AND scum of the worst kind: churchill in very BAD light.
Think about it very logically, we Indians have absolutely no reason to hate Hitler,
He did us absolutely no harm, rather he went a bit out of his way to help us and he bombed the people who were lording us to smithereens.
On the other hand churchill was willfully committed to destroying our nation and our people all the time.
We Indians need to hate churchill with a hatred equal to the volume of water in the entire INDIAN ocean and we need to hate all Brits also likewise with equal vehemence.
An example of this was given by me when I spilled piping hot tea on a couple of British tourists in a train station and walked away with an amused look on my face while they were screaming from the scalding they had just received.
Re: holocaust
by rashid india on Dec 13, 2010 01:02 AM
Kudos to the writer who has exposed the Killer of Bengal. People still to date obsessed with the crime of Hitler, have been deliberately mis focused from this another butcher of second world war era. Now he must be burning in best of furnaces of the hell, fueled by hydrogen fusion.
All Indians and ALL Hindus MUST know the dark and unknown and sleazy side of our own great mahatma gandhee and nehru.How many indians and hindus know their real great or hollow leaders?The fact is Mahatma Gandhee was made by the crooked british by first bribing mohandas gandhee and promising to make him the greatest humna being on Earth and by promising all british government help and help of British media and agents all over india and the world. This was the greatest dirty goebbelian trick ever played by crooked colonizers.Sadly majority hindus are still under the charm and fake publicity stunts to fool millions of indians forever
Re: Why NOT explore the Dark &Sleazy sides of Mahatma
by ramdev on Dec 14, 2010 11:17 AM
Gandhi was a puppet of British’s. The deal between Gandhi and British looks straight to me ‘ask Indians to be non-violent against as (British’s) and we will help you (Gandhi) to get political mileage and suppress your (Gandhi’s) political opponent.’ Unfortunately (for Indian) this deal worked. Any person with very little common-sense can point out the fact the thousand of innocent Indian were slaughtered by British’s for no reason atoll. In fact British’s never need any reason to hang, to Latti-charge or to imprison any Indian. Very common and wicked example to support my statement is Massacre of Jalianwala Bagh which took place in Amritsar, Punjab (13 April 1919). The official figures were 379 killed and 1200 wounded. Actual numbers were 1300 dead and many more wounded. Here the point is why Gandhi’s public gathering was not targeted. Why Gandhi was never latti-charged nether shot dead like my other Indian who supported freedom struggle. The reason seems straight forward. Gandhi brainwashed and convinced Indian to give up violence against British’s. This was a plus point for the British’s.
Re: Why NOT explore the Dark &Sleazy sides of Mahatma
by ramdev on Dec 14, 2010 11:23 AM
Tru Incident........................................ Woodrow Wyatt asked to Gandhi, `What would you have done if the British, whenever you threatened to fast unto death, had let you die?' Out came the high-pitched giggle: ` There was never any chance of that. I drank orange juice and other fruit juices. I could have lived that way for years. Very healthy.'
Re: Why NOT explore the Dark &Sleazy sides of Mahatma
by SONU SINGH on Dec 14, 2010 02:23 PM
HE IS THE ONE RESPONSIBLE FOR UNIFYING EVERY INDIAN FOR A COMMON CAUSE. HE MUST BE RESPECTED FOR WHAT HA HAS DONE FOR OUR COUNTRY.
Re: Congrats Ms. Mukerjee
by Navi Reyd on Dec 10, 2010 01:55 AM
Is that why you are living in the cradle of Europe? When Indians themselves look down on other Indians, thanks to the caste system, why blame others?
Re: Re: Congrats Ms. Mukerjee
by JGN on Dec 11, 2010 01:26 PM
Navi Reyd, still Indians did not eliminate the entire races like the followers of two WestAsianReligions had done in the ArabianPeninsula, Europe, America, Africa and Australia. The WestAsianLiteratures aka h0leyBooks justified Slavery which was prevalent in many parts of the world till not long ago.
