having listened to your number of panel discussions on times now since last 4-5 years but what is amazing is that it not possible to make out what you stand for - terrorism or peace. this is a quandry. no doubt you have stories with an insider view of whatever you say but what you stand for you do not say. you pick up cudgels with panelists on behalf of every tom dick and hary from your side and you wash the dirty linen of parvez musharaf whenever you get an opportunity. do you have t condemn the taliban, al-qaida with same vehemance. all is being done in the name of allah in your land.
Re: Hamid Mir
by Aviram Vijh on Jan 06, 2010 08:16 PM
what a weird question from a kashmiri pandit such as urself...can a 1slamiya stand for peace anywhere in the world?
wat do v think has been cropping up in the mud slush excreted by the coward satyagrahi leftovers who ruled for the better part of the bygone century....the whole of paki army is fathomless nullah of breeding terorists.. and here we are wasting ourwelves on such articles trying to distinguish bet a paki military and a militant.....c'mmonn give us a break
What is this article about? Its title doesnt reflect the fact that kashmiri was a terrorist. The writer is trying to portray this terrorist $cyum as a hero.
All this terrorist ever did was harm to humanity. There is nothing glorious in his life or death.
Have become totally impotent under the corrupt and cowardly political leadership- they could not avenge the death of their officer. No wonder people like Achyutanandan reserve the 'd0g' epithet for Indian Army officers! I am totally aghast at this news- why did the defence forces not take any action for such a brutal killing of one of their own? What happened to the pride of the Army which boasted of 'no man left behind'?
