Its always been a fight for creative people and its a shame that the I&B Ministry or the CBFC who certifies any film doesn't have any clear direction either for the filmmakers/artistes or for the law department and people that once its certified by them, there is nothing that should stop it from being screened. Clear directions to the film people and artistes should also be made known that they cannot make this and they cannot make anything in fact which even 1 Indian could be hurt. And then let them declare that there is no democracy or freedom for expression in arts or films. Its no use just shouting against those who then say there is intolerance in India.
What sort of movie title is this Mr. Director? Clearly you want attention by having this title and absolutely aware it will hurt feelings. IS THIS CREATIVITY. IS THIS FREEDOM?? Wondering how sensor board allowed this title!!
I think there is a ooncerted effort by the relgions not native to this country to belittle the culture and G@dheads and derive mileage from it. These people want impose their d(rty minds on others in the name of freedom of speech and expression. It is told that a picture is more powerful than the words, and if one realizes or not, one is more concentrated on actions in a movie than the words good or bad and ultimately it is emulated in the society (good or bad). I think people with these such minds should be taught a lesson and their films shuld never be allowed in theaters so taht they suffer financial losses and learn a leasson that it is for the benefit of the society that one should work.
Title of the film changed to s*** Mariam or s*** f*****a. Then go on showing it. They were really s***. Resulting in to so many cristians and muslims .
Re: Re: Title
by RK gaur on Nov 27, 2017 01:53 PM
you are rt ,french cartoonist try to undermine a religion and they were b****ed,same fate should meet this dirty director
Re: Title
by Sudarshan Nityananda on Nov 28, 2017 09:33 AM
There was a film long ago called Julie. There was no objection to such a title, so why for this movie ?
Re: Re: Title
by Ravi Iyer on Nov 28, 2017 09:43 AM
Julie is not the name of a Goddess you see and there is no adjective in front either! We also had movies with feminine names in the past but not with any adjective.
Re: Why didnt he keep the tite sexxxy Maiyam
by Sudarshan Nityananda on Nov 28, 2017 09:34 AM
There was a film long ago called Julie. There was no objection to such a title, so why for this movie ?
Majority of the public is opposing the film. Even then if the director wants he may screen it at his home for himself and the actors therein. Anyone is not above the public sentiments in democracy.
Re: Respect the public sentiments!!
by deepak yadav on Nov 27, 2017 10:23 AM
public sentiment with majority may be (actually is) ethnic cleansing of minority (read mus)...you will call is democracy?....democracy is not on based on public will..it is totally on law of land...nothing else..and should impact that
Re: Respect the public sentiments!!
by Rakesh Dandekar on Nov 27, 2017 10:39 AM
public sentiments is only showing but once this picture released every one will view in their mobile and pass on regularly. it is publicly released very shortly. people minds are very short dont take any seriousness of this matter.
