Discussion Board View article

Total 0 message Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Vishvaksenah
Nehru and Edwina
by Vishvaksenah on Nov 19, 2008 12:04 PM

......account of a dinner hosted by Nehru the day Edwina Mountbatten died, when, in a magnificent display of self-control......

Ijust cant understand the above sentence.
What is "the magnificent display of self control" all about?


    Forward  |  'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
Vishvaksenah
Re: nehru led to BLOODBATH in partition
by Vishvaksenah on Nov 19, 2008 12:09 PM
Tut...tut..
Give credit to whom it belongs.

Beloved Bapuji, father of present day India is the man responsible who brought J.Nehru to the front.
When the majority of the leaders assembled wanted Sardar Patel to be the PM, it was our beloved Bapuji in a true 'democratic' fashion over ruled the majority decisiona nd foisted 'Chacha'.
'India shall be divided over my dead body' -beloved Bapuji told.
But when partition, beloved Bapuji forgot his earlier words.
Beloved Bapuji is the main person responsible for partition.
Please dont take this credit from him.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Parthaananda Subho
INA, Netaji and India's Freedom
by Parthaananda Subho on Nov 19, 2008 11:55 AM  | Hide replies

It was INA lead by Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose was the main reason for India's freedom. The true patriot and real leader of India's freedom was Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose. Even when Netaji was Congress President (1938-39), he drafted all the methodology about Planning Commission for India's progress when India will become free. March to Delhi, Jai Hind and glory to Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose for ever


    Forward  |  Report abuse
sanjib jha
Re: INA, Netaji and India's Freedom
by sanjib jha on Nov 19, 2008 12:00 PM
partho ji its true he was great leader but he was also betrayer he took support of japan who was also planning to invade bharat and it was not due to netaji which india get freedom....he was no near at time of 1942 its was only due to one man mahatam.....if killing and bombing would have freed india then there are many country wher by gun and bomb they can free there land great example is kashmir

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Ravi Ram
Re: INA, Netaji and India's Freedom
by Ravi Ram on Nov 19, 2008 12:12 PM
jha ji...ek baat batao..bhagat singh..subhas bose..rasbihari bose..vinayak savarkar....inhone azadi ke liye jistarah socha aur kaam kiya..aur kisine kiya hain kya? mahatma did a all time shett by asking dominion status...what is that??? do you see anything except greed in their moves??...aur rahi azadi ki baat...mahatma/nehru and congress azadi nehi laaye...angrez pressure me aaye the because of world war and INA.....

   Forward   |   Report abuse
sanjib jha
Re: INA, Netaji and India's Freedom
by sanjib jha on Nov 19, 2008 12:21 PM
now after there day all these things will be said y not brithis name any other persons for freedom u dont know he was consderd for nobel prize then but british oppose him..i think u must read a ban book if you find from anywhere written by gopal godse brother of nathuram who from jail written in book " Main gandhi ko natmastak pranam karta hoon..aisa haar ka bana insaan phir kabhi ish dharti per ayega mughe sandeh hai,,,and then he give reason to kill gandhi",,you like it or not nehru as a pm led a strong foundation for new india

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Guest
Nehru The Modern Indian
by Guest on Nov 19, 2008 11:43 AM  | Hide replies

I think Nehru's contribution to maker of madern India is under valued under-appreciated.He was in a position to start 'dynastic rule, autocratic rule' but he desisted from it. Had his successor Shastri not died probably Indira would have been another Vijaylakshmi Pandit.The modern democratic India stands tall amongst all nations who gained freedom in the mid 20th century. It was because of him India stablised wile all our neighbors had blood shed and instability. Armed force were kept away from politics, development projects like dams, steel plants IITs IIMs Aiims were set up as models for the future generations.
Yes he was blind to Socialism and Chine. Had we opted for US friendshil we could have progressed faste, gained more than what we gained due to Russion friendship and non-aligned.HE HAD GOOD CMs AND TOLERATED THEIR DEFIANCE OF CENTRE THUS BUILT UP SECOND STRING LEADERS BUT INDIRA DID NOT ACCEPT STRONG CMs HENCE WE SUFFERED CRISIS IN LEADERSHIP AFTER HER DEATH.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
indian
Re: Re: Nehru The Modern Indian
by indian on Nov 19, 2008 11:51 AM
Rajiv Khan was never interested in IT. His only interest was online pornography which he used to watch with Quotrocchi.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
sanjib jha
Re: Nehru The Modern Indian
by sanjib jha on Nov 19, 2008 11:53 AM
yaa and ur parents so i think of which u r product lol, and thats y u r here to post ur comments lol

   Forward   |   Report abuse
rajiv
Re: Nehru The Modern Indian
by rajiv on Nov 19, 2008 12:00 PM
WELL SAID MR INDIAN. AT FIRST WE HAVE TO SHOT THIS TYPE OF IDIOT MAN LIKE SANJIB JHA).

