Time for honesty. Mush knew. End of story. The Sad part has remained that Indians have been pathetic in influencing the United States about the issues that are important. Pukistan has been able to do so. In fact, they are not below by debasing themselves to lick the collective posteriors of the United States.
The reality remains that no matter what one may think, the fact happens to be that Mush and Pukistan don't pose any type of real or perceived "threat" to the "jobs" of Americans. Pakistan in all honesty has been viewed as a colony of the West, and that India the modern david who took on the goliath of opposing colonialism.
Mush knew. In fact, Mush would never, refuses and shall always refuse to do anything to hinder the islamic terrorists, because the aim of Mush and all Puks, as well as the west shall be the dismemberment of India!
Let's be honest. There are a number of things that should be noted. The most important that Pakistan, aka Pukistan has remained and continues to remain a terrorist nation. Not alleged, but an actual sponsor of terrorism.
Furthermore, the United States, regardless of it's political parties, none have ever been willing to condemn Pakistan's actions, past, present, or in the future. In fact, The entire mindset of the entire United States political elites has remained mired within that of the Cold War. Never mind that Saudi Arabia has sought to acquire or even may have acquired nuclear weapons from Pakistan, orginating in the PRC, to marry up with IRBMs that Saudi Arabia owns.
USA...superpower....it is just like the stock market bubble of BSE....by killing many civilians in afganistan and Iraq...Bush has invested in 1000's of future militants...even if 10 of them have Osama's ability USA will be in the stone Age...
RE:America's investment in aiding terrorism
by Vinod Sailes on Aug 27, 2004 05:29 PM
Replying to Aarthi's comment:
Whether a country is third world or not is not the issue for commenting on terrorism - what troubles humanity as of today is militancy - the root cause of which is "obstinacy" arising out of arrogance & avarice which frustrates a person to take to extreme. Militancy gets its root cause from above evils which ultimately kills the virtue (if any) in a person forcing him to take extreme steps - out of frustration.
Bride burning, road rage etc are just derivatives of that arrogance & greed which ultimately forces an individual to take to extreme steps. A philanthropist does not burn a bride, loot or take up militancy ! So clear your thinking - Aarti !
America's contribution to world peace
by Vinod Sailes on Aug 30, 2004 10:27 AM
Dear Friends:
Reply to Aarthi's comment:
To say that "we cannot hope to be called a civilized society" due to "cases of communal clashes, bride burning etc" is stretching your script too far and making mokery of the 21st century.
During this computer age & God-speed in technology, you - Aarti - have missed out at the basic factor and its causes i.e.- terrorism - which is looming large on the minds of world leaders
How come you have underrated the war in Iraq and judged the whole exercise as "proved wrong" ? An era of suppression and tortures under Saddam Hussain has ended. The hell that went on during the last two decades as also the wrath of the so called Iraqi militants have (I say unfortunately) led even the American soldiers wrongly (in a sense) make merry with the prisoners and US has indeed regretted the episode. But, the War has proved to the world that US (& its allies) have an answer to Heads of State who act in a partisan manner by suppressing the civilians merely to uphold the actions as seemingly right as in the case of Saddam. No you wrong the iraqis who are freed from the clutches and living in peace under the present government.
RE:America's investment in aiding terrorism
by Aarthi on Aug 19, 2004 06:01 AM
Indian is a third world country, we all know that... we cannot hope to be called a civilized society, hence the cases of communal clashes, bride burning etc. But the US is supposed to be "civilized", and supposed to value to human life... but all that has been proved wrong in this war in Iraq.
RE:America's investment in aiding terrorism - How negative is your outlook ?
by Vinod Sailes on Aug 12, 2004 01:14 PM
Dear chum:
When you do not have a proper perception of things around you, it is best that you refrain from commenting on any issue ! This will be the first lesson for people of your wit.
One does not commit suicide by stabbing another or viceversa. If you do have an inkling that militancy is steadily rising, then where is the way out of it. Staying quiet has taught India the lesson for one whole decade ? Militancy is not a question of today's world. What has happened in India - communal clashes, Gujarat riots, murder, road rage, constant thefts, loot and murder of senior citizens, young girls (Oh I forgot to mention the bride burning, rape, dowry greed - are these anything outside militancy ?) - are we any lesser of the lot ? What comment have you to make ?
Half wits are harming the society and instead of giving a proper direction to hastening progress, such elements (you are one as well) blemishing the society.
Panchkula July 29th This expose culled from us investigative naval team ought to convince those around the policy forging group in states that their staunch non-nato ally is capable of wearing various masks; unless they themselves are more than anybody else willing to use a convenient stooge to provide a launching pad for their hegemonic strategies in the Islamic as well as the south asian region...leading to us mayhem and death to their own metro denizens. Dharmendra Goel
Bush just wanted to occupy the oil-field as they have just wanted it to be over years?Just they want to remain the No1 and butcher people and make their desire fufil.But every d... has it's day.
This whole episode was most likely known to ISI and Pakistani Government. the reasons there in goes as follows :- 1. when Pakistan was whole hearted supporting the Taliban regiem then they could not afford to misinform their gardians. 2. the author has rightfully stated that ISI was the backbone of taliban and hence it not being in knowledge of even the out lines of the proposed attacks does not diggest. 3. the objective of pakistan's ISI was to moblise Islamic nations for funding their projects was justified by supporting anti jewish and anti american attacks, the 2 communities most hated by muslims in general.
Why the question even. Definitely yes. I dont think America is unaware of this, but this (Dubya) administration had a larger agenda for which they were willing to pay the "smaller cost". It's a pity that nobody asks questions about the money Omar Sheikh had allegedly wired Atta before the 9/11 operation. Even the 9/11 Commission glosses over this aspect. War against Iraq was nothing to do with WMD and it was on the drawing board even as the administration assumed office. Frankly, the way Pakistan is being rewarded with all the largesse and its nuclear proliferation being given the nod-nod,wink-wink pardon, one really wonders if 9/11 was all really a staged drama. After all, what are the lives of 3000 people when you are playing for larger stakes, a new "world order". Bush is not a moron, he is the facade for the evil trio and the oil mafia that drives this administration. Bush might go but he has already done the damage for India. Musharraf seems to be wagging his tail already and the peace talks seem to be going nowhere. By the time Kerry is ready to get to the White House, Musharraf and his ISI will be masters of the situation.
RE:Did Musharraf know about 9/11
by Ramanathan on Aug 04, 2004 05:43 PM
I think US deserve 9/11 and hope they get some more for their attitude towards Paksitan. What a crap this US is. I have never seen anyone helping the very people who killed his men. People in US lack knowledge abt. outside world who beleive what their govt. says. Things will not get changed unless and until some more of 9/11's happen in US (under the auspices of Musharraf and co.).
