Discussion Board

Diana, Dodi were murdered: Al Fayed


Total 10 messages Pages | 1
Ajit Birdi
Diana, Dodi were murdered
by Ajit Birdi on Feb 21, 2008 06:53 PM

90% of the public believe that the royal family of UK had a hand in the accident of Diana and Dodi, they do not believe that it was an accident but it was a staged and well thought operation.
Unlike Sarah Ferguson's title, Diana's title of princess Royal was not revoked and she was a A HRH (Her royal Highness) and no one could remove her title not even the queen. this was to be debated and a bill passed in the parliament only then she would be commoner, again she will remain a princess as she was from a royal family.
after marrying Dodi who was a muslim hany child born was in automatic line of the the throne of UK and would be king if both sons of Charles and Diana, Harry and William died.
The Royals did not want any Muslim blood in the family and Diana was removed,beside that Diana was more popular and powerful around the world then queen who was loosing out thats is what every one believe.
All those who were on Diana's side believe that AL Fayad is correct in saying that Diana and Dodi were murdered by the royals but no one is ready to voice there concern in fear of retaliation.The truth will come out after 50 years under freedom of information act by then all who will be needed to answer the question would have died and the public will have forgotten the Saga.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
John Corniche
Muslims love conspiracies ... phew !
by John Corniche on Feb 19, 2008 05:58 PM

Mohd Fayed ...

is no exception inspite being a learned man !

They all love conspiracies; they don't believe in the judicial process of the govts; they make allegations which are faith-based & not with any credible proof.

But on the other hand, back in Egypt, the same Fayed will accept all atrocities & all verdicts from the Hosni Mubarak govt, which is corrupt and misuses power on a routine basis.

People like Fayed should learn to respect the people of their residence, respect laws of the land (in this case UK) and live peacefully.

Otherwise, we will have battles for simplest of the cases which will be faith-based.

Loss of human being is always sad & hence, to trivialise this into public-slanging match is ridiculous.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
mahesh  lakshminarayan
Candle not in the Wind but in Ocean.
by mahesh lakshminarayan on Feb 19, 2008 05:54 PM  | Hide replies

Lady Diana was a good person. She is a very good Social Helper. But she had many affairs which created a royal catastrophe for her. She should have atleast thought from her Children%u2019s point of view. It was not only a religious conflict she really paid for but also for her romantic spree with her boyfriends. Forget Royal Family%u2019s even Normal Family%u2019s will do the same if they found their blood connections doing insanity against them. But it was very harsh to murder her in such a pathetic way and in pathetic condition. Finally its all about Tit for Tat she did with her First Husband Prince Charless.By the way its not an Egyptian Muslim step father scenario or any other which would have created a havoc. It can be the mistakes of the Royal Kingdom which would have thrown to light if she was alive. There is a saying "When Queens Throb has Trouble even the Near Ones Pays Dear%u201D. This is total bullshit,as there is no more kingdom and rule in present world other than Democracy.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Ajit Birdi
RE:RE:Candle not in the Wind but in Ocean.
by Ajit Birdi on Feb 21, 2008 06:56 PM
If you had seen the interviev with Diana on the tell which was broadcast live, you would not say that.The main culprit was Charles it was him who started fi8rst and had a an affair long before he got married which carried on even after the marriage.
Diana did have affairs no doubt about it but it was Charlee who led her into others arms.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
JGN
Evils of human society and their solution
by JGN on Feb 19, 2008 05:51 PM

Human society was divided on lines of caste, creed, color and tribes, and consequently was plunged into the valley of conflicts and tribulations. Caste based on birth was propounded by vested interests, guided by the principle of selfish pleasure and geo-socio-economic sentiments with the sole motives to perpetuate economic exploitation over the ignorant mass. Same is the case with racial sentiments. The "purity" and vanity of racial superiority associated with religious dogmas is a glaring case of vested interest psychology.

It is irrational, illogical, conservative and dogmatic to divide humanity on the bases of external differences. This sort of psychology is the product of evil forces. How to get rid of this sort of mentality and establish a universal social order? If right thinking people and well-wishers of the society wanted to form a peaceful world order, the following factors should be integrated:

(1) universal social outlook based on Neo-Humanism

(2) availability and guarantee of minimum requirements of life

(3) common penal code based on cardinal principles of life

(4) a progressive and rational socio-economic theory

(5) social codes of conduct for justice, discipline and social solidarity

(6) logical and scientific views of life and world free from dogmas and superstitions

(7) a spiritual-moralist leadership free from geo or class sentiments


    Forward  |  Report abuse
susi soni
diana -jodha
by susi soni on Feb 19, 2008 05:29 PM

i feel the british royalty could never tolerate a chritian queen having an affair with a turk muslim and later were to marry, do the muslims think the british can be submisive like the indians giving their daughter to the invaders as a security anda loyalty as jodha were given in a shameful way, why should british royalty mess with an alian reliogion, having world wide fear, does he feel himself as shahenshah akbar.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
Message deleted by moderator
Jonas DSouza
RE:Why say it again and again, Mohammad al Fayed
by Jonas DSouza on Feb 19, 2008 05:40 PM
"well lets wait for someone in your family to die then lets see how quiet you are ...dumbass!"

First, let us see you allow your daughter-in-law to loitter around with play-boys ! Death came much after her loittering !


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Total 10 messages Pages: | 1
Write a message