Why is rediff or anybody worried about who will succeed the devil? Whosoever it is will make life hell for all nonmuzzzlims. Why give such ppl publicity
Re: Re: is
by ankit kulshrestha on Aug 07, 2009 06:19 PM
Dont abuse him. He has put his view point and an alternate debate. If u dont agree then counter rather than loathing venom on public forums.
Re: Re: Re: Re: is
by ankit kulshrestha on Aug 07, 2009 06:24 PM
If speaking my mind and sanity makes me someone's bro then b it..! I dont agree with him but m not getting personal either.
Re: Re: Re: Re: is
by Avinash on Aug 07, 2009 06:25 PM
antony, I also agree with ankit on this point. Instead of personally abusing any one, counter their arguments in a civilized language. After all we do not know each other. This is just shadow fighting!!
Re: HIS PANCH HIS PACHEES . ANYONE OF THEM
by antony on Aug 07, 2009 06:09 PM
gud s*h*e will get 31 untouched boyz, other wise s*h*e had to make do with this im*pot*ent baitulla
Re: moha
by ankit kulshrestha on Aug 07, 2009 06:07 PM
whoz bending 5 times..u mean namaz? Get real...not all men r evil..no religion is evil. Its ullu like baitullu who r demons.
Re: His second wife!!!
by Avinash on Aug 07, 2009 06:04 PM
His second wife also perished in the Drone attack. That poor gir1 married him about a year back only.
Re: @ mahe
by mahe on Aug 07, 2009 06:06 PM
leaveme....why did the asi do that? could they and the 800million hindusin india could not find a single proof of existence ofram??????
Re: Re: @ mahe
by Avinash on Aug 07, 2009 06:10 PM
mahe, then you should also be aware that the ASI withdrew their Affidavit. Why do you always talk non-sense?
Of course, so far as I believe, Ram existed but he was only a Noble King.
There is no proof for the existence of any g0d. Forget about Indian or Arab g0ds.
Re: Re: Re: Re: @ mahe
by Avinash on Aug 07, 2009 06:27 PM
Then what makes you believe that submission of affidavit itself was not due to some other pressure? (Possibly from the "soul harvesters")!!
Re: Re: @ mahe
by Asim Mehtani on Aug 07, 2009 06:11 PM
We have a proof, and we have already proved the existence of Ram. Why ASI did, that is different question with different perception ? If ASI did, that does not mean that Lord Ram did not exist. We believe in freedom, and that is the beauty.
Re: @ mahe
by Asim Mehtani on Aug 07, 2009 06:07 PM
The existence of Ram or Allah cannot be decided in the court of law, as their existence never possessed the legal bindings. Lord Ram or Allah never wants anyone's certificate about their existence. It is just a matter of common sense.
Re: Re: @ mahe
by ankit kulshrestha on Aug 07, 2009 06:10 PM
More than common sense, its faith. Its faith that defies even the common sense when it comes to religion.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @ mahe
by ankit kulshrestha on Aug 07, 2009 06:27 PM
I disagree...ur eyes dont always see what thy want to see. If someone's impartial, then he can look into things. Truth is not subjective, but at the end of the day, its either yes or no. No one is right..no one is wrong..its the perception.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @ mahe
by Asim Mehtani on Aug 07, 2009 06:17 PM
Faith and common sense are deeply related to each others. You cannot apply your common sense, if you do not have a faith.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @ mahe
by Asim Mehtani on Aug 07, 2009 06:42 PM
Mr. Ankit
Faith comes from your heart, and common sense comes from your brain. If there is good understanding between your brain and heart, then it is a true faith. Otherwise the person will be confused everytime.
Re: Re: Re: Re: @ mahe
by ankit kulshrestha on Aug 07, 2009 06:16 PM
I agree....most of the holy books r nothing but fairy tales...but whatz important is to filter out the content..whtz good n whtz relevant. I believe in Gita but dont care less as to where it came from or who actually wrote it..but every word of it is so true.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @ mahe
by Asim Mehtani on Aug 07, 2009 06:31 PM
The contents in Gita was delivered by Lord Kirshna to Arjun before the commencement of war. The contents written in Gita are evergreen, and are appliable to everyone in this word. It is a matter of just analyzation.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @ mahe
by Avinash on Aug 07, 2009 06:23 PM
Gita has another background. It was a later day addition to Mahabharata, intended to wake up the lazy Kings of our Country when the X'tians spanned the world with their PAPAL BULL to conquer the entire world for their Jesuss and the Musliims spread out to conquer the world with their swords for reclaiming the same for their "most merciful creator". At that time the Indian kings were fighting among themselves for trivial matters.
Re: Re: Re: Re: @ mahe
by Asim Mehtani on Aug 07, 2009 06:14 PM
Fairy Tales is different with holy books. There is nothing harm in believing the holy books so long the other human beings are not harmed.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @ mahe
by Avinash on Aug 07, 2009 06:20 PM
Mr.Asim Mehtani, you are talking like this only because you are not aware of the ideologies of the Abrahamic faiths (or the contents of their b00ks).
These poor guys are taught that the entire planet earth belongs to their "most merciful creator" and it is their bounden duty to reclaim the same from the infidels. Some of these guys (like Dr. Zakir Naik) says that right from Adam every humnbeing was a Mus1im where as the re1igiion itself came into existence whent their Prft Mohd was about 40 years of age.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @ mahe
by Asim Mehtani on Aug 07, 2009 06:27 PM
Dear Avinash
You are expressing the views be keeping the particular aspects in your mind. May be you are correct if based on that particular aspect. But I want to highlight the concept of our philosophies to compare. Leave this faith or religious issues for the time being. Just thinks, that Mr. Mahe was arguing that why some of our ancestors supported our country's enemies. May be he is correct in saying. But he has forgotten to mention, that we never endoresed those ancestors, who were traitors. We never endorsed Jaichands, but the views of Mahes were reflecting that he has a full of endorsement of MirZafars. That a difference, I want to cite to him.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @ mahe
by rehan shafi on Aug 08, 2009 11:10 PM
mr mehtani u not understanding that all were muslims and islam came wen prophet was at 40. the person who believes in oness of god is muslim