More often and than not, in rediff, especially, these reviewers are either judgmental or prejudiced. Reviews have to be impartial which needs some understanding of Cinema Media. Best eg: Raja Sen, this Palomi whatever.. Seriously, rediff has to retain some good reviewer who know movies and can try to understand what a director is trying to visualize.. If, indeed, she reviewed it even before it was screened in India, its cheating the public - rediff - do something..
Seriously, don't you have a clue that you just can't cut it after all this time?
To being with, the character's name is spelled MIA. Not Miya. Why on earth go through reviewing a film that you didn't enjoy if you can't care enough to get these small details right?!
And your attempts at 'sarcasm' range from stupid to downright lame. The only thing "faux" here is your overbearing confidence of writing a review.
You know a review is total garbage when the reviewer thinks that they're funny. You're not funny, Paloma.
What is funny however, is that, this review was published at 9:32 AM IST, considering there were ZERO advance screenings of this film before today. So, in typical Paloma Sharma fashion, you have "reviewed" yet another film without actually watching it.
It's so easy to concoct a bogus review picking bits and pieces off of reviews from IMDb, Rotten Tomatoes, et al.
Re: Re: Oh, Paloma! you've done it again
by Subroto Neogi on Oct 11, 2014 03:00 PM
You should be grateful to her. If her reviews didn't get published, where would you spew your self-important garbage, Mr know-it-all?
