its very shamful some pepole refer netaji as a terrorist on the basis if some vague definition.. if so then are Bhagt siingh and Rajguru terrorist? i request pepole to read about netaji first and then post your 'valuable' comments.. Jai Hind.
I think the the problel lies in the Indian mentality crying over the split milk.
I dont understand why there is a lot of discussion now. The first one is the press whom is to be blamed, and rest all comes one after another.
There are lot of things in this short life of 60 years to do so make India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh one and try to defeat America and the world and then you would realise whats the real life is.
Have one main aim food, water and electricity for everyone then think about the rest. How can you have economic progress without even providing essentials to people. I think these metro trains, agreemtns with US should thrown in a BIN.
I have a great regard for my country and I am currently serving another country. I would live to leave everything here and come to my country and serve as a social worker rest of my life if the goverment starts thinking of there people first and about economic relations with US second.
I think pakistan is our best friend and I think everytime India is at a fault if we analyse the news carefully, and that is because Indians have the complexion that they are the best which is not the case everytime.
netaji was a terrorist. Anybody who uses terror is terrorist.very simple.if wecosider netaji as freedomfighter, we might as well consider kashmiris and several other movements as freedom struggle.we indians have always the tendency for person or cult worshippng.if we cosider only achieving the goal irrespective of the means to achieve, we would all end up in chaos. As far as partition was concerned, it was good as it was certainly a mass movement and i think it was good for india as all the arab (muslim) cultural influence like purdah etc would be more in the land of kamasutra and kalidas. i donot know how his daughter can crriticise others when her own contribution is nil for india
Re: neta
by muthu on Aug 02, 2011 01:31 PM
If it so u just leave india and stay some where.Then only u will know the taste of india.u know all the other countries are developed after they looted india
Re: neta
by muthu on Aug 02, 2011 01:36 PM
Do u know what is going to happen to ur daughter after u dont critisize bose & get the curse of his follower.Some persons who want to see bose blood was failed but he saw his two decade blood.Do u want to happen to u.
RE:neta
by arunava GHOSH on Aug 21, 2007 12:35 PM
by Arunava Ghosh Aug/21/2007
Mr. Stanley
I realize that you have the genes of the Britishers and that might have provoked you to call Netaji a terrorist.Probably you should go though the pages of Indian history written by Indian writers and not by some foreign imposters,and you should also know that the britishers were just a bunch of money sucking leeches.They ammount they looted is equivalent to more than 1 trillion pounds in today's market.
You have perhaps failed to realize how great stature of a human being Netaji was.
So please do not shit on the same plate in which you are eating.
RE:neta
by Chaitanya Nabar on Feb 09, 2006 07:38 PM
Mr Stanley,
Do you even know what the definition of terrorism is?
Netaji and his INA never even thought of raping innocent British women. They did not blast bombs in public places where crowds of innocent Britishers mingled for festivities. They did not kidnap any innocent British truck-driver and hold him hostage.
And on the other side, neither did people come forward to donate and contribute so generously to any terrorist! Please do not talk about how much the mujahideens are supported in the Valley or how the Taliban & Laden are supported in Afghanistan! That support is peanuts compared to what Netaji got!
And if Netaji was a terrorist for using violence, then Churchill was an even bigger terrorist! Did he not use violence to defeat Hitler?
In any other country, you would have been hanged by now! Consider yourself lucky that you are an Indian!!
Re: RE:neta
by Aftab Ahmad on Sep 11, 2010 11:47 PM
If Stanley is Indian .. His Indian nationality must be revoked? This man donot deserve to be an Indian.
RE:neta------------Netaji
by Abid on Feb 09, 2006 09:41 PM
R u Indian? What is ur contribution towards India?
Before criticising a person as great as Subhas Bose u should know something about him and other revolutionaries. Who were terrorised? Indians or Britishers? The Britishers of course. Why they were terrorised? Is there were any need to terrorise them ? What do u think? I know u will say there was no need to oppose Briishers, they were here for India's benefit. As ur name suggest, u r one of the britishers or at least brainchild of britishers so u urself feel the terror of INA and Netaji as felt by 'Raj' in those days and that is exactly why they were forced to leave India. Kashmiries are terrorising Kashmiries itself so they Indeed are in different role.
Netaji
by Kundan Kumar Lucky on Feb 13, 2006 07:05 PM
Dear Stanley,
Do you know the difference between war and terrorism? If not, it is the right time to learn the difference. And if you think you know this difference then obviously you are totally misled in calling Netaji a terrorist.
BTW, by your "simple" logic, even a Mother punishing her child for having done something wrong is a terrorist. What do you say about this?
Please do not stretch your logic too much. In Philosophy, this is called nonsense and I hope you are well within your sense.
RE:neta
by Jayanto on Mar 20, 2006 11:08 AM
Mr. Stanley,
It seems U R the real terrorist who is accusing a freedom fighter like Netaji to be a terrorist. It is true tht u r still alive b'coz u r in India or else u could have been hanged to death for ur comments.
U r calling a person a terrorist who was called fondly as Netaji for his thinkings and deeds.
So remember twice before u send comments like this in future b'coz ur views and comments shows tht u r anti-national.
This interview by Anita Pfaff is just propaganda. Mukherhee Commission investigating the myterious disapperance of Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose has found that NO aircrash took place at all. There are indications that Netaji had entered into Russian territory. This report is now sitting with the government for the last 2 months and they have still not made it public.
It is quite intriguing that just after this development many articles and comments started appearing all over the net, trying to defame Netaji and reitirate the myth that he died in an aircrash.
Readers, please don't fall for this propaganda. It is known now that Netaji was in russia after the alleged day of the air-crash. The truth cannot be coveredup anymore. Too much information has been unearthed.
Could he have ensured parliamentary democracy? Knowing his extremist views and stubborn nature that is more notorious than Nehru, I am not very sure if we would have been a democracy at all.
RE:Netaji
by Ashish on Feb 01, 2006 11:07 AM
Dear Raj, It seems u have not read anything worthwhile about Netaji. Please read atleast his speaches available on NET. U will realise that he respected and practiced democratic values throuout his life. He surely have stablished Democracy in our country but with a difference. And that is there maight be no place for tratiors and sycophants. Our voice does not go unnoticed in the world community and we may not be treated as a soft state. His dream was revolution in India, which was on the verge of it in 1940's, and the only need of that time was to push it. He wanted not a dictator but a strong party serve the nation(Not rule the nation).
