hey guys here the question is not of whom among us support or believe jihad as violence or not but can our government react to such terrorists and there activities. so shamefull to read one guy mentioned above ran away from indian authorities.are we so much coward that we cannot play a tit for tat with terrorism also!! so much heartning it could have been better for us that we could had been run by a communists type or a capitalists type of government then the condition could have been better for us.look at US after 9/11 they have not faced any attack or look at china whom have not any kind of such brutal atttacks on civilians.but in our case its different we r still waiting for bigger or simillar attacks lik mumbai to happen and counting the dead bodies of our citizens to increase in such attacks!!still we r saying that "DIALOUGE IS THE ONLY WAY OUT????" !!!!!!!!
Sometimes I think India needs a different strategy. Open some sections of our border, let terrorist come in any number and then encircle them, like a Chakravhiew. Then kill them all, grab all their weapons and distribute them to our police forces, this way we will not have to buy weapons. The other day I saw Maoists taking over Rajdhani, Fill full rajdhani train secretly with security forces in civil uniform, and delibrately drag and stop in maoist areas, when they come kill them all. We need something different. Empty villages near the border and let army live in disguise, in civil clothes, when terrorist come kill them by hook or crook.
Re: KILL BY DECEIT
by truthforeveryone on Nov 06, 2009 11:48 PM
but my friend what abt G@ddars they will encircle our police force in a bigger chakraview
Re: Re: Re: WHY???
by L on Nov 06, 2009 11:57 PM
Secularism is not defined by the number of people following a particular religion. Turkey has no official state religion.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: WHY???
by secret on Nov 07, 2009 02:57 AM
@Mohammed Yousuf It was a folly of Hindu leaders that allowed Muslims to stay in Hindusthan at the time of partition. Our generations are going to be paying for it.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: WHY???
by secret on Nov 07, 2009 02:55 AM
@L India at the moment is pseudo-secular. Any $hit you say is related to your religion, and our govt licks it up.
Re: WHY???
by Prakash Chandra on Nov 07, 2009 12:49 AM
Some of our Indian leaders described Mr. Jinnah as a secular. By that account isn't Pakistan a secular country ?
Re: Re: WHY???
by james on Nov 07, 2009 01:13 AM
prakash do u personally believe such rubbish statement by our indian political leaders??? if talking sense then our political leaders are only giving such statement for sake of votes
What is Jihad? The word Jihad stems from the Arabic root word J-H-D, which means "strive." Other words derived from this root include "effort," "labor," and "fatigue." Essentially Jihad is an effort to practice religion in the face of oppression and persecution.
Re: Re: What is Jihad?
by Uaskedforit on Nov 07, 2009 12:45 AM
The cardinal woprd in it is not GOD ... It is YOUR So would it be right to say that Jihad is fighting for the cause of your God against the cause of someone elses God ... ?
Re: .......
by Gaurav Gaddhyan on Nov 06, 2009 11:34 PM
whats the definition of the evil.... suppressing women is not evil... killing innocents is not evil...
Americans may now do well to check if there is some connection between the increased terrorist activity and the election of the new President, seen as a sympathizer of the terrorists? The world has certainly noticed that the Guantanamo facility was not ruining the US economy and it need not be treated as the top priority of a nation who has lost thousands of its citizens in 9/11. There is an expressed reluctance in sending more US troops to Afghanistan. More billions of dollars are being pumped into Pakistan who have been cheating the US on terror handling. Iran and Libya have mustered courage to insult the world body (UN) publicly. Surely all nations need to be treated equally, more or less, but hot those who are hostile and dangerous for world peace and those promoting terrorism actively. When talking on terrorism, the President skillfully turns his words into a dispassionate, philosophical discourse, forgetting the American and free world blood being shed.
