Discussion Board

Rahul's 'terror' stand: An unnecessary controversy


Total 179 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10   Older >
ameya
B Raman false anaylsis
by ameya on Dec 20, 2010 11:39 AM

The LeT has been active in India for over 17 years. We are used to dealing with it with no holds barred. ?????
is it a statement to write with Pride? is LeT is a charity organisation to let them work for 17 years? How they get support in India for 17 years? Isnt Insane Gandhi telling US that India has less threat from Pak terrorist even after so many blasts n killings..
people like you have sold India from preshistoric times to foreign invaders with this shameless attitude.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
Gaurav Katoch
Totally Paid News
by Gaurav Katoch on Dec 20, 2010 11:35 AM

why congi is more worried about hindu fanatics when everyone knows real threat is from LeT... Why no stress from congi on Varanasi blast investigation? is it that since thrs no RSS footprints to blast so no need to investigate?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
sudhir dhar
Rahul hates Hindus
by sudhir dhar on Dec 20, 2010 11:30 AM

That is why he spoted hate against the Hindus to a Christian foreigner.
No doubt about it.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
Rajiv
Re: This shameless Tam Bram
by Rajiv on Dec 21, 2010 09:24 AM
You know what I felt bad reading Ramans analysis..but u know have read ur statement on regionalistic casteist statement i feel like throwing up...if u r naive not know which side to be buttered thats ur total incompetency...dont blame ur incompetence on a particular section of people...and to go personal and generalizing it on a section of society is just the same reason y we have fundamentalist and seed fanatical thoughts in people...u r no different than a lame naive Rahul aka Raul Gandy not Gandhi ( Firoz Khan Gandys name was changed to Gandhi to fool the people ...and congress is good at that ) ...hes working for missionaries.. coming back to ur sick statements thats foul and offensive and abusive one can become. Keep ur nasty opinion right up ur A hole..shut the f up...I am a Tamil Brahmin but i have never been biased or so offensive against people..Feels so sick

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Rajiv
Re: This shameless Tam Bram
by Rajiv on Dec 21, 2010 09:24 AM
You know what I felt bad reading Ramans analysis..but u know have read ur statement on regionalistic casteist statement i feel like throwing up...if u r naive not know which side to be buttered thats ur total incompetency...dont blame ur incompetence on a particular section of people...and to go personal and generalizing it on a section of society is just the same reason y we have fundamentalist and seed fanatical thoughts in people...u r no different than a lame naive Rahul aka Raul Gandy not Gandhi ( Firoz Khan Gandys name was changed to Gandhi to fool the people ...and congress is good at that ) ...hes working for missionaries.. coming back to ur sick statements thats foul and offensive and abusive one can become. Keep ur nasty opinion right up ur A hole..shut the f up...I am a Tamil Brahmin but i have never been biased or so offensive against people..Feels so sick

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Madrassi Madrassa
Re: This shameless Tam Bram
by Madrassi Madrassa on Dec 20, 2010 11:36 AM
The most irritating part about tamil and bengali analysts is that they are more communist by their mindset and have no clear opinion on any "GOD-DAMN" thing!! They pretend to be larger than life in their analysis and end up giving nothing but plain trash. You can never know what they intended to say or what their analysis was. It is as confused as their genetic disorders!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Premkumar Arunachalam
Correct Understanding
by Premkumar Arunachalam on Dec 20, 2010 11:28 AM  | Hide replies

Mr. Raman's understanding of Rahul's statement is very appropriate. Immature minds of youngsters who get carried away by sensationalization done by media or stories planted by extremists cannot appreciate these nuances. History has shown mutliple that extremist elements of the majority community's cause more danger than minority extremism. And extremism stemming from within is always tougher to fight than externally sponsored ones. Extremist elements are best left to the fringes of the society; RSS trying to make this ideology mainstream is the biggest threat that India faces after Maoist extremism. I doubt if Congress led UPA has the inner strength & commitment to fight both these burning issues.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Maximum
Re: Correct Understanding
by Maximum on Dec 20, 2010 11:34 AM
History has also shown that when minority creates troubles beyond the capacity of majority majority will retaliate in a way that will anhilate the minority
Are you saying the minority appeasement is a good thing or you support it.
if not who gave you the rights to speak of majoriy of which you are not a part off.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
ramesh ra
Re: Re: Correct Understanding
by ramesh ra on Dec 20, 2010 12:21 PM
Dear Prem, though i agree that Raman's assessment is correct, i cannot agree to the minority/majority theory given by you. If minority interests are pampered at the expense of the majority interest, the equilibirum of the society tips over. The ramifications of such inequilibrium will be beyond our comprehension. Already we have seen lots of such incidients in India. But take the case of France (full veil)/Switzerland (minarets). They have passed laws against minorities in keeping with majority interests. There is hardly any ripple in those societies after these laws were passed, save some voice of protests. We can never say that these laws are against the rights of minorities. Can you imagine any of our politician standing up and taking such a stand ? Take the issues of Article 320 or the Common Civil Code. Till such time our politicians take bold stand keeping in with the majority interests, our society is going to go through such troubled times.......
dear maximum, pl take off that colored glass of yours. try to c all as indians rather than southerners/madrassis etc.. it helps to create more divide in already fractured society

