Re: PRECEDENCE
by Sanjeev on Dec 14, 2010 01:21 PM
There was no Islam before 715AD, so there were no muslims in indias before that. So how come now there are max no of muslims in India, may be they are converted from hindus, or else they may be from arabs. Can any body challenge this. And any body dare to except it?
Re: Re: PRECEDENCE
by this that on Dec 14, 2010 02:21 PM
THERE IS NO LOGIC OF PRAYING ON TOP OF RUINS OF TEMPLES. THE DEMOCRACY SAYS SO. EVEN ISLAM SAYS SO.
THEREFORE THIS IS JUST AN ATTEMPT TO CAST DOUBTS ON OTHERS IN THE COURTS.
Re: Majority!
by this that on Dec 14, 2010 01:14 PM
THAT IS BECAUSE WE LIVE ALONG WITH SHAMELESS RIOT MONGERS WHO WANT TO PRAY ON RUINS OF TEMPLES AT ANY COST.
INSPITE OF THE COURT POINTING OUT HOW MAJJIDS CANT BE BUILT ON TOP OF TEMPLES BY RULES OF COUNTRY AND BY RULES OF ISLAM ITSELF, THE SUNNI BOARD WANTS TO DRAG EVERYONE IN.
Dear afaryab Jilani, I ask one question. If articale 25& 26 give equal right to all faiths, why u minority need special rights.when muslims minority, they told like that. but they get majority, they said like we r majority what we put that's law not bothering abt constitution. mind it.
Re: re:appeal
by super thinker on Dec 14, 2010 12:59 PM
then u need seperate law, bring common civil law for all faiths. even christains also accept it. only muslims not accept it.
Re: Re: re:appeal
by harish on Dec 14, 2010 01:07 PM
They twist every thing according to their needs. They cry for equality and at the same time argue for special minority rights. Uniform Civil Code should be implemented.
