iran is the one of the few countries not starting any agreesion since its onception 30 years ago . iran has not illegally occupied any country since the last 30 years . even US itelf claimed that there is no evidence that iran is makking nukes . iran has voluntarily singed the NPT which India has not , while facing dangers which huge comapred to that of India's . Ira has more adversaries than any other nuclear armed country includin Israhell . Iran is among the only two countries which have faced WMDs . (more than 1 lakh were killed by the US made chemical bombs exploded in IRAN by SADDAM as per US orders . Iran is one of the countries always asking for peace . Iran is one of the countries whose leaders have to face lies and propaganda spread by the US and Israhell media , distorting their words, ( eg. Prez Ahmadinejad said israhell should be wiped out from the map = meaning the jews should go back to their respctive countries AND NOT TO NUKE ISRAHELL AS IS BEING POTRAYED ) . The policy of iran has only been to defend and never to attack first . Finally they have never hurt India either openly or covertly and have always wanted the good of india and all the NAM natons and other underdeveloped countries . I wish to say a lot more but .............
Re: IRAN
by roge on Nov 28, 2009 04:53 PM
Ali Bhaie .. Iran is also a shia country looking for revenge .. just like all u shias do .. so sorry. in the end u choose wrong friends ..
Re: IRAN
by Lakshminarayana on Nov 28, 2009 12:04 PM
Remember the dirtiest thing that the USA did to Iran. In the fifties they toppled a democratic regime and installed an oppressive puppet regime.
Re: Re: Re: Re: IRAN
by Lakshminarayana on Nov 28, 2009 12:24 PM
What he is telling is that the food eaten by Manmohan Singh in the USA is contaminated with the drug called LSD, which alters the consciousness of a person. Hence the reason for India's anti-Iran vote.
Re: Re: IRAN
by Z X on Nov 28, 2009 03:44 PM
yeah, satanic caaba is standing there till the oil is there in m/e. Once its gone sand origin mafia cult would also be gone...
don't think or idolize american thought. human right voilation in china is their internal matter. building nuclear plant to meet their own need is threat to the world.??
As a muzzie country,India can never rely on Iran.No matter how friendly we are,these people are known to back stab others.India should continue to take stern stand against terror funding countries.
Re: India should take stern stand againt terror funding countries
by chintan jhunjhunwala on Nov 28, 2009 11:37 AM
since a few days am not able to open the 'write a message' to post a message as it shows error on page.but to reply to posts i am able to reach.funny.
Re: Re: India should take stern stand againt terror funding count
by proudbrahmos on Nov 28, 2009 11:45 AM
Dear,foe's foe is a friend most of the times..that a way Iran is a very good friend of us..not only now but since historical times..
Re: Re: Re: India should take stern stand againt terror funding c
by Z X on Nov 28, 2009 03:40 PM
Abdali & Nadishah were true freinds of India, right? When it comes to OIC (Orgn of Idiotic Countries) all members behave the same way and pass resolutions on Kashmir, blah blah...
Re: talking about particular community iz
by Lakshminarayana on Nov 28, 2009 11:20 AM
Please do not bring religion into the picture for the most trivial things.
Re: Re: Re: talking about particular community iz
by Lakshminarayana on Nov 28, 2009 11:23 AM
What does voting against Iran has got to do with religion?
Re: Re: Re: Re: talking about particular community iz
by kalpesh shah on Nov 28, 2009 11:29 AM
u r secular and voting against a minor country is secular act and act against minors in your country is non secular act??
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: talking about particular community iz
by Lakshminarayana on Nov 28, 2009 11:32 AM
Sir, this vote against Iran has nothing to do with religion.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Losing a good friend
by Lakshminarayana on Nov 28, 2009 11:22 AM
Perhaps the blame lies within ourselves. There is no point in blaming something else always.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Losing a good friend
by Sathish N on Nov 28, 2009 11:25 AM
Blame is definitely on us, but we have to identify the problem correctly.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Losing a good friend
by Lakshminarayana on Nov 28, 2009 11:30 AM
I do not subscribe to the theory that EVMs are a source of the problem. I have come to believe that people who vote to maintain status quo despite the status quo being sub-standard are the ones to be blamed. Just yesterday, the news in these forums was that we are worse than Zimbabwe in dealing with hunger.
Re: it waz our obama's dinner which
by Sathish N on Nov 28, 2009 11:11 AM
Soonia is kept here by the elitist group. She and her stoges will do exactly as htey say. The news will say India, but we all know who is making the call.
Had India voted in favour of IRAN on nuclear program, it would definitely help India in trouble times ahead in form of China and Pak.
India's relationship with Iran is very critical and it will really productive to counter Pakistan and great help to have access to Afganistan.
Indian leaders are not spineless, but our motive is Economy growth in first place by sacrificing other things.
India has to be in a commending position to oppose US, EU or any other developed nation - so it's time to lick their foot and help grow economy. Hasty decision never help. Sacrifice would surely help one day!
Re: Would have helped in troubled times
by john parker on Nov 28, 2009 11:02 AM
IRAN ALWAYS VOTES ON THE SIDE OF PAKISTAN ON ALL KASHMIR RESOLUTIONS PASSED IN THE ORGANISATION OF ISLAMIC COUNTRIES AND OTHER WORLD FORUMS , HENCE WHY SHOULD INDIA VOTE FOR SUCH A COUNTRY ? IRAN WANTS ACCESSION OF KASHMIR TO PAKISTAN , IT IS ITS STATED STANCE.
Re: Re: Would have helped in troubled times
by ReadWrite on Nov 28, 2009 11:11 AM
Sequence of events changed it of late - recent attack on Iran's elite guard suspected to be originated from Pakistan, so if few such things to happen, IRAN and PAK would dash each other that would help India.
The foolish way UN, IAEA and the world under 'enslaved' under a few 'Erstwhile First World Nations' is going to back fire in a big way.
The reasons for the above contentions are:
1. The world body has unfairly treating 'Iran', even after it has been crying hoarse that it does not want it to use for 'Nuclear Weapons', which in fact is against 'Islamic Tenets' of not killing Children, Women, Adults and Non-Combatants in war.
2. The imposition of 'threats' are by nations that are headed by a 'Country' which is the sole 'Country' in the history of the world to have killed 4 Lakhs unarmed, Children, Women and Adults is like a 'Criminal' imposing his will on a 'Non-violent' man. (Just like Britain and Churchil bashing Gandhiji as a 'nigger dog' - Who won in the end is history).
3. After all these, if the world powers are going to press Iran with any further sanctions without the 'Moral or Ethical' right to do so and in contravention of all 'International Agreements', it would encourage an unfairly isolated 'Iran' into the real production of 'Atom Bombs' - the most nastiest scenario possible in middle east.
It is high time some other nation other than America take the leading role in dealing with Iran.
India could well do that, but in our present situation it is very intelligent for us to take a non-committal role as we need to consider a whole lot of issues like our economy, employment and exports.
Hence possibility with rest of the BRIC - Brazil, Russia or Chian. Lets see.
Re: Just because of
by Pat Thakur on Nov 28, 2009 11:23 AM
Be specific. "Because Of USA" means that the Shit Kangress wants India to become a Colony of the US. (imagine the same Shit Kangress boasting of being the only one, conveniently forgetting others, having fought for Independence from Britian as a British Colony.....) This they want to do because inspite of enjoying 60 years of Independence, they still have not learnt how to live or think on their own (or do not want do anything by own will but just cry.) So they try to lag onto the PALLU of foreign countries.
