If people lack culture and sensitivity to honor the sanctity of any religious place, they should be punished to deter such behavior for happening again.
If the people happen to be educated and polite, we can talk to them and explain why they need to control their libido in such places of spiritual purity..
If they are rude and uncivilized (like the szxceckular patronizers), they need to be thrashed thoroughly.. doesnt matter to them though - they'll probably even claim it as a violation of their "animal rights" (human rights)
Re: media twisting facts to stereotype hindu activists
by Jasad Dusty on Aug 12, 2010 01:47 PM
Why bring in the mosque? It would have been more relevent if this idot had asked, "can anyone kiss or even hold hands in a chruch?". As for culture and sensitivity. Take a walk on the footpaths of Mumbai in the night time and get to know your bloody god damed sensitivity and your screwed up culture.
Re: wrong target
by siddharth on Aug 12, 2010 12:50 AM
Now a days couples not even leaving temple premises. In Andhra since temples are located in holyhills many couples were caught and punished but no media cover since they are temple authorities and not from Bajarangdal, vhp or RSS
Is this a news, just BD just gave light punishment. Nothing big ,but media is presenting it as attack. Why dont you complain about Islamic/christian fanatics. Why media is having allergy about hindus. Jus dont run behind money yaar. Rediff is stupid.
Re: Why media is against Hindus?
by wilma menezes on Aug 12, 2010 01:07 PM
Because even you people behave like other religious fanatics. You hindus keep attacking christians did they say anything to you. you enter their premises and attack. Even you are STUPID.
Re: Re: Why media is against Hindus?
by Jasad Dusty on Aug 12, 2010 02:23 PM
Why punish these poor people like this. They are only doing what Lord Krishna did with the Gopies?