It was a decent one.. but lets take a look at Argo and zero dark thirty... When in the world are we going to make movies like that... Its not that we are not capable. But projects like 26/11 should be done with so much care and sensitivity not to include filmy dialogues.. like NP's take on Jihad etc... when will the indian movie makers ever make a good attempt
Mahale is Right! Some scenes are missing and most importantly this film should also have a scene where RGV walks with Vilasrao Deshmukh into the Taj Hotel and later he says to media that he has no intention to make any film on terror attacks.
Re: REDIFF GOT MONEYYYYYY
by spenta on Mar 05, 2013 10:25 AM
Mahale was never a senior inspector of DB marg police station . Nagappa Mali was the senior inspector of DB marg in 2008 . Get your facts right before you publish
That drunkard came with Vilasrao deshmukh on the same day when the site was cleared. He had no business to be there and if this film has been made, he sholdnt be profitting from it.
Re: Very angry with RGV
by Chris Martin on Mar 05, 2013 11:43 AM
He is not profitting. RGV said any profit from this film would go to the victims of 26/11.
Re: Re: Very angry with RGV
by S M on Mar 05, 2013 05:40 PM
and you believe him?? He also said he wont be making a movie on 26/11 when he visited the Taj with Deshmukh
Re: Re: Re: Very angry with RGV
by Chris Martin on Mar 05, 2013 09:14 PM
Lets see.. I am not sure if he had said that he wont make a movie when he visited Taj. I dont know about that.
Re: Re: Justificational article by REDIFF
by Chris Martin on Mar 05, 2013 11:45 AM
Ok.. so Mr.. Know it all.. Do you know that any profit in this film would go to the victims of 26/11. I dont see why should not be a film made on 26/11 and highlight the atroicities faced by Indians.
Re: Re: Re: Justificational article by REDIFF
by S M on Mar 05, 2013 05:40 PM
and you believe him?? He also said he wont be making a movie on 26/11 when he visited the Taj with Deshmukh
Re: Re: Re: Re: Justificational article by REDIFF
by Chris Martin on Mar 05, 2013 09:15 PM
Lets see.. I am not sure if he had said that he wont make a movie when he visited Taj. I dont know about that.
A film is a mirror of reality. It is not reality itself.
get a life people. These inaccuracies are trivial. Thay are not important at all.
However, I have to say that the recreation of acts which we have all scene just to cash in on the fear/sensational factors of people is a cheap attempt and was unnecessary.
Re: Re: only senseless people argue on these inaccuracies
by samyakgowda on Mar 04, 2013 07:29 PM
as far as films are concerned, he is senseless. I mean no disrespect. But these inaccuracies are unimportant.
I think this guy is upset that he was not shown as interrogating Kasab first.
Which again, from a story telling point of view is unnecessary and unimportant.
But mind you, I am completely against this film. This film is completely unnecessary.
Re: Re: only senseless people argue on these inaccuracies
by venkatraman balasubramaniam on Mar 05, 2013 10:14 AM
You using such words during arguments shows the culture of your parents and u r forefathers not you
Re: Hi
by m m on Mar 04, 2013 07:07 PM
Part II must be in the minds of Ram to show our commandos clearing Nariman House, then the Trident (hotel) and finally the Taj. That is why he made this film short. Ram should not have shown Mumbai Police throwing stones at the AK-47 holding terrorists as this belittle them though it is meant to be a crude joke (or reality!!!).
