Discussion Board

Box office: Bombay Velvet is a disaster

Total 7 messages Pages | 1
Shaik Bade Saheb
Bombay Velvet
by Shaik Bade Saheb on May 19, 2015 12:19 PM

It's a visual delight to watch Bombay from 1949 to 1970. The screen play is excellent. The only flaw I noticed is why the singers, Raveena and Anushka, though acted well, didn't swing their bodies while singing? The singers in bars in those days used to swing their bodies especially their bosoms and hips rhythematically, sexily rather to say.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
madanmohan siddhanthi
by madanmohan siddhanthi on May 19, 2015 10:07 AM

Support with proof .Reviews by others there are doema dozen .Then collections and occupancy properly checked and proved do not give off the cup remarks

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Naalayak Chhokra
Gabbar is back... below average??
by Naalayak Chhokra on May 19, 2015 12:23 AM

It is running well in the 3rd week too. How can it be below average? No fact checks it seems.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Tejinder Dass
Gabbar below average
by Tejinder Dass on May 18, 2015 09:33 PM

Correct your facts pls.. It has crossed 80 crore mark and that to in the time of IPL is on..
Pls think wisely :-)..

    Forward  |  Report abuse
kanchan sharma
vinod mirani disaster in film Industries
by kanchan sharma on May 18, 2015 09:18 PM  | Hide replies

Bombay Velvet is for History Lover and made one Intelligent effort , people watching it full interest and with 70% capture on Monday

    Forward  |  Report abuse
kanchan sharma
Re: vinod mirani disaster in film Industries
by kanchan sharma on May 18, 2015 09:20 PM
good performance hard work by anushka

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 7 messages Pages: | 1
Write a message