Krishna's comedy is monotonous, It's not spontaneous. Krishna invariably overacts. Between the two, I think Kapil was good.
But for me, the best stand-up comedian was
Raju Shrivastav, his expressions, timing, voice modulations was superb & the best thing was his subjects of comedy has variety he can do comedy on anything.
I have watched many episodes of Comedy Nights with Kapil and liked it very much for its team work - Kapil's contribution to it would sum up to 40%. Krushna alone will be able to contribute at least 60% of the show with his better look, expression, his speech, his natural dancing pose, better physical fitness and likely willingness to allow equal share of performance to his co-comedians or actors. Let all such show go on successfully!
Re: Comedy Nights
by ubuntu on Jan 15, 2016 07:23 PM
Comparing Krushna with Kapil is an insult to standup comedy. Kapil is the Amitabh Bachchan of comedy and Krushna only knows how to dance and nothing related to comedy. Comedy night will be dud without Kapil and will be egregious with Krushna in it.
