Looks like you have taken "Taken" too artistically and wanted to review it like Haider/Masoom. Although I am yet to watch the film, but if an action film is rated on action and cool stuff, it would be fairer to him (and the readers). I can understand if the film does not live to the artistic standards, but does it entertain from action / drama / cool spy like stuff? Your review does not seem to answer that.
And half a star, come on! We all know Liam Neeson is much better than that.
Re: Taken 3 review
by shrey d on Jan 10, 2015 12:18 AM
Look, this is a Paloma Sharma "review", which means it's in no way an assessment of the film under scrutiny; it's more like an impulsive and thoughtless rant in her journal/diary. Ignore it, and go see the film!
