Though Kshatriya, the problem with Duryodhana was his ego, and for the people who supported him, their loyalty.
But then is it too much of an artistic challenge to remove sections of a song that make it look in public and not within the family I don’t know. For me as a consumer it is less choice at the end of the day.
Bhansali hasn't filled the form clearly. If he were so honest, he should have mentioned and completed formalities 60 days prior to release of the film. Why didn't he do that? And u filmwalas, we all know where ur source of money comes from.
Why talk of financial loss. Bhansali can recover any amount of loss in his next film. But if the sentiments are hurt and there is loss of life, any number of Bhansalis cannot bring it back. Those in favor of film know that others' lives are also precious as you and your family's, so do not bring in money loss into picture.
For the election in Gujarat and Haryana be over - like crooks in film industry we have in politics too - who has more crooks only people have to decide . A murderer from film industry got away -all bast*** we in unison supported him -so do not teach us Mr.Nihalni.
Why not Rajia or Maria instead of Padmavati or Jaichand in place of Allauddin Khilji. First you try to get backing of interested journos then putting pressure on Censor Board. Sentiments of crores of people mean nothing to you.
Re: If it is not a historical film then why historical names
by awaz on Dec 03, 2017 07:52 PM
Your sentiment is a lame excuse, nothing else. You need only an excuse to create trouble everyhere.
Bhansali made film based on joysi the sycophant of khilji who wrote the poem eulogies him...i.e biased view...and now bhansali says his film is fictitious....no one will believe him now...its made to make money by hurting and arousing sentiments.
Re: Whats wrong in film
by Mohammed abdulrasheed on Dec 03, 2017 03:08 PM
Your statement shows who the sycophant is. Jaisi lived in 16th century where as khilji lived in 14th
