Acquittal due to lack of proof does not mean the person is innocent.
Besides, due to the sluggish and corrupt nature of our judiciary, we Hindus bear the brunt of the system.
At least when a muslim is caught, right or wrong, his community fights tooth and nail in his favour. What about us? If Pragya and Purohit are proven to be innocent, will the govt provide an apology?
Re: Hmm
by S S on Jan 02, 2009 06:19 PM
1. World's Muslim population is around 20% but more than 95% of the native and international terrorists are Muslims. What is the reason? 2. If Muslims are in majority in a country, they won't let minorities live peacefully [Ex: Indonesia, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Egypt, etc.], and if Muslims are in minority they resort to separatism and terrorism [Thailand, Philippines, India, China, Russia, USA, etc]. 3. Muslims always try to convert non-Muslims in the secular countries, but they don't let a Muslim in Islamic countries to convert into other religions. There are strict anti-conversion laws. Why? Even if a Muslim converts into other religions, he faces death threats. Why? 4. If Islam is a peaceful religion, why they militate against non-Muslims [you don't need proof for this. It is happening throughout the world.] 5. It is not fair to single one religion for terrorism, but unfortunately followers of Islam are outstanding in this regard throughout the history of the world. Why? 6. Muslims are too ready to go and settle in places like USA and European countries. But they make it very difficult for non-Muslims to settle in Muslim countries. Why? 7. How many scientists and technocrats Islam has produced? Very Few. But how many terrorists Islam produces? Almost 100%
All these are may not be innocent. These so called MPs might have bribed the judiciary and got them acquitted. This angle should be probed. Further, it is said by one of the so called innocent "He also revealed that even her married sister faced lot of harassment by her in-laws and was subjected to mental torture as 'sister of a terrorist'" - it means that their in-laws were in doubt of character of this guy. Since, if he was so innocent, why their relatives will doubt him. This has once again to be checked.
