Re: If it would had happened in India
by Suprasanna Bhat on Aug 24, 2010 03:26 PM
Thts our nature...we value lives more than anything else! nothing wrong in it if there is no other option left (as in Khandahar Episode)! In this (manila) case, they could have used a sniper to avoid collateral damage...
Re: Re: If it would had happened in India
by Check Out on Aug 24, 2010 09:33 PM
They would have given the job back and later when all the lives are saved would have hatch him to death. Bollywood style all live saved, issue resolved
Everybody is criticising manila police ..for so called mismanagement but nobody has answer to actuall how they cud had done it.Instead i saw some bravest act where police where near the bus and breaking the door very near to armed hijacker.. Even in india NSG failed to save lives in nariman house and took 3 days for taj operation..
Re: Tell me how u cud had save all the lives !!!
by firefighter on Aug 24, 2010 10:54 AM
WHY NO ONE IS CRITISING CHRIS TIANIYT NOW, IF IT WAS DONE BY SOME MUS MILIT ANT THEN ALL BEGGARS WILL ABUSE WHOL COMMUNITY.
Re: Re: Tell me how u cud had save all the lives !!!
by Mohanji Pyarelal on Aug 24, 2010 11:38 AM
@firefighter, you should understand the basic reason. Muzzies fight for the jihad/religion and therefore, create panic in the rest. This guy was not fighting for Jihad, but for his own personal reasons. You got it?
Re: Tell me how u cud had save all the lives !!!
by Pooja Jain on Aug 24, 2010 10:19 AM
But remember, Taj situation was very different. Terrorists were hiding inside corridors and rooms and at innumerable places inside the Taj. Thats very different from a hostage situation inside the bus where u can actually see the terrorist and the hostages. A situation very very different from the Taj.
Re: Disastrously handled operation !
by dev abg on Aug 24, 2010 08:48 PM
hi ,frnds, but i dint understand one logic, can anyone explain me this logic, every muslim is not terorist but every terorist is muslim, how come this can be true
Had this been done by a Muslim, Islam would have been put to trial. But if someone else does it, religion is never mentioned by the biased and Jeewishhh controlled media.
Re: Dual Standards
by rahul sinha on Aug 24, 2010 07:13 PM
My Dear Secular Indian. How do u call urself a secular Indian if u put a racist remark like the one above.
Re: Dual Standards
by jithesh k on Aug 24, 2010 06:05 AM
hey dude.. when hijackers.. sing praise for allah(who ever he's)and they are taking revenge for someone dead somewhere in the world and means no business to them other than being of the same religion.. then i would say.. yes.. ISLAM.. may be i'm narrow minded.. but to be honest.. there is no single(forget many) leader who can command the whole muslims.. in a pious way.. every so called leader is busy building his own empire...I would say.. ISLAM being put to trial has just been coz of the ordinary muslims.. who do not stand up to their con leaders conning in their name..
Re: Dual Standards
by dev abg on Aug 24, 2010 08:49 PM
hi ,frnds, but i dint understand one logic, can anyone explain me this logic, every muslim is not terorist but every terorist is muslim, how come this can be true
Needless to say, the hijack incidents now a days becoming good weapon for the people to get their demands fulfilled. This is really critical issue to deal with.This requires strong determination and skill to handle the issue. This will ever be a challenge to those who try to counter it.
