Re: What he meant to say is...
by KK on Oct 25, 2010 03:54 PM
you have got majority you will say it.HINDUTVA has to sold for that you can sell your moder and cuntry.
A few weeks ago, Prashant Bhushan said in an interview that certain chief justices have indulged in “corrupt practices”. He dared the court to try him for contempt. A senior Supreme Court lawyer, Harish Salve, moved the court for initiating contempt proceedings against Prashant. The court issued a notice.
Nothing happened for many days. Shanti Bhushan followed the son and said in the court of the chief justice that certain retired chief justices were corrupt and submitted a sealed envelope to the chief justice of India, S.H. Kapadia. Shanti Bhushan challenged the court to proceed against him for contempt of court.
Prashant has now given details of transactions which the alleged corrupt chief justices are supposed to have indulged in. Some of these instances have been publicised earlier and the judges were generally exonerated. However, the surprising part is the stark silence of the Supreme Court.
A famous retired Supreme Court judge, Krishna Iyer, has demanded in an article that Shanti Bhushan and Prashant Bhushan be punished for making “false charges” or their allegations must be scrutinised by an independent authority. He has, in fact, tried to expand the case by demanding a probe into the charges against other judges.
The chief justice has remained quiet. No newspaper has followed up on the allegations. No television network has picked up the story. What surprises me is the lack of reaction either fro
Re: Hey Muslims will always be winner over Hindoos
by KK on Oct 25, 2010 03:56 PM
HOW RSS goels harass and place $hit for fooling majority to be power centric always.
If the SANGH PARIVAR and THE MUSLIM ORGANIZATIONS agree, the following resolution should be the best in the national and communities interest. (i) Let Ram Mandir be built in the same vicinity of the Ram Janambhoomi site along with Babri Masjid. No structure should be on the disputed Masjid location. (ii) Both structures should be built by providing at least Rs. 100 crores government fund to each and both the facilities should have common public facilities for all Indians to learn each others religion, culture, including Arabic, Urdu and Sanskrit languages. (iii) All religious festivals should be celebrated on grand scale inviting every one to take part. (iv) The Constitution should be changed to make it clear that no more Temple or Masjid should be demolished if it is older than 25 years.
The Allahabad High Court verdict of Sept.30, 2010 on Babri Masjid cannot be accepted. Because it is based on myths (superstitions) and not on verified historical facts. Can a court verdict based on faith and beliefs that kill science, rationalism, progress? That is why Brahminical forces are naturally rejoicing over the verdict because it has suffered a criminal blow inflicted on the historical rights of Muslims — paving the way to declare India a Ram Rajya.We have no hope of the ruling Brahminists accepting the constitution of India.
Re: brhmncl wolves
by Bharath Varsh on Oct 23, 2010 11:15 PM
The real myth is the 12th century doctrine founded by a lunatic who is fit to be thrown into asylum. That is the cause of all the problems.
Re: Re: brhmncl wolves
by ashok bajpai on Oct 24, 2010 12:17 AM
i am sure u have not read it.izlm is part of history not mythology.everything is recorded.
