On all the news and comments posted below it at rediff, first for last one month, I first observed every now and then Moslem and Islamic fundamentalism is been heately infact literally torn apart...then gradually news coverage of every event from SIGNING NUCLEAR DEAL, TIBBET ISSUE, OIL PRICE HIKE, FAILING TO GIVE SHELTER TO TASLIMA NASRIN SARABJIT SINGH BEING ORDERED TO HANG IN PAKISTAN CHINA'S DEMAND FOR ARUNACHAL PRADESH has been beutifully given such a shape to show failure of present UPA government..Infact it was directly/indirectly labelled Pro Muslim, Jihadi supporter, and kneeling infront of Communist parties(which are supporting china, at this this what everyone is shouting )... Then at the bottom of every news, few particular guys are emphasizing at the failure of UPA and it is being antinational..then giving solution for either EARLY ELECTION OR BRINGING BJP OR OTHER SUCH PARTIES IN POWER IN FORTHCOMING ELECTIONS... and now some more ground prepration by above news... "We are no longer untouchable for Muslims: BJP"
Whats cooking man?
Why turning guns at UPA now at this particular time... Besides It is not good strategy to divert your guns from critiszing Islam and muslims to only UPA Government...these bloody ISLAMISTS are more dangerous than anything in this country.... Don't consider them for election etc...just point and shoot...thats what they are worth for....
Two former reps of the two former governments of India and US differ today over the Nuke deal of today.Whether there was talk or no talk of the Nuke deal that is being discussed today is immeterail. What is important is the Nuke deal brokered is in the best interest of the country. But the forces inimical towards it say, the Red brigade is oppositing tooth and nail. Not because they are unhappy with it but because it is being done with US, the sworn enemy of communist world. If the same agreement were to be signed with either communist China or Russia, the Red Brigade would have no problem. The general public is at a loss to understand what their prime objections to the deal when the energy crisis is taking a heavy toll of all the state governments. The communists must understand that there is an urgent need to harness nuclear energy for peaceful purposes and it is this deal that will solve all the problems. When such is the case why are they opposed to it. Public demands an explanation. What is the sovereing question that is being compromised by the Govt by signing the agreement. Are Manmohand and company are not Indians and not concerned with it than the Communists? No saner PM will ever be ready to sign a deal that will undermine the soverignity of the country. They are as much interested inthe safeguards as the Communists. But then one fails to understand the objections of the communits to the deal unless they clear the clouds. The public is awaiting a response to them.
RE:RE:Sinha or Talbott : What is wrong with the present deal.
by Proud Indian on Mar 20, 2008 04:25 PM
Hello, I think you have raised the right points. The fact is the nuclear deal is good for India. I do have a coutner-point as well. The US nuclear power industry is looking with glee at India. I dont want a situation where the US nuclear power industry will swamp India with high cost power solutions. I dont want India to be burdened with cost of power jumping up multiple fold. I would like the US nuclear power companies to form JV with Indian companies, and I am sure the Indian companies will keep the costs down.
While we need US nuclear cooperation, we must also realize that the US brings in mad consumerism, wanton greed and other noxious forms of greed.
We must pick and choose what we want and what is best for us.
RE:Sinha or Talbott : What is wrong with the present deal.
by balaji ramani on Mar 19, 2008 10:27 PM
Jamsheed Bhai,
You are asking the wrong question but to the right people. The communists are not opposed to the Nuke deal because they want to, but because they are forced to by China. China openly says that it has no objection to the deal, but clandestinely creates trouble for the Govt through the communists who are largely funded by Beijing. The communist dogs bark at the beck and call of its master in Beijing. Can any one of the so-called leaders of the left including Karat, Yechury, Bardhan, Basu etc. give specific reasons why they oppose the deal. They cant and they wont. They will say that it is better to go without electricity rather than to subject our Nuclear facilities to inspection by IAEA. But they dont care about the farmers who lose irrigation, students who cant study, the small businessman who cant run his factory because there is no electricity.
The Commies are in power in only 3 of the 25 states of India, but with such a small minority of people's votes they have held the entire nation to ransom. The UPA govt. is so spineless that it cannot even challenge them and dissolve the Parliament and go to mid-term polls.
RE:Sinha or Talbott : What is wrong with the present deal.
by anil b on Mar 20, 2008 03:18 AM
HI ,
It shows when people vote for unprincipled scoundrels like lallu , karunanidhi , pawar and fringe cheats like TNS guys . add a few more like mulayam, chandra babu and the criminal possesion of our parliment is complete not to forget about those criminals in congress and Bjp . I guess only God can save our country.
RE:Sinha or Talbott : What is wrong with the present deal.
by Nitin Dutt on Mar 20, 2008 11:37 AM
Do we have a choice?? No, ppl who stand for elections are only criminals very few leutrates fight & win elections. except a few in parliament who do not have any visual criminal record. But there is no mechanism because there is no participation ofthe Indians in this process. if omeone from ur own locality who is willing to work contests elections we will first mock him and then go on to elect congi or BJP or some other idiot but make sure that he us defeated by a huge margin.
In the last line Mr. Srrenivasan says:'It takes statesmen to see beyond political expediency and accept what is in the best interests of their country.' But the moot question is what can any statesman achieve when the lalbhais are hellbent on preventing agreements that are beneficial to the nation? The only solution is that the people of country should teach them a lesson by rejecting the reds and their suicidal policies in the next elections. Taral
RE:Talbot is right, so is Sinha
by Prakash Asrani on Mar 19, 2008 11:03 PM
I agree with your reasoning. Only additional point is that even SaffronbhaiS are also in the same boat as lalbhais and worse, the same saffornbhais would have,as per Talbott, accepted much less than what is offered today. No wonder Jaswantbhai's BOLTI is BANDH and Sinhabhai is coming forward to defend what is not defendable.
RE:Talbot is right, so is Sinha
by Nirpinder Singh on Mar 19, 2008 09:44 PM
Perfectly true that it takes statesmen but the statesmanship necessarily involves carrying along your own countrymen. If you are unable to agree with citizens of your own nation then what good is it having an agreement with a foreign nation? Presuming that one party knows what is good for the whole nation is a dangerous thing in a democracy and should be abhorred.
RE:Rediff is anti BJP
by Ghanasham on Mar 19, 2008 09:31 PM
I thing Mr. Strobe Talbott is right. At the time of BJP Govt., The RSS the mouth piece of BJP was ready to give Kashmir Valley to Pak by carving it out for Indo-Pak settlement. That why Mr. Bajpei is favourit of Mr. Musheraf. Though they have managed economic front very vell. But National interest should be on Top.
RE:RE:Rediff is anti BJP
by All Right on Mar 22, 2008 02:34 PM
Mr. Ghansham. Why bring Talbott into it? Say what's cooking in your heart! Rule No. 1 - Sonia is always right. BJP is ALWAYS wrong. Rule No. 2 - If BJP is right and/or if Sonia is wrong, refer Rule No. 1.
RE:Rediff is anti BJP
by Amal Roy on Mar 19, 2008 08:26 PM
Yes Srinivas, you may be right since this must be loaded with congress .lickers and .splineless who do not have any worth while leaders for the support of this country
