Not many including in the Congress will miss him. He looked like a dummy, he acted like a dummy and he was a dummy! This tamasha write up on a useless person is amazing and shows the chamchgiri media can do!
Re: Not many will miss him!
by narayana wirter on Jan 25, 2009 02:08 PM
WHAT WAS VAJAPAYEE? HE WAS ALSO A DUMMY IN THE WHEEL CHAIR NOTHING BUT A SHOW PIECE AND REMOTE CONTROL.
Re: Not many will miss him!
by neo on Jan 25, 2009 12:13 AM
aptly said...cong has always made a mockery of the system and is ...time has come to say tata , bye, bye...lets say a requiem mass would b appropriate for the party...
Re: Not many will miss him!
by JayaKumar Patchala on Jan 24, 2009 10:54 PM
Good for economy, I think. Atleast thats what they are expecting with Chidambaram and Manmohan out, everybody is expecting some sort of an economic miracle?. The western economies are resorting to witchcraft to get out of the economic slump.
When Subhash chandra bose was elected Congress president in 1933, Gandi dismissed him from Congress.
When majority of states suported Sardar patel for PM post in 1947, Gandi forcefully made Nehru as PM.
Even the senior most leader Sharat pawar contested to become Congress chief, but Sonia was scared of him, and supportd the dummy Sitaram Kesri, and kicked out Pawar.
Re: Gandi Family has a history of destroying senior leaders
by neo on Jan 25, 2009 12:18 AM
not just destroying senior leaders ...finishing off efficient young leader in suspicious accidents - scindia, pilot n many many more...their hands r tarnishd..
Honble Prime Minister Shri Manmohan Singh real role in the functioing of UPA cannot be ignored. Manmohan Singh is a perfect gentleman of the highest order. His work has been highly appericated by everyone including the oppostion and he is highly regarded in the international world. He is non conterversal and one of the best economist in the world. His mature and far reaching advise is sought after by both friend and foe, in short he is invaluable for the Indian Nation.
Re: Prime Minister Role In Indian Democracy
by jaya prakash on Jan 24, 2009 05:10 PM
I think, you are the office boy of PM office because supporting PM's duties is your existence. In my opinion, he is a rubberstamp PM. We no more require such PM
He is the Best Gentelman Prime Minister ever he never shows off his acheivements like other laud and crazy ministers....i wish him a sucessfull by pass & quick recovery
Re: Re: Re: The Best Prime Minister EVER
by Mahavir on Jan 26, 2009 11:03 AM
Just being gentlemanly is not sufficient for leding a country? My dhobi is also v.gentleman. Kapildev is a great sprotsman and a patriot. But is that a qualification to become a PM? Do you get it Gagan,Farokh and all sycophants?
How Manmohan Singh undermined national security On May 26’ 2004 the Common Minimum Programme of the UPA government was unleashed on the nation. It promised an immediately repeal of the stringent POTA act. The very act which was meant to primarily prevent Islamic terror became the victim of Islamic appeasement. The juvenile critics of POTA are seemingly ignorant of the fact that every international state facing Islamic terror has taken recourse to such legal aids. The US Patriot Act of 2001 which was wholeheartedly endorsed by both Republicans and Democrats in American interest is an example to this effect. Its even more draconian sequel allows the attorney general to deport any foreigner, including permanent legal residents whose presence is considered 'inconsistent with national security'. The summary deportation can be carried out even if there is no evidence of crime or criminal intent. [4] Now, who needs such a law to prevent Bangladeshi infiltration does not require a second guesses. In the UK, anti-terror laws allow arrest of a suspect even in possession of a terrorism training manual. Some other leftist agencies along with their Islamic cohorts claim that POTA did not prevent the attack on parliament. The lunacy of such arguments is evidenced by the fact that stringent anti-rape laws often fail to deter rapists. But the proof of POTA’s success can be gauged from the fact that almost all the terror activities which transpired during the NDA rule witnessed des
Re: truth on great MMS
by Ritesh Mishra on Jan 24, 2009 01:08 PM
---fidayeen suicide squads in operation. In stark contrast, is the current UPA regime where civilian soft targets at Delhi, Mumbai, Malgaon, Hyderabad and Jaipur were bombed using local Muslim, probably illegal Pakistani-Bangladeshi intermediaries. It is POTA not ordinary terror law which is required for combating the enemies of the nation.
Quite conspicuously during the NDA regime 271 terrorist modules / sleeping cells operating within India’s borders were busted in contrast to a mere 28 in the preceding years. [5] The current situation is more or less reminiscent of the pre-Advani days.
