Where were Secular congress and Secular Media particularly NDTV,IBN,Barkha dutta when imam thrashed a media person for asking question on Ram temple/mosque?Where were media when the hand of a professor was chopped in Kerala ? No debate was done.It all show that the all so called secularist parties and paid media try to put minorities to live in medieval age and not compete with main stream.Minorities will always be treated as vote bank.Minorities should think now and come out from the clutch of pscheodo secular parties.
Re: Where were Secular congress and Secular Media
by Shreeharsha Hegde on Oct 19, 2010 03:41 PM
attitude of Bukhari clearly shows ..to what extent he is misguiding the muzlims inIndia
Secular terrorists (NDTV, CNN IBN,congees ) are all busy trying to Capture Bihar....they cant see Bihar getting developed. if the people get educated and economically self sustained ...congees and siculars will lose the power and status.
Illiteracy and poverty ...traditionaly WON votes for Congress
Re: What terrorist will become when they are old.
by Supersecualirist on Oct 19, 2010 11:12 AM
It is not a joke. The system truly works that way only. The successor to the present Imam is always selected and the selected one will have to have all the (hate) qualities which the present Imam holds. And the succession continues.
You should not be punishing us for the crimes that Babar committed. BUT we will keep the loot that Babar did. This is the simple logic of Bukhari and Wakf Board.
Re: Simple Logic
by SHAN BAID on Oct 16, 2010 07:24 PM
The loot is one which is taken out of land and Babur remained here thereafter. so the so called loot is not actually loot but inheritence.comparing past events inpresent is simply a farce and a means to release frustration
Re: Re: Simple Logic
by sanjoy basu on Oct 16, 2010 07:30 PM
Haha so if I loot your house and send it outside and then stay in your house it is ok? Then I will get title to your house?
Re: Re: Re: Simple Logic
by SHAN BAID on Oct 16, 2010 10:21 PM
Babur unlike nadirshah and ghaznavi won over the war and started ruling and remained here and didnot send the treasure outside.taking over weak dynasties was a common phenomenon in those days within this subcontinent as well. taking revenge for incapabilities of ancestors of medieval period from common musl1ms in modern world is nothing but an act of cowardice and frustration
Re: Re: Re: Simple Logic
by SHAN BAID on Oct 16, 2010 10:22 PM
Babur unlike nadirshah and ghaznavi won over the war and started ruling and remained here and didnot send the treasure outside.taking over weak dynasties was a common phenomenon in those days within this subcontinent as well. taking revenge for incapabilities of ancestors of medieval period from common musl1ms in modern world is nothing but an act of cowardice and frustration
Re: Re: Re: Re: Simple Logic
by Jay on Oct 17, 2010 12:00 PM
It's looking like your cinfusing in ur logic. The discussion is going on the original owner of land...and your clearly saying that Babar looted it frm Hindus itself...so it should return back to hindu right?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Simple Logic
by sanjoy basu on Oct 17, 2010 09:54 AM
You have same opinion about British? If they had refused to go they would have title and it is an act of cowardice to take revenge for what their ancestors did? By the way Babur was a coward. In many cases military strength and techniques are better in some people for a short people of time. So this coward attacked weaker people. Read his autobiography - he has contempt for India and Indians - which includes you I suppose? We should not make all descendents responsible but some historical wrongs should be corrected. Otherwise that is cowardice.
Mohammed Abdul Waheed Chisti is a very courageous person to actually raise such a question(Chisti asked the Shahi Imam to spell out his stand on the mention of King Dashrath's name in land records of 1528 before the Babri mosque was constructed) knowing that such things are not tolerated in his community. This is a point not even raised by the media or the juidiciary. Chisti should be applauded and shown as an example of real secular journalism and bravery.
Re: A Good Question by Chisti
by sanjoy basu on Oct 16, 2010 04:38 PM
Instructions must have come from the wahabi chaps in Saudi by fatwa that the community must deny anything that contradicts the view that Babur came from heaven and built the structure in a greenfield project..so this fellow has to obey. But he sure won brownie points by thrashing the journo
Re: See if muslims become majority in this country
by devedas bhaskar on Oct 16, 2010 04:36 PM
even without becoming majority they cut off the palm of a professor in kerala ostensibly for hurting their religious feelings...!!Isalm is a religion of PEACE or PIECES?
Re: Re: See if muslims become majority in this country
by SHAN BAID on Oct 16, 2010 07:17 PM
hope u have not forgotten attacks by babu bajrangi on xtian missionary (burnt alive in car)and burning ,looting ,raping of one community people under the shelter of govt machinary in guj
Re: Re: Re: See if muslims become majority in this country
by Supersecualirist on Oct 19, 2010 11:18 AM
This kind of illogical explanation is not going to help your cult people. Unless you introspect and take serious action to remove the objectionable material from the Book (to which your Mullahs will never agree because they will lose their hold on you people) bad times are ahead for all sections of society in India in the near future.
Please don't misunderstand the mad mullah.He was not in the news for quite some time.He was frustrated for that n was in search of an opportunity.When he got a chance he made best use of the same.
Re: Thrashing of a reporter
by sanjoy basu on Oct 16, 2010 11:08 AM
He is encouraged by some sick pseudo seculars. Today's paper carries a report of condemnation of the SC order by
this bukoo baby must booked for incitement and aggravated battery. clearly, this leader of islam is no man of peace, and has got too much islam in him.
