Discussion Board

Who said what before Nanavati


Total 22 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3   Older >
ED
.
by ED on Aug 11, 2005 09:04 PM

Sikh-Riots
When: 1984
Investigation Report: 2005
Result: A Big Zero - No Convictions

Godhra Riots
When: 2002
Investigation Report: ?
Result: Will be a Big Zero

Resignation is not adequate! Public Stoning IS! For such dastardly acts as instigating mass murder, vigilante justice is the need of the day!

The common man in India has been taken for such a ride that it is impossible to foresee when we would wake up to the fact that people in power need to be made accountable and punishable under law.

I hope we Indians wake up sooner than later...

    Forward  |  Report abuse
chanakya
All said and done.
by chanakya on Aug 11, 2005 06:24 PM

Who is guilty for the murder of 3000 sikhs ?

Has the machinery of law and order and justice of Bharat Varsh just stalled ?

We are worse than even the Third Reich.

Hitlers and Tytlers should be consigned to the same fate.

Y isnt the apex picking up the tab under the banner of a PIL ?

Or, the lives of 3000 sikhs means just nothing to the safed topi ?????

Then we have a criminally indifferent government.

And this is a very dangerous situation for our democracy.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
s.Ramaswamy
Nanavati Commission Report-What people said
by s.Ramaswamy on Aug 11, 2005 05:34 PM

The Congress has managed to deceive people all along that it had no role to play.Even now it claims that the Commission has not found anything against it or its leaders.
What has been reported in the above write up clearly points to a well planned pogrom and nothing less.
Even though Tytler has resigned and the PM has been constrained to take note of he 'sentiments' expressed i the Parliament the party with its charecteristic callousness will try to soft pedal follow up action
This is the party which claims to be tha champion of the minority and raised such a hue and cry against the post Godhra riots.Mere apologies as were said to have been given by the party president,which in any case was only to mollify the Sikh sentiments and not a genuinely felt sentiment,are not enough.The party should publy accept its and its leaders'culpability and leave law to take its course instead of shielding the culprits who are none other than its leading lights
S.Ramaswamy

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Amit Pai
Nanavati Report
by Amit Pai on Aug 11, 2005 04:51 PM

It is a shame that the country had to see such a bloodshed, and it is more shameful to know that the government had a hand in this.

It was very shocking for me to know that Jagdish Tytler had been made a minister inspite of his black character. This is the same Congress which calls the BJP communal.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RAJU RAINA
Ineffecient and corrupt authorities
by RAJU RAINA on Aug 11, 2005 04:41 PM

The classical example of ineffectiveness of our politicians and Buerocracy. They work hand in glove, you save me i will save you attitude has lead us to the extent where we feel ashamed now being called an civilized people. It shows how politicians and buerocrats have managed the president of India. The Congress had held nation at ransom at that time, and with shame they say no one is found guilty. Then who were the person who killed 4000 sikhs. Why didnt they punish the cops and officials for inaction. Instead they were rewarded with plump posts.Then they say we have terrorists here and need commandos for protection for themselevs as innoncent people get killed on the streets. Who created those terrorists in Punjab, kashmir, Andhara Pardesh, Assam, Nagaland and so on the list goes on. Prime minister told in parliment yesterday that Rajiv Gandhi and Longowale were the person who brought peace to Punjab. Let PM tell who brought bloodshed to Panjab. Everybody was saying this PM is gentlemen, i say he's not he is another neta who cannot leave his chair.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 22 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3   Older >
Write a message