no point in killing no 1 or 2, number dont go, some one else will be no 1 again. The key point is development in the rural areas, which will eradicate them.
Re: no point in killing no 1 or 2
by nishikant godbole on Jul 02, 2010 06:20 PM
Yes u r correct. But at the same time these Gundas who in the name of equlity kill innocent people should be killed in encounter fake or genuine.
Re: no point in killing no 1 or 2
by anup deshmukh on Jul 02, 2010 05:52 PM
I Disagree. Maosists have now lost the cause and are extortionists. There are vested interests in their existence. Those who pay them regularly do not face any trouble. It's a struggle of power and Maoists are now foot soldiers . Their handlers are MPs, Buearucrats, Ministers or businessmen. They will oppose any geniune development effort in rural areas because people for whom they say fight, will not even give a s@it to them.
Re: Re: no point in killing no 1 or 2
by ganajivenmanraj seven on Jul 02, 2010 06:01 PM
Thts correct. Maoists are scourge of our society and hence anyone abetting/supporting them is also anti national and needs to be eliminated. Azad is dead and he deserved death by a bullet. Bravo Police personnel who eliminated him. You pick up arms and go against the state then your end should be by a bullet. Hope he took the bullet on his chest and not his back. Otherwise its nothing but a display of maoist cowardice.
Whats wrong whether the encounter was genuine or fake? Vermins deserve no honor. Period. They tie the hands of their victims behind their backs and behead them like animals. These savages deserve no sympathy nor human rights coz they lost their right to all such claims when they crossed over to the other side.
Re: Hmmm
by kishor tatwawadi on Jul 02, 2010 05:23 PM
You are absolutely right. They should be killed in the same manner in which they kill innocent people.
Re: Re: Re: Hmmm
by nishikant godbole on Jul 02, 2010 06:29 PM
You have done a great research. Why drag brahmans in this? And who told you maoists are brahmins? Those who kill innocent people should be dealt with stronly irrespective of their caste and creed.
Re: Hmmm
by nishikant godbole on Jul 02, 2010 06:24 PM
The sympathy is shown by the media which is dirty game. Those who support the postmortem etc should also be procecuted but then all this requires strong will power which our leaders dont have.
Re: Re: Maoist leader
by anup deshmukh on Jul 02, 2010 05:55 PM
This strategy will not work in Chhatisgarh and Orissa as there is no political will for the same because of whch
If any criminals/terrorists/naxals are killed, it is always a fake encounter. If any police/crpf/soldier is killed, it is a great achievement. The blame will be on police/crpf/soldier and they should be punished also.
first kill revolutionists writers & communist sympathisers so called social activists then everything will be set right. Bcoz cpi-mao are targetting common people now. they have lost their way!!!
More than 3000 Chinese students non-violently protesting for democracy and freedom in the Tiananmen Square were violently machine-gunned down by Chinese soldiers deployed by the Chinese government to prevent them from gaining momentum and support.
Hail to our Chinese student brothers who were martyred for their dream of a democratic free China.
India must now take up their cause.Its her destiny.
Violence is a way of life in communism.The great communist leader Stalin himself killed more than 3 million communists in the U.S.S.R in concentration camps. Leon Trotsky, the great communist leader ,second only to Lenin, was killed by Stalin , who refused to share power with none.
12 million Chinese were tortured and killed by Mao in Chinese concentration camps, as a part of th so called Cultural Revolution.
All these are part and parcel of communism''s history.
And still the maoists have the nerve to claim to be humanists , after all these genocides.