Forward   |   Report abuse
INDIAN PEPSI
Re: Nehru The Modern Indian
by INDIAN PEPSI on Nov 19, 2008 12:00 PM
Dear Indian,

You are absolutely correct. There are so many peoples (congresski Chamchas) thinking Nehru Family is invented India.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
sanjib jha
Re: Nehru The Modern Indian
by sanjib jha on Nov 19, 2008 12:12 PM
yaa i think so foundation led by great nehru for this nation can not be ignored and then indira gandhi whom sangh p;arivar also describe her as Durga become strong prime minister,who can dare operation in religios places where militant took shelter.i think no one can dare but she did and lost her life...then the new vision Prime minister who know that tim e without IT we can not survive on 21st century make a revolution in IT,where india has become the IT power, after him we didnot see any major revolution and this country is running ram baharose our Iron man Advani ji was praising Jinha in pakistan

Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Nitin Dutt
Re: Nehru The Modern Indian
by Nitin Dutt on Nov 19, 2008 12:04 PM
"As long as Britishers were in India, there were not even 1 single riots, and after that our country witnessed several."

Are you dumb or plain ignorant about what was happenning in India pre independance. Do you know first ever Hindu Muslim divide was created by English when they sponsored a caste based censor way back in 1860 and then a caste based electoral. It was still igmorant ppl like you who saw merit in it and that was the cause of teh fragmentation of the Indian society.
nehru wante to sit on throne of India is also misleading as Jinnah could have never become PM and Nehru certainly was not scared of him.
Agreed he made mistakes but then every action does not result in righful culmination. We have to understand the conditions prevaling at that particular juncture of time analyse a decision. Does all your decisions in your house result in right direction. have you never failed in achaiving anything in your life, if yes then you are lying.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Hindustani
Re: Nehru The Modern Indian
by Hindustani on Nov 19, 2008 11:58 AM
Very Good but facts on Nehtu Khan and pirated Gandhi Family who is source of many current problems also.we may face another parition if congress continue in power.
suddenly rediff start campaigning for Nehru .Is it Congress sponsord site ?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Vivek Dev
Re: Nehru The Modern Indian
by Vivek Dev on Nov 22, 2008 12:51 AM
The British united India. Had the British not established the Raj, India would never have come into existence.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
sanjib jha
HIII
by sanjib jha on Nov 19, 2008 11:41 AM  | Hide replies

Nehru was the graet leader its sangh parivar and left who are defaming him.he done a great job for india

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Rahul Pathak
Re: HIII
by Rahul Pathak on Nov 19, 2008 12:05 PM
he did a good job with Lady M 2

   Forward   |   Report abuse
sanjib jha
Re: HIII
by sanjib jha on Nov 19, 2008 12:13 PM
i thinkj ur there at that time to be eywitnes,,what about kabooter bazi done by most of sangh parivar leader

   Forward   |   Report abuse
indian
Re: HIII
by indian on Nov 19, 2008 11:44 AM
You are doing another great job by licking shoes of Nehru and his pirated gandhi clan.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
sanjib jha
Re: HIII
by sanjib jha on Nov 19, 2008 11:51 AM
OFCOURSE not as you doing of advaniji against whom her won daughter in law has made charges,Give me any one example that sangh parivar has done anything good for the country

   Forward   |   Report abuse
SSSSS
Re: HIII
by SSSSS on Nov 19, 2008 11:55 AM
Go and learn some history. Read about contributions of RSS and Sangh Pariwar during world war reliefs, calamities and droughts.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
sanjib jha
Re: HIII
by sanjib jha on Nov 19, 2008 12:03 PM
SSSS is yaa i dont know history u teach me i want to know what was there contribution..i dont want to name here person of sangh parivar who on times of freedopm strugle inspite of going to jail become agent of brtitish i think ur knowledge is good and u must know him who was he

   Forward   |   Report abuse
indian
Re: HIII
by indian on Nov 19, 2008 11:54 AM
Ek aur CHH** congress ka "SANJIB JHA"