Manmohan Singh publicly claims tackling the Naxal menace requires an out-of-the-box thinking. But the inconsistent government policy in combating naxalism is evident from the home minister Shivraj Patil’s musing that Maosits are only misguided children of India. [6]
There are at present 15-20 million illegal Bangladeshis residing in India according to a report of the Intelligence Bureau. [7] On 10 April, 1992, Shri Hiteshwar Saikia, the then Chief Minister of Assam stated that there were 3 million Bangladeshi illegal migrants in Assam but two days later, he committed a volte- face and declared that there were no illegal migrants in Assam. [8] The current UPA home minister, Shivaraj Patil brushed off the concerns and considered illegal Bangladeshi migrants deserved a free run since they only come looking for jobs. This is the attitude of probably the most incompetent and effeminate
Re: Re: truth on great MMS
by Ritesh Mishra on Jan 24, 2009 01:10 PM
... home minister India has yet produced. On a sidenote, the trio of Shivraj Patil, Arjun Singh and Manmohan Singh share a common trait of not enjoying the confidence of the people. Shivraj Patil and Arjun Singh both lost their Lok Sabha elections. They were reinstated into the cabinet obviously not because of any extraordinary abilities but only because of Sonia Gandhi’s insistence on rewarding her bootlickers and maintaining her strategic hegemony inside the UPA government.
The Supreme court in 2005 struck down the illegal IMDT act in Assam according to which the onus of proving one's nationality or otherwise lies on the complainant whereas under the (usually universal) Foreigners Act, the onus is on the accused. The court also strongly observed that the act in question had encouraged Bangladeshi infiltration. [9] A panicky Congress party in fear of losing out on its Muslim vote ahead of Assam assembly elections exhibited its anti-national stance by amending the Foreigner’s act itself which effectively subverted the contrary Supreme Court ruling and continued to facilitate illegal Bangladeshi migration which constitutes the Congress party’s bonded votebank. [10]
The Tarun Gogoi led Assam government has even conceded that Bangladesh and neighbouring states have encroached upon more than 700 acres of the state's land [11]
Re: Re: Re: truth on great MMS
by Ritesh Mishra on Jan 24, 2009 01:10 PM
----The George C Francis committee argued that big changes in demographics in terms of an illegal influx from Bangladesh cannot be ignored since this population often shelters anti-India elements and provides a steady recruitment to jihadi modules. [12]
In 2006, the UPA government ordered a head count of Muslims in the armed forces, a heinous attempt to communalize the armed forces. But the sinister attempt of the government was thankfully blocked.
Pandering to the cause of Islamic Fundamentalism
SIMI, the student Muslim terrorist organization which idolizes Osama Bin Laden and considers democracy, secularism and nationalism to be the handiwork of the devil was banned only under the NDA government in 2001 despite stiff resistance from Sonia Gandhi and other Congress netas. [13] In 2006 Teesta Setalvad challenged SIMI’s ban and quite inaccurately blamed Hindu organizations for the Malegaon riots when all the time it was SIMI who was behind the attack. But Manmohan Singh instead awarded the Padma Shri to her in return of her ‘splendid services in combating communalism.’
Not the plight farmers committing suicide in Vidarbha and Andhra, or the 7/11 Mumbai blasts, but the arrest of single Indian Muslim doctor abroad on terror charges caused him sleepless nights.
In December 2006, Manmohan Singh exposed his most communal intentions in allowing Muslims the claim to the first right on resources. [14] Laloo Prasad Yadav and the JNU have even started recognizing ...
Re: Re: Re: Re: truth on great MMS
by Ritesh Mishra on Jan 24, 2009 01:12 PM
-madarsa degrees to be valid for the railway jobs and social science courses respectively! As Taslima Nasreen was being hounded out of the country by Islamic fundamentalists, the UPA government was planning on how best to wash hands off a ‘pest’ like her. PriyaRanjan Das Munshi, the I&B minister had the temerity to demand of her a humiliating apology with folded hands for hurting Muslim sentiments. [15] Manmohan Singh’s own compliance in this case was evidenced when he denied the request of Nikolas Sarkozi, the visiting French President to award the ‘Simone De Beauvoir’ prize to Taslima in order not to upset the volatile Islamic sensitivities.