Re: Congrats Ms. Mukerjee
by True Hindustani on Dec 10, 2010 07:34 PM
Do you know Ved, if there was no internet even your posting would not have come to light and the editors would have seen to it that your comments are not seen by anybody other than yourslef?Even in this age the moderators of websites can do all sorts of such tricks, what a shame
Re: why blame churchill?
by Sunny Nair on Dec 11, 2010 10:46 AM
Churchill through this famine, Stalin through his communist purges, Hitler, Mussolini and Japan through their World War II campaigns killed millions of people.
History is for the historians ans the poilitical Lot to learn how to avoid mistakes of the past and or how to redo a good thing of the past in a better way. Details of Winston Churchill provided only increases our knowledge or change our view point but does nothing to change our lives or meteout punishment to him for his past deeds if legally found punishable. I would love to read articles /books based on research findings as to how to avoid so many scams that are occuring in India where-in people are suffering more than due to past famines/war crimes.
Re: Winston Churchill
by Arvind Sharma on Dec 09, 2010 04:51 PM
You do not need to read any book on how to avoid scams. The thumb rule to avoid it is really very simple, known to everybody and practices by none. The rule is those in positions of power should consider themselves as merely the servants of the public and not their masters with the sole aim of providing comfort and happiness to them.
Churchill's dislike of Indians is hardly news. Madhusree Mukerjee's book contains the details of his policy on India, which has been know to many British historians, but ignored in a classic English way. His dilike of Jews is equally well documented, and in 1920 Churchill wanted to use gas against rebelling Kurds in Iraq.
His term as Chancellor of the Exchequer was a disaster. His return to the Gold Standard was the big blunder which eventually wrecked the British economy and indirectly led to the General Strike of 1926.
The world may have never heard of Winston Churchill again, if it were not for the mendacious foul play by the Germans in breaking every peace agreement which they signed. Between Churchill and Hitler, Churchill stands out as the brave, upright democrat. Only because Hitler, in comparison, was a compulsive liar and a barbarian. However, his democracy was the rule of the privelged. His disdain for workers and their demands made him an admirer of Mussolini. So much for Britain's great savior from the claws of fascism!
Churchill's dislike of Indians is hardly news. Madhusree Mukerjee's book contains the details of his policy on India, which has been know to many British historians, but ignored in a classic English way. His dilike of Jews is equally well documented, and in 1920 Churchill wanted to use gas against rebelling Kurds in Iraq.
His term as Chancellor of the Exchequer was a disaster. His return to the Gold Standard was the big blunder which eventually wrecked the British economy and indirectly led to the General Strike of 1926.
The world may have never heard of Winston Churchill again, if it were not for the mendacious foul play by the Germans in breaking every peace agreement which they signed. Between Churchill and Hitler, Churchill stands out as the brave, upright democrat. Only because Hitler, in comparison, was a compulsive liar and a barbarian. However, his democracy was the rule of the privelged. His disdain for workers and their demands made him an admirer of Mussolini. So much for Britain's great savior from the claws of fascism!
Churchill's dislike of Indians is hardly news. Madhusree Mukerjee's book contains the details of his policy on India, which has been know to many British historians, but ignored in a classic English way. His dilike of Jews is equally well documented, and in 1920 Churchill wanted to use gas against rebelling Kurds in Iraq.
His term as Chancellor of the Exchequer was a disaster. His return to the Gold Standard was the big blunder which eventually wrecked the British economy and indirectly led to the General Strike of 1926.
The world may have never heard of Winston Churchill again, if it were not for the mendacious foul play by the Germans in breaking every peace agreement which they signed. However, his democracy was the rule of the privelged. His disdain for workers and their demands made him an admirer of Mussolini. So much for Britain's great savior from the claws of fascism!
Between Churchill and Hitler, Churchill stands out as the brave, upright democrat. Only because Hitler, in comparison, was a compulsive liar and a barbarian.