   Forward   |   Report abuse
PRAMESWARN RADHAKRISHNAN
Rahul Gandhi
by PRAMESWARN RADHAKRISHNAN on Dec 20, 2010 11:17 AM

This new breed "Gandhi" from the Nehru family is a political novice. His only qualification to be in politics is that he belong to that family. Unfortunately, this family is the only binding force of the the disparate congress party. But this serves well for both the congress nethas and the "family" to achieve their own selfish ends. They talk about secularism only by condemning communalism of the Hindu variety but patronsing the other faiths communalism by closing their eyes. Hindus dividid by caste politics, though the majoriy, cannot be united anyway. So the simple arithmatic for congress is to make their well articulated spokespersons to bash the Hindu organisations not to bring them to books but to keep them alive to achieve their political ends. Why don't you ban the RSS for instance? Have you the political will? They will not, because then they will have no forum divide the Hindus and have hardly to convince votes by way of achievements in their more than 60 years of misrule. The congress has give this country only Corruption, nepotism, castism and communalism and all in the name of secularism, and Socialistic Pattern of Society. Only God can save this country from this one family party and its buffoons.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
ghayas sarwar
Re: Rahul G...................
by ghayas sarwar on Dec 20, 2010 11:18 AM
Wht abt u

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
John Cena
PSEUDOSECULAR IS CONG...
by John Cena on Dec 20, 2010 11:11 AM  | Hide replies

CASTE, RELIGION, MINORITY POLITICS, CoRRUPTION, DIVIDED, UNEDUCATED AND NON-SENSIBLE COMMON MAN/ AAM AADMI/ opposition leaders are things on which congress is surviving and ruling.

IF common man/ OPPOSITION PARTY is sensible, educated, united and keep broad picture of future in mind, UPA / CONG CAN BE EASILY DEFEATED IN UPCOMING LOKSABHA ELECTION.

OPPOSITION/ NDA/ BJP/ SHIV SENA SHOULD GIVE TICKETS TO EDUCATED SENSIBLE PARTYWOKER ONLY.

IF THEY/ BJP/ SHIV SENA ARE LISTENING, IMPLEMENT IT AND SEE THE RESULT.

NEVER GIVE UP!!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
ghayas sarwar
Re: PSEUDOSECULAR IS CONG...
by ghayas sarwar on Dec 20, 2010 11:21 AM
BJP want to go With Fanatic extremism like RSS, VHP, Shiv Sena... thats why they will never come to power unless they kick them out

   Forward   |   Report abuse
ameya
Re: Re: PSEUDOSECULAR IS CONG...
by ameya on Dec 20, 2010 12:32 PM
they were in power for 6 years and they will come back to power when people will start to Vote for development and not like votebanks of certain cast and religion.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Madrassi Madrassa
Re: Re: PSEUDOSECULAR IS CONG...
by Madrassi Madrassa on Dec 20, 2010 11:27 AM
You are right. BJP should align with peaceful green terror just like Congress to come back to power!!! Whadya say??

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
ravishankarsingh
congresi paid article
by ravishankarsingh on Dec 20, 2010 11:09 AM  | Hide replies

Mr. B Ramans's article reflects the attitude & approach of the media persons paid article approcach.

If any wrong done by Nehru & Indira clan is it an unnecesary controversy?

To implicate Sangh ideology using CBI is it a necessary step?

To overlook Izzlamic Zihadi Terrorism by congress is it unecessary controversy?

To give clean chit Izzlamic Zihadis of Saraimir & Sanjarpur of Azmgarh by congresii Rahul & Digvijay is it an unnecessary controversy?

when media persons enter Saraimir & Sanjarpur of Azmgarh for investigation they are beaten to raise these matters is it unnecessary controversy?

Why it is so Mr. B. Raman?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
shilpy
Re: congresi paid article
by shilpy on Dec 20, 2010 12:07 PM
raman has is a scared one who is looking for congressi affection.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 179 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10   Older >
Write a message