Shah Rukh Khan though is a very good actor, but as a human being he is a selfish guy. And being oneself and thinking that since I am a superstar its ok to be like that and giving trouble to others in whatever way it is does mean that he doesn't value others as well their time. Its not necessary for a star to be starry in their own way and then finding justification in that. Whether you are a star or President or PM, first you have to be a human being which the likes of Shah Rukh and Salman can never be. All his films only revolves around him and not the character and his movies indirectly glorify him and fortunately he was luckily in the hands of those directors who are not real great directors but fans of Shah Rukh charisma and businessmen who knew glorifying his character will earn them money. He should realise that once his movies go flop, life will go down and which has to happen and nobody can stop that. The next generation may not be eager to know or remember Shah Rukh like this generation doesn't want to know of Dilip Kumar or become his fan.
This is the word which came to my mind as I was reading this article. After the end of the article it got confirmed that he is the most arrogant guy after Rajesh Khanna to have come to film industry. A guy who does not have a minimum courtesy to reply messages or return calls can not be A good human being. SRK should behave like a normal human being before preaching others who are affected by his bad behavior. And yes, he can not play poor man because meaning of acting is to act/to potray somebody else who you are not.Why some actors are called great because they can act like a blind man, a lame man, a beggar , a ferocious villian, an adivasi or any other character which the actor or actresses have newer experienced before. That is why I say Amitabh as great actor because he can act in any role unlike SRK who can only act in romantic movies. By Gods grace he reached such heights and must be thankful to that and behave humanely because with limited acting talents he reached such heights only through luck. Even Rajesh Khanna who was as arrogant as SRK was extremely talented than SRK.
This is the word which came to my mind as I was reading this article. After the end of the article it got confirmed that he is the most arrogant guy after Rajesh Khanna to have come to film industry. A guy who does not have a minimum courtesy to reply messages or return calls can not be A good human being. SRK should behave like a normal human being before preaching others who are affected by his bad behavior. And yes, he can not play poor man because meaning of acting is to act/to potray somebody else who you are not.Why some actors are called great because they can act like a blind man, a lame man, a beggar , a ferocious villian, an adivasi or any other character which the actor or actresses have newer experienced before. That is why I say Amitabh as great actor because he can act in any role unlike SRK who can only act in romantic movies. By Gods grace he reached such heights and must be thankful to that and behave humanely because with limited acting talents he reached such heights only through luck. Even Rajesh Khanna who was as arrogant as SRK was extremely talented than SRK.
Re: Why should Shah Rukh (King) Khan Play the Role of a Poor Lad ??
by Surya Narayan Das on Dec 14, 2016 10:09 AM | Hide message
This Paki_supporter first know how to play.. hammering is not part of acting..
Re: Re: Why should Shah Rukh (King) Khan Play the Role of a Poor
by sridhar nanagiri on Dec 14, 2016 12:01 PM
your beggar looking ajay devgan just knows gimmicks. No akshay kumar, ajay devgan or hrithik roshan can come near to three khans...understand?
Re: Re: Re: Why should Shah Rukh (King) Khan Play the Role of a P
by M S Dhoni on Dec 14, 2016 10:16 PM
but all khan combined can not even come close to AMITABH BACHCHAN :)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Why should Shah Rukh (King) Khan Play the Role of
by pk kh on Dec 15, 2016 11:42 PM
Well said,Mr Sridhar has taken the discussion to communal side but let me clear you that SRK donates for PAK but not for INDIA,he is very mean and arrogant actor who shot to fame from Fauji and Darr.Why people like nanagiri is into Man Worship.He is one of the worse human seen so far.Unlike Akshay who always help people and is down to earth.
Re: Re: Re: Why should Shah Rukh (King) Khan Play the Role of a Poor
by Surya Narayan Das on Dec 20, 2016 11:22 AM | Hide message
A vastardPIG_hiding under a fakeHindu_name as Sridhar nanagiri..madarzaatSuwar
Re: Re: Re: Why should Shah Rukh (King) Khan Play the Role of a P
by CHAKRABORTY I on Jan 20, 2017 05:28 PM | Hide message
hey pakitroll no doubt u were educated in madrassha
