Well said, but why everyone is against this movie only???? Is it because the main lead actor Aamir Khan happens to be a Muslim. How convenient is that???
Where were all these people sleeping when Paresh Rawal & even Akshay Kumar did more or less the same in "Oh My God"???? Well, not all but certainly quite many Indians are such racist and biased this is a clear proof of that.
Aamir is not the director or producer of the movie PK. If you have the guts take action against Hirani or Vidhu Vinodh Chopra. Then why them first, why not get "Oh My God" prople prosecuted.
Re: Hypocrisy is not new in India!
by Rationalist on Jan 01, 2015 09:28 AM
OMG criticizes all religions and there were not any great expectations from the makers unlike PK. Besides Aamir Khan the great works only when he is convinced of a script. IF the script were insulting to his religion and the pervertprofit would he have done the film is the subject.
Re: Re: Hypocrisy is not new in India!
by markand desai on Jan 01, 2015 10:14 AM
Further OMG byHindu actor and hindu actor wanted to reform hindu society hence les objectionable . AMIR SHOULD HAVE BY SAME ARGUMENT,DONE SOMETHING FOR MUSLIM SOCIETY? LOTS OF REFORMS ARE REQUIRED IN HIS COMMUNITY.
Re: Re: Re: Hypocrisy is not new in India!
by Rationalist on Jan 01, 2015 10:24 AM
That's right. Everyone should try to reform their own religions. But stone age religions cannot be reformed. That is the problem he tries to reform other religions.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Hypocrisy is not new in India!
by markand desai on Jan 01, 2015 10:31 AM
If someone tries to reform his religion then Amir should support openly the way he is doing now!! then its fine that he is really meansbuisness of reform!1
Even though i was somewhat hurt by the film, we the Hindus, need to show our patience which our culture has demonstrated over ages.
If you think about it, yes, the movie was totally focused on hindu religion, but at the same time, there was no insult to our Gods but only to the fake godmen and the superstitions, which leaders like Mahatma Phule fought against 100 years ago.
Re: Fadnavis is totally anti Hindu
by vivek bansal on Jan 01, 2015 11:07 AM
If he is trying to shield any religion hurter(s)just to show himself has secular,fate of all such will be Congress only.People want equal treatment to all religions,no more insult,ridiculing a particular best religion.
Amir Khan has a political narrative to deliver and he has chosen film as its medium. Indian Constitution grants citizens freedom of expression so Amir is entitled to give out his views. If anyone has noticed, the traitor in 'Sarfarosh' is a Hindu while the patriot is a Muslim. In 'Rang De Basanti' the traitor politician has a saffron flag. These cannot be just coincidence. Since Sensor Board is okay with it we cannot question Amir though we may question the Sensor Board and the Government that runs it. In my opinion learned persons should engage Amir in nationally televised debate on DD and he should not be allowed to get away with a 'hit and hide' policy. Sensor Board, Ministry of I&B and Police Department also should be represented in such debate to the exclusion of religious leaders.
Just ignore the film. These protest make people want to see the movie thereby making it a hit. Instead had the film been ignored, people would not have bothered to watch the film.
if a man said 1500 years ago that he spoke to the almighty, he is no different from the movie's villain tapasvi who is portrayed as a charlatan in the movie
