Women should not be over sensitive about such small incidents. Beautiful women bound to get attraction and men will just try their luck. Say no and forget as long as it has not harmed you.
"Knowingly enter the field, suffer initially, bear it and then once you establish, make / repeat these allegations / actuals for publicity. Even in universities, for Ph.ds, same story is repeated as we are below average personnel and want to establish. Even in US, same story even for nominated Judges, Presidents, Senate members, Hollywood and may be in universities for scholarships to external studets. World is fully adulterated, and none eligible to rise a fingure.
Re: Tanushree
by radha vaidya on Sep 28, 2018 10:07 AM
she was ok for lewd scenes , aashik banaye apne but do not want repeat scene in horn ok pleasss , sounds selish more than a victim
Knowingly enter the field, suffer initially, bear it and then once you establish, make / repeat these allegations / actuals for publicity. Even in universities, for Ph.ds, same story is repeated as we are below average personnel and want to establish. Even in US, same story even for nominated Judges, Presidents, Senate members, Hollywood and may be in universities for scholarships to external studets. World is fully adulterated, and none eligible to rise a fingure.
I don't know about other cases, but I can definitely comment on this one.
When this event happened, I had read AND heard lots of reviews and interviews. On the basis of those, I can surely say, that She was over-reacting, and there was a tremendous loss to the production house and the whole unit, because Madam decided to walk out on the set.
Nana Patekar, directors, Ganesh Acharya and others, made statements that the entire fault was of Tanushree, AND Nana Patekar was NOT at fault.
So the bottom line is the WHOLE WORLD is wrong and Madam is correct !!! And she remembers now because of the popularity or #MeToo. A nice short cut to shoot to fame and come back to limelight.
I am NOT a judge to conclude who is right or wrong, but the events at that time, surely stated that it was all because of Her.
"In a television interview, the actress alleged that Patekar got too close to her while performing a dance step, something he was not supposed to do.
She also claimed he added an intimate step and tried to get her to do it."
This is something new that she is saying NOW, but did NOT say when this event happened, instead at that time, she said: She was NOT comfortable with the looks and facial expressions of Nana Patekar.
So you can have your own opinion, but, as far as I am concerned, SHE IS AT FAULT.
