i dont understand how ambanis agreed to do this film. their own daughter invites SRK in her own chartered flights in NY, (remember the controversy of s t r i p se a r ch i ng of SRK, when USA had to appologize to us). so y did they take Akshay Kumar as hero. Anyway here is my review: The film copied the main idea from Telefon (1977), gave it patriotic look, added dance and sonaxi, and voila. a so called intelligent film is ready.
Pluses: Govinda can still do good comedy. Indian army ppl are averse to using skype, or mobile phones or other tools of communications.
Minus No need for sonaxi or songs n dance. Akshay shd have played the role of that army guy who is killed in the middle while having affair with another armyman's wife. SRK should have played the hero who takes revenge for this. People would have loved it. The role of villain should have been given to John Abraham.
Re: Ambanis are cheaters
by Vedprakash Sharma on Jun 09, 2014 12:16 AM
Seriously! Did you escape from a mental asylum? You make no sense and your filth is overflowing from you stinking mouth! SR PaiKhan, the 50 plus years odl guy, who can kill himself by just jumping off of a small chair, as the main army guy? It would have been classified as a comedy! ROTFLMAO! Imagine this 50 years old potato nosed PaiKhan holding doing those action scence. Budda, would have died while doing it. ROTFLMAO! You can make one movie with the old PaiKhan in the lead and then satisfy yourself, you know what I mean? ;-)
'the endless shots of people walking in Akshay's Special 26' Really? Thats what you thought was going on in S26. And this is a major hissup in Holiday. WOW and MI that you mentioned is regarded one of the most unintentionally hilarious film with one loophole after another. If you got adrenaline rush watching that drivel, then you need to get out a bit more.
Re: is raja sen really a critic or a paid pet?
by Shrish Khunder on Jun 08, 2014 06:34 PM
ok thats a valid point and i agree that Raja sen's review was biased. He must have gotten his bone from u n d e r wo r l d related r a c i s t fr e a k s like Ajay Dvgn who cant tolerate other pplz success.
But then you will also have to agree that if SRK was in Holiday, it would have taken Earth shattering opening. not only that it would have gone on to win awards. SRK or even slaman, aamir saif irfaan fardeen ensure this kind of response from the public. all of them are better than Akshay kumar, they are superior to akshay kumar. akshay kumar is nothing in front of khans on merit. but sometimes he plays dirty games to look like khans. but he is not. i saw holiday in cinema and this is the feedback i got.. ppl wanted SRK in it. SRK rox.
Re: Re: is raja sen really a critic or a paid pet?
by Vedprakash Sharma on Jun 09, 2014 12:18 AM
Seriously! Did you escape from a mental asylum? You make no sense and your filth is overflowing from you stinking mouth! SR PaiKhan, the 50 plus years odl guy, who can kill himself by just jumping off of a small chair, as the main army guy? It would have been classified as a comedy! ROTFLMAO! Imagine this 50 years old potato nosed PaiKhan holding doing those action scence. Budda, would have died while doing it. ROTFLMAO! You can make one movie with the old PaiKhan in the lead and then satisfy yourself, you know what I mean? ;-) WHo did you watch with? With your sleep cell bros? ROTFLMAO!
