjunath on Sep 16, 2010 02:11 PM
Then debate will start which Hindu a Brahmin or Yadav or Kayastha or Purohit or Kshatriya etc etc etc
Piyush Jindal changed his name to Bobby Jindal,converted self and family to Catholic faith and supported the cranky religious groups in their belief against Darwin's theory. This is assimilation for a politically ambitious Hindu.We shuld not complain.
Re: Assimilation
by Vivek Dev on Sep 16, 2010 01:07 PM
Jindal should be role model for all Hindus who want to take up US citizenship. Hindus will be able to better assimilate in US society if they accept Christianity.
Re: Re: Assimilation
by this that on Sep 16, 2010 05:04 PM
OK RICEBAG STOP BLABBERING.
USA IS NOT LIKE INDIA WHERE HINDUS HAVE TO BE ANTI HINDU TO BE ACCEPTABLE FOR 'SECULAR PEOPLE' WHO ARE IN TERN ALL COMMUNAL THEMSELVES AND BELIEVE IN GOD AS PROPERTY OF RELIGION AND SLAVERY OF OTHERS.
USA IS A PLACE WHERE HINDUS CAN RISE BEING HINDU THEMSELVES AND NOT OTHERWISE.
