IF AT ALL REDIFF CARE OF ITS SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY, IT MUST DELETE TABASSUMS ARTICLE AS SHE HAS DIRECTLY/INDIRECTLY CHEATED FOR ADVERTISING THE CHEATER DOCTOR MUNIR KHAN. HOW MANY INNOCENT PEOLE WERE CHEATED BY TABSSUMS PRAISE FOR THE FAKE DOCTORS? DO REDIFF HAVE ANY IDEA? HOW THE CELEBRITY CAN DARE TO ADVERTISE UNQUALIFIED DOCTOR WHO IS NOTHING BUT A QUACK.
IT IS TO BE NOTED THAT INSPITE OF SEVERAL POLICE CASES AND ARREST WARRANTS, EVEN TODAY ALSO THIS QUACK IS CHEATING PEOPLE. THE CHEATER WAS GLRORIFIED BY TABASSUM. THIS ARTICLE MUST BE REMOVED IMMIDIATELY.
by abhay narayan on Jun 27, 2016 01:22 PM
Most unfortunate. Rediff is glrorifying Tabassum who helped the cheater Munit Khan who is nothing but a quack. It seems Rediff has lost its vision of Sociel responsibility. How dare a celebrity can go on praising CONFIRMED QUACK without any qualifications and licence and go on advertising for sucu quack? Do the rediff know how many innocent patients lost money and got differnt health complications due to the quack treatment? Shame on Tabassum.
I too loved Madhubala most dearly though she is just 15-16 years older to me. but she expressed her love to Dilipkumar what to do.. when i seen her in chalti ka nam gadi,that time i was jobless studying in high school or college
You were aptly named as your smile always used to sweep us away. This interview is really good, candid and made me remember my old days. She comes out as intelligent and a very matured woman. She should not rue as to whether she became successful as an adult actress or her son tasted success. She has had illustrious company and is still in hearts of those born in Forties and Fifties.I can't wait for the next part. it is so full of life.
Its hard to believe the statement by Tabassum that she used to earn 7 to 8 lakhs per film in the 50's. And later on she says she used to be paid 70Rs for her show on TV which was in the 70's. Really contrasting income statements.
Re: cant believe that she used to get 7 to 8 lakhs per film in 19
by Rakesh Dandekar on Jun 27, 2016 01:09 PM
it may be 7 to 8 thousand may ait is mis printed as lakh because that time money is very low. I was woking a salary of Rs.100 pm and saving Rs.15 pm. that time cost of living is very low not like today. today we cant get even sing-chana in Rs.1.00 there should not be any penic.
we love our parents till we find other companions.. . then love our companions till we have children and finally love grand children i.e.we had been never responsible and even loyal. Therefore professional courtesies are momentary...