This is a right international forum where we can express our stand. I completely disagree with the statement made by Hon. Minister. Obliviously, we can convey the request of assisting us to fight against the terrorist and bring them in book through diplomatic means along with intelligence sharing, knowledge sharing with like minded countries.
In this forum, we must have clear our stand and voice in a very specific way to the world community. We must make the world understand that no one can take India as granted and India have the necessary resources and strength to fight alone and if necessary, will take stern action of any nature, without any compromise, to eliminate the terrorist and their abettor.
We should not be soft in any international forum. Let all the country understand that India, is country with highest level of self respect and esteem and India citizen will not tolerate any wrong doing by any element or country.
This is our greatest mental block that we become too soft and can not stand tall. In the past, during Kargil war, we have given safe passage to the intruder, without eliminating them completely from the root. We would have avail the Kargil opportunity to carry out surgical operation to destroy all terrorist camps along the LOC.
Re: terrorist attack in India
by janijohn janardhan on Sep 29, 2009 12:58 PM
an omar abdulla cud hv made a better foreign minister. We need young & dynamic people. This guy looks as if he just woke up from sleep
It is a concurrent quest future generation of India will like to know on what base Mr. Krishna was assigned as Foreign Minister ! It is obvious that the post of a foreign minister of India, is suppose to meet multi-cross-interest all around with expertisement. Here we need a real alert brain, not an old tired loyal bird. Sonia, please be ready to face the next generation of Rahul & Priyanka.
Re: Humble question
by Prasannan Nambiar on Sep 28, 2009 06:00 AM
Prakash Chandra
One fails to understand on what basis you are questioning SM Krishna's assignment as Foreign Minister. For his educational qualifications (he is a Fulbright scholar) and for his stint as a Karnataka Chief Minister he is amply qualified to be the Foreign Minister. Maybe his age may weigh against him. But then we have so many ministers who are overaged if you may say.
Maybe what we need to do is delve into his credentials before posing humble questions.
Re: Humble question
by janijohn janardhan on Sep 29, 2009 12:56 PM
He proved his worth as in gandigiri by sticking on with mahrstra guv job for as long as hi-caman wanted. Thats the merit of his quest to be recognized as a tru-blu p_s_y_cophant
Re: tell to them
by janijohn janardhan on Sep 29, 2009 12:57 PM
kisna_sir_tell_to_them_to_tell_to_pakistan_to_tell_to_their_people_to_tell_to_their_relatives_to_tell_to_give_punishment_to_t errorists_to_save_us
