america is the biggest CAUSE and ROOT of letting the TERRORISM spread.......... if they want they can STOP the sale of arms from any country ...... but they dont want to do that.......... and we all know WHY.........
Re: Eliminate the Terror leadership
by Golden on Mar 03, 2010 08:41 PM
or I say, follow the Iranian way, even the super power who has enslaved india like country will fear you....cant do anything other than just crying sanction sanction...
Re: Re: Eliminate the Terror leadership
by Rakesh Sood on Mar 03, 2010 10:14 PM
GandooGolden, u can do what u want, evenShit in yourMullah's mouth. It is only your mentally unstable mind that says that Indians are slaves of US, It is not. For if at all, your failed nation Pak is the real slave for it begs from US and does what it is told to do like stray puppies. Else it wont get the doles.
On other hand, India does not begs but maintians decent relationship with USA for it is a fine country that has brought much prosperity to the world unlike your failed nation Pak which have brought ruin to the world and as for human growth, it is NIL.
Re: Eliminate the Terror leadership
by Mitto M on Mar 03, 2010 09:09 PM
I agree with R... but the issue is Indians attitude in day to day life is like a lady who have lots of ego. So how can they be strong in heart like Holy Land people?
Terrorism is now officially downgraded to liberlaised, privatised, globalised underworld.
Not to be given war status.
A modern "terrorist attack" is a very compelling sales campaign for the arms distribution and resale/wholesale industry.
Whoever is the distributor of goods, whoever is the wholesaler, the retailer, the industry is the same and the methods are the same.
All Indians thinking of war with Pakistan should understand that --
a war is a war when one country genuinely wants to annexe territory or capture people from another country for retaliation or similar political or social purposes.
When only a few 100 people of a country decide to start a war with the sole purpose of making PRIVATE profits from sale of arms for themselves and their family, friends and associates, it is only a distributorship, a wholesale business or a supply chain.
The Indian Govt is quite capable of understanding the difference between a war and a supply chain.
Even if the Supply Chain is disguised as a war!!!
You need military might to stop a war.
But you simply cannot stop a distributorship, a sales *business* with military might
BECAUSE IT IS NOT A WAR.
THE US AND ITS GOVT FOR ALL ITS INTELLECTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS, HAVE FAILED TO REALISE THAT THEY ARE BEING USED LIKE DISPOSABLE TOOLS by the MIC Arms companies to run a profitable supply chain in the guise of a war.
Russian President Vladimir Putin is also admirable for stepping back from Georgia for the very same reason.
Re: different names similar games - arms sales distributorship
by Devdutt Nayak on Mar 03, 2010 04:16 PM
That tiny nuisance of a politician, Mikhail Saakashvili, instigated Russia by attacking South Ossetia.
Russia initially deployed their military might to show Central Europe that it has sufficient life in it to prevent any mischief.
The important lesson is from what President Putin did after that - on his birthday, he released a video of himself playing Judo - what a vain thing to do - and added that, in Judo it is sometimes better to NOT strike if it ultimately weakens the enemy by not attacking him.
Inside a few days, Russian tanks unilaterally withdrew from Georgia, without a long war.
This helped Russia sustain it's oil businesses.
And this taught the Georgian public a big lesson - that they were fooled by Saakashvili's "patriotic" speeches which were just sales campaigns for American arms companies.
So Russia the Bear, practised Ahimsa, non-violence, and saved itself and its businesses.
So this is a lesson that must be remembered for centuries.
Similar story with Libyan Muammar Gaddafi. He is a nut case, an extremist and fundalmentalist. Yes.
But for Libyans he is king and patriotic.
He did the same - got nukes from the black market - but was caught - was about to face horrible sanctions and get caught in a war.
He turned in the nukes, scaled down the conflict and Libya averted a major conflict.
This means those wars were Arms sales campaigns, not wars !!!
Pak elite is the no.1 "dalal", supplier of Arms, Drugs.
A war has a start, a goal and an end. In the plan itself.
An arms sale distributorship, by definition, has NO END.
Hence, a war will stop if it is a war.
See the "Iraq and Afghanistan wars" by the US.
It is not a war because they have no decided plan or goal.
It is just dragging on and on and on because it is a market, it is sales, it is business, thriving with every bullet fired and every plane take-off and every bomb blast.
That is why technology wars will never end - they are never wars.
In fact, given the variety of problems man has created globally, there is no need for anyone to actually go to war with any country.
All countries can become self-reliant and progressive and profitable enough to not need war for windfall profits.
Yet, wars go on.
Because they are just ways to sell off arms stockpiles. The more technology advances, the more the reason NOT to go to war, but ironically, the more some people will make weapons and start wars with multiple long term implications.
So Gandhi's (feel free to totally hate him for what he did, but dont ignore his words - he was a Gujju Baniya by caste) Ahimsa was a strategic tool for the entire millenium to come - Ahimsa or non-violence is another word for Boycott Of Arms Industry - which will force the arms makers to turn away from those industries and take up better, cleaner businesses, which are also actually more profitable.
Gandhi was a great visionary Gujju BANIYA and yet Gujjus hate him - what a big mistake !!!!
It is futile for our security to blame Pakis when they have made it clear that they are going to attack us for 1000 years in a JIhaad. Why our security takes things lightly. Why were they not on guard. Do they expect luck to favour the dead when they deal with murdurers and criminals . Why was the secuity slack
I mean informers,,,,,but I think Indians are more busy in pleasing the minority and they are content in saying that Pakistan must do. Can somebody tell Indian army, what actually mean by defending the nation. I am so disturbed when a terrorists comes and kills few armymen and walk off,,,even in Sopor, Army shouldnt have lost those lives, but again I dont know who give the directives to Indian army of how to fight the terrorists..
Re: why not Indian army create its network in PoK
by Indian Rishi on Mar 03, 2010 03:35 PM
We vote for such parties who failed this nation for 60 years. We don't have right question them. They are dividing us in the name of caste, and minorities
Re: why not Indian army create its network in PoK
by abhipraya on Mar 03, 2010 03:25 PM
all these morons do not how to take on the terrorists... how many days we shud see this major killed, that soldier was martyred.. bu11sshittt... attack Porkistan and recapture the lost parts of Kashmir... fush out these i5lamic radicals.. sm0ke them out of their caves.... DO some PR0ACTIVE ACTION... DO OR DIE.. NOW OR NEVER...
Re: Re: why not Indian army create its network in PoK
by delguy on Mar 03, 2010 03:38 PM
I mean use the heavy guns and clear the mess,,,,,why loose the lives for these people,,,,,,
