firstly I would like to thank rediff for allowing visibility of my post which was blocked intitially. ma'am his last blockbuster was in 2009 and if we forget about media articles his box office success is nothing compared to salman khan, aamir khan. in fact it is closer to hrithik roshan and akshay kumar. yash chopra chose him for darr because the strange role was rejected by aamir khan and all other actors. mr chopra had limited choise and he clearly wanted someone with vulnerability and less muscles. hence the role went to srk. there are rumours that for the next few years he was supported by the underworld in a major way. baazigar was a salman reject, darr and ddlj were rejected by aamir. aziz mirza made raju ban gaya gentleman, yes boss and phir bhi dil hai hindustan and chalte chalte.kuch kuch hota hai was supported by salman and main hoon na, om shanti om were made by farah khan. koyla and pardes were offered to him due to underworld pressure. koyla was originally written with sunny deol in mind. karan arjun had him paired with salman khan although it was offerred to ajay devgun first. srk is a brilliant and charming person who could have been in IIM Ahmedabad. He has used the medium of cinema to reach global audience and his brilliance to market himself globally. however if you say that the industry is not communal, you need to think again
I am sorry, but cant think of any star being compared to Amitabh. He is a highly educated person and comes from an a highly qualified family. Wheras, SRK or Rajnikanth who might be stars but cannot be as dignig=fied as Amitabh in class and persona. Hence, we shouldnot compare Amitabh with any of these stars.
I am sorry, but cant think of any star being compared to Amitabh. He is a highly educated person and comes from an a highly qualified family. Wheras, SRK or Rajnikanth who might be stars but cannot be as dignig=fied as Amitabh in class and persona. Hence, we shouldnot compare Amitabh with any of these stars.
I am sorry, but cant think of any star being compared to Amitabh. He is a highly educated person and comes from an a highly qualified family. Wheras, SRK or Rajnikanth who might be stars but cannot be as dignig=fied as Amitabh in class and persona. Hence, we shouldnot compare Amitabh with any of these stars.
Is it Modi or is it that tolerance of Hindus have been breached. I had read about Rani Padmini in my childhood days. It was a book written by nephew of Rabindranath Tagore. I still remember the passage where it was described how Rani Padmavati or Rani Padmini went for self immolation to preserve her dignity from Alauddin Khilji and his forces and she was followed by entire Rajput women clan.Who says its a mythical character. People's sentiments are associated with it.Tomorrow ,some one will say Ram and Sita are mythological characters and show some objectionable scenes in the name of creative freedom.Remember how Da Vinci Code elicited strong reaction from Christian community. Not a word was uttered then. Why are Hindus always painted as intolerant. What is this nonsense going on. Why wasnt any fuss created when Muslims created an issue over Kamal Hassan's movie Vishwaroopam or when A R Rehman was harassed for scoring music for an Iranian movie on prophet Mohammad because Muslim organisations didnot agree to the portrayal of prophet. Was it not intolerance then ???
We see these comments on facebook, twitter and all becoz people are paid and made to sit on these sites in large numbers to inflame communal hatered by these right wingers in power. Indians in totality are still far from communal and enjoy pluralism.