This is an excellent report questioning the NEERI Impact assessment. Swamy and others should file a case for environmental vandalism , which is a fact and happening right now. This will hold a lot of water. See web site below
RE:Swamy should fight the case on the basis of environment
by tamilan on Oct 24, 2007 01:25 PM
NEERI already cleared the project. As per NEERI's report no environmental changes would be witnessed along the east coast after comletion of Ram sethu project.
RE:Swamy should fight the case on the basis of environment
by Gajanan Mohite on Oct 25, 2007 05:03 AM
http://www.greensl.net/docs/petition%20sethusamudram%20by%20jesu%20(04.12.04).doc
Read this word by word. The Board members are not fools. They are based in Chennai. Remember salt water is a better heat transfer medium than water. This heat is enough for one to destroy the environment, when the ships pass by. The report questions the project word by word. In case you do not have the report , please give your email , I can send it as an attachment. Ossie Fernandes is from Chennai and he is from Coastal Action Network.
RE:RE:Swamy should fight the case on the basis of environment
by Gajanan Mohite on Oct 25, 2007 05:06 AM
The NEERI report is flawed , that is what this report is questioning. Read this report word by word. If you are in Chennai , just visit their office and have a talk with them
COASTAL ACTION NETWORK
Contact Addresses
Jesu Rethinam, 546, Selva Prabha Complex, Public Office Road, Velippalayam, Nagapattinam %u2013 611 001.
RE:Swamy should fight the case on the basis of environment
by tamilan on Oct 25, 2007 02:05 PM
It is a draft of petition filed before high court of Madras. Please go thro the judgement given by the court. You may agree with me that the high court judges are no fools. www.sethusamudram.gov.in/judgement.asp
RE:Swamy should fight the case on the basis of environment
by Cape Comorin on Oct 24, 2007 01:52 PM
You guys are dropping vianyak idols in sea and lakes. First stop this environmental vandalism.
RE:Swamy should fight the case on the basis of environment
by Manikandan Thirumoorthy on Oct 24, 2007 04:56 PM
and do what?instead put all 'cross_loving' monsters in to the sea.??..
RE:Ram Setu
by its me on Oct 24, 2007 12:48 PM
you will know who bark and who shit Again don't touch Ram Sethu you actuall not get the test of swards so keep your head cool
RE:Ram Setu
by its me on Oct 24, 2007 12:57 PM
Don't distroy ram setu other wise you people will not get chance to flee to shrilanka your orignal land you need to jump into sea
RE:Ram Setu
by tamilan on Oct 24, 2007 01:05 PM
Dear friend, If you really want this mythical ram sethu is not to be detroyed, pl come out with a useful debate supported by technical facts.
RE:RE:Ram Setu
by its me on Oct 24, 2007 01:35 PM
What technical discussion ? when someone go to temple he will not have to get a certificate From ASI whether god existed there or not. it is matter of faith ram setu is mentioned by valmiki Ramayan with accurate geometrical details. And about man made or not one thing to mentioned The amarnath Cave in kashmir is also not man made can you destory it too Respect the faith and about developement by destorying setu is just a big myth. it is acctually enviornment disaster
RE:Ram Setu
by tamilan on Oct 24, 2007 01:50 PM
Dear friend, No environmenatal disaster is expected as per NEERI's report. Valmiki Ramayana is based on some existing places. A place mentioned in a story doesn't mean that the story is true.
RE:Ram Setu
by Ramanath Babu on Oct 24, 2007 01:52 PM
Whatever you say is correct. No one has any right to question someone else faith.
But what is pity about Hindus is that they do not have unity. Even on Ram issue (not on Ram setu issue) they differ. Sonia, Shiela Dixit, PM Man Mohan Singh everybody were a party who supported Karunanidhi in his tirade against Ram and Hinduism. Yet Hindus, unahamedly allow them to participate in this year's ram lila in New Delhgi. The organizers of Ram Lila indeed were spineless. They should have told these VIPs that these Ram Lila is organised for the faithful Hindus and not for people like them. Instead they have received them with respect and allotted them VIP seats! Shame on all Hindus.
RE:Ram Setu
by Cape Comorin on Oct 24, 2007 01:50 PM
So you are using your own brain. That is why you are thinking that some monkeys built a bridge. Good joke!
RE:Ram Setu
by Manikandan Thirumoorthy on Oct 24, 2007 05:04 PM
cape comorin will go to his parents..
will ask his dad and mum to scientifically toexplain..which sprm made his mum pregnent so that this stupid was born..he will believe them only the prove it..then he belives that they are his real parents...poor parents..how can they till him that scientifically to cape comorin that he is the kid they produced..i pity them..hahahah..
so go a head and aks scientific proof for all that you see in this world..if you believ in science i wonder why u didnt becom a scientisit...but you are still sH!ting here y? coz u r following your converted ideology..
Purely on legal basis, this is a silly judgment of the court. Is this the Supreme Court which is saying that "We are not going to interfere with the committee. It is not appointed by the court,"
In that case, the SC cannot interfere anywhere including the caste-quota-reservations committee.
The SC is contradicting its own rulings where it has so many times interfered in many situations which it DID NOT create
RE:RE:Ram
by frankopenion on Oct 24, 2007 11:42 AM
I agree with your observation that Supreme Court shouldn't have rejected this plea. But, I guess, it would have taken up this matter, if this was raised by any person, other than Mr. Subramaniam !!!. All know, what a crap this Subbu is.!!
RE:Ram
by kk on Oct 24, 2007 12:04 PM
Agree on Subramaniam Swamys' part that he has allowed himself to be taken for granted and made a mockery of himself.
But on October 6, the SC had said that the "the formation of the committee was not in conformity with the undertakings given by the government in the Supreme Court"
So, even if the Centre violates what it promised, the SC cannot act ???
This is sheer stupidity on the part of the bench which delivered this judgment.
RE:Ram
by Cape Comorin on Oct 24, 2007 12:43 PM
It all depends on the castes and religions of the judges. If the bench is dominated by brahmins you could see a different judgement supporting myths.
RE:Ram
by VIJAYA BUDDHIRAJU on Oct 24, 2007 06:41 PM
Mr Capee How about if the bench is dominated by your caste-the whole Delhi secretariat will be your god damned caste. It is a monument you idiot-mythology or not.
RE:Sethu project should be continued
by tamilan on Oct 24, 2007 12:13 PM
Nice way of starting an arguement. Perhaps it is still used by LTTE to bombard Srilankan air force bases.
