Paloma Sharma, you sound sooo confused during this review. I read you last review on D-Day and it was really good. Here it looked like you didn't like the movie at all but under some obligation you were forced to say some nice words too. The review looks all messed up. Please make up your mind first, if it a Mass entertainer then 1.5 stars is not what should be given here else say clearly that its a bad film!
This movie might have been a success in AP since the crowd there still lives in a timewarp and as long as they get some colourful costumes, acrobatic dances and stunts, double meaning dialogues and midriff shows they will be happy. Rest of the country has moved on long ago... this is a rehash of the second half of Maine Pyar Kiya which came out in 89 sometime???
Who is the reviewer? what are her/his credentials to be called anything above masses? This reviewers subject line itself smacks of bias and therefore to read any further would be an insult to both our intelligence and morals.
If Rediff has an iota of sense of propriety, they will take this review down or ask this reviewer to go take a course in contemporary prose...
Re: For the masses??
by shay mitchell on Jul 21, 2013 02:23 PM
seriously?! YOU are talking ? I watched this movie, and I completely agree with the reviewer. The movie is nothing if not predictable with the occasional slapstick humor which one forgets as soon as they step outside the theater.
Re: Re: For the masses??
by S S on Jul 21, 2013 04:19 PM
And that means it is for the so called masses?? buddy who gives anyone the authority to call someone masses and others classes? I have no issue with the rating of this movie it maybe bad but I have an issue with the reviewer terming something is for someone who is the reviewer to decide that? A review needs to be objective not opinionated , it needs to be specific not generic drivel, It needs to be technical not general. This person has reviewed as if its a class 4 essay