The government authorized Rajinder Sachar, a anti-Hindu marxist to author the anti-constitutional, logically fraudulent and academically nonchalant ‘Sachar Committee report’ which read more like the 1938 Pirpur counterpart with its endless imaginations of Islamic victimization and backwardness. Never mind that Muslims have higher birth rates, lesser infant mortality rates, and less number of BPL families. The Sachar Committee was set up with a pre-conceived notion that the Muslims were the most backward and poorest lot without taking into consideration as to why all other religious minorities, namely, Parsis, Jews, Sikhs and Jains, advanced far ahead of the so-called Hindu majority [16]
The Delhi HC court strongly eprimanded the government for pandering to the interests of a particular community when poverty was a a common enemy
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: truth on great MMS
by gagan bhanot on Jan 24, 2009 02:22 PM
from where u copied all these lines??? write wht u think dont copy....plzzzz
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: truth on great MMS
by neo on Jan 25, 2009 12:32 AM
thanx for bringing the fact to the people in stupor...we want to b slaves...whoever stands up with pride and dignity and courage for Bharat we term them communalist and hindu fundamentalist so that the real desh drohis can work unhindered...this is our game plan n we have our ndtv, cnn-ibn, the hindu, toi etc to do our jobs to bark our agendas as pavlovian dogs...errrr congress dogs...salaam
Re: Re: truth on great MMS
by mangejsingh jodha on Jan 24, 2009 04:02 PM
DEAR SIR BASIC IS TO PROTECT, SAFEGUARD, PREVENT TERRORIST ACTIVITIES-ACTION-ATTACKS. SUCH MEASURES ARE TO BE ADOPTED-IMPLEMETED, ACTIVATED- YOU MAY CALL WHATEVER U WOULD LIKE TO. WITH YOU SUPERIOR INTELLIGENC AND LOGICS YOU MAY JUSTIFY ON EITHER SIDE OR WAYS. IF YOUR WELL WORDED LOGICS- PREVENTS THE TERRORISM OR YOUR WORD-WAR-WORD STOPS IT. PSE BE SUPPORTIVE TO BASIC TRUTH-EVENT- EVIL PREVENTIVENESS. THE BASIC OF DEMOCRACY- RULE OF LAW ALL POWER AND AUTHORITY WOULD BE DRIVEN FROM THE LAW.FOR SPECIAL OPERATION YOU HAVE SPECIAL EQUIPMENT SO FOR SPECIAL TERRORISM- SPECIAL LAW SO SIMPLE. PSE VISIT THE VICTIMS OF TERRORISM- WHAT THEY HAVE TO SAY. WHEN YOU SUFFER THE PAIN YOU WOULD ASK FOR RELIEF. NO INDIAN IS BAD. NO IDIAN CRUALE ALL ARE EXCELLENT HUMAN. BUT INDIAN WOULD NOT ALLOW SOME ONE TO KILL THEM AT LIKE THAT OR AT WIMS AND FANCY IF NOT TODAY IN FUTURE LAW WILL HAVE TO BE MADE TO DEAL SUCH SITUATION. -SPECIAL VEHICLE-AIRCARFT-FOOD-WEAPON -DRESSES-THAN WHY NOT SPECIAL LAWS? JAI HIND
Our PM Dr M M Singh is the nest PM we ever had. We pray for his quick recovery. I am sure his absence will be felt badly at such a time as terrorists attack/financial meltdown/scandals. He certainly had done well in all spheres of life. Even though Aam admi is being projected as the next PM, I am sure if congress is coming back to power, Dr M M Singh will still be the PM. In this respect, I am sure Madame will once again exhibit the wisdom she displayed when she asked De MMS to the post of PM.
Re: Our PM Dr MMSingh.
by gagan bhanot on Jan 24, 2009 01:02 PM
Great cooments all the best wishes to MMS......it was very crucial time faced by congress party and i am damn sure this economic crisis would have an major impact if BJP govt were in charge.......
Re: Re: Our PM Dr MMSingh.
by Man on Jan 27, 2009 06:01 AM
Gagan, Do you even know what is economic crisis? Why we have it? And whats Govt role in it? ... stop bsing...
The betrayal of the Congress led UPA government headed by MMS of the Hindu majority community in India, and the politically motivated framing of nationalist groups who had taken it upon themselves to take on the terrorist groups head on ( a job in which the government had time and again proved its ineptitude) has come back to haunt them. Though I wish the PM recovers well and soon, this should make everybody realize the truth of 'Karma'. Misdeeds in the form of petty politicking, squandering staunch nationalist interests, shall come to haunt the perpetrators, their progeny, the perpetrators' associates, and their progeny, and maybe even the progeny of their progeny till Kingdom come.