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Ravi Ram
nehru was a big F
by Ravi Ram on Nov 19, 2008 11:39 AM  | Hide replies

its true...Sardar Patel would have been much much much better person than this greedy fellow...whole life he oiled and oiled gandhi for the pm post...he s nothing but a big F

    Forward  |  Report abuse
sanjib jha
Re: nehru was a big F
by sanjib jha on Nov 19, 2008 11:44 AM
before coming to power advani is was also projected as iron man of india what happend fuss fuss,went to pakistan and praise jinah and hard core leader who dare to challenge him expelled from the party, like govindacharya,umaji

   Forward   |   Report abuse
SSSSS
Re: nehru was a big F
by SSSSS on Nov 19, 2008 11:56 AM
I am not pro-Advani, but against Nehru. Reason? He screwed up India for what it is now.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
sanjib jha
Re: nehru was a big F
by sanjib jha on Nov 19, 2008 12:05 PM
NO WHAT IS INDIA TODAY BECAUSE OF HIM..SE SOUTH ASIA POSTION TODAY,,WE ARE NOT ONLY STRONGER THEN THEM BUT ALSO MAJOR NATION IN WORLD BOTH AS POWER AND ECONOMY

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
indian
Re: Con-gress Party 1947
by indian on Nov 19, 2008 11:45 AM
TRUE
India witnessed bloodshed of 1947 just because Nehru Khan wanted to sit on the throne of Independant India.
Jinnah (Indian before 1947) knew very well that Nehru khan (mamu Nehru) will succeed in brain washing indians by using ALIAS "pandit nehru" ALIAS "Chacha Nehru".
He knew very well that Nehru will never allow muslims to represent India ( although Nehru was himself a muslim mullah masquarading as a Hindu).
Pakistan was created and to add fire to this misery, his corrupt daughter Indira Khan gifted POK to Pakistan and signed official papers in Shimla Agreement.
95% of all major problems in current India were the visions of Corrupt Nehru Khan and his PIRATED clan which was executed in different stages by Congress.
However, I am glad that people of India have woken up and can realise that Nehru was nothing but a PLAYBOY who was flirting around with Mountbattens Wife when daughters and mothers of Independant India were getting
murdered and raped in 1947 riots.
CONGRESS was the major disaster for India. As long as Britishers were in India, there were not even 1 single riots, and after that our country witnessed several. 1947/ 1984/ Even Gujrat Riots were designed and executed by Congress just for the sake of wooing muslims into Congress.
VOTE FOR ANY OTHER PARTY, but make sure that CONGRESS and their PIRATED GANDHIS along with bootlicker criminals and terrorists never come into power again otherwise situation in india will be worse than in Palistine or Pakistan.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Karan Hi
Sincere Request
by Karan Hi on Nov 19, 2008 11:37 AM  | Hide replies

All the people who believe in dynsaty rule of congress need to get thier IQ level tested.



    Forward  |  Report abuse
Karan Hi
Re: Sincere Request
by Karan Hi on Nov 19, 2008 11:38 AM
Well the results are 32 % of them are below median level of intelligence.
Balance showed no Intelligence at all ?


   Forward   |   Report abuse
indian
Re: Sincere Request
by indian on Nov 19, 2008 11:45 AM
India witnessed bloodshed of 1947 just because Nehru Khan wanted to sit on the throne of Independant India.
Jinnah (Indian before 1947) knew very well that Nehru khan (mamu Nehru) will succeed in brain washing indians by using ALIAS "pandit nehru" ALIAS "Chacha Nehru".
He knew very well that Nehru will never allow muslims to represent India ( although Nehru was himself a muslim mullah masquarading as a Hindu).
Pakistan was created and to add fire to this misery, his corrupt daughter Indira Khan gifted POK to Pakistan and signed official papers in Shimla Agreement.
95% of all major problems in current India were the visions of Corrupt Nehru Khan and his PIRATED clan which was executed in different stages by Congress.
However, I am glad that people of India have woken up and can realise that Nehru was nothing but a PLAYBOY who was flirting around with Mountbattens Wife when daughters and mothers of Independant India were getting
murdered and raped in 1947 riots.
CONGRESS was the major disaster for India. As long as Britishers were in India, there were not even 1 single riots, and after that our country witnessed several. 1947/ 1984/ Even Gujrat Riots were designed and executed by Congress just for the sake of wooing muslims into Congress.
VOTE FOR ANY OTHER PARTY, but make sure that CONGRESS and their PIRATED GANDHIS along with bootlicker criminals and terrorists never come into power again otherwise situation in india will be worse than in Palistine or Pakistan.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 0 message Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Write a message