it was to be a review of INKAAR. appears the reviewer is hiddenly love obsessed with Madhur Bhandarkar. check the number of times his name appears in the review of a movie he has no connection with. its not a review or critique. it appears a law paper by a member of national council for women.
Re: what is this review or law paper
by Shrish Khunder on Jan 24, 2013 10:15 PM
She earlier had the same problem with Akshay kumar who kept on appearing in all her reviews for no reason. Suparn Verma should watch out! While he is busy watching Korean Hollywood films to plagiarize, Ms Verma is busy playing tease game with other men.
Have you read the book Disclosure by Micheal Crichton and the movie with the same name with Demi moore and Micheal douglas acting...This is a poor copy of that one...
It is obvious that Sukanya went into the movie with some predefined notion - This is a "film" - A creative piece of story telling - It is not defining "Sexual Harrasment" nor I would assume the Director intended to do that - It was just telling a story of two professionals in an Ad Agency in India -
Perfectly plausible story - I went with a group of friends, and all of us had the same feeling - It is a fabulous film - easily one of Chitrangadha's best - And Arjun Rampal, revealed why he has so much talent, that is not tapped completely -
Sudhir Mishra's done another super work, and I am sure we will see this flick ramping up the award charts in 2013 -
The ending was a "creative" ending - Sukanya probably expected a ending of her choice, and I guess, we have to leave the story tellers, to tell their version here -
All in all, it is this kind of critique, that leaves folks with a feeling of whether to watch or not - So Sukanya should be more careful in her writing, since folks would get influenced by the same -
Please do watch - Slick scenes, lovely narrative, good editing and to top it all, neat dialogues - Crisp and neat -
Re: Sukanya needs a reality check
by Naveen Chandran on Jan 19, 2013 09:50 PM
Thank you my friend - At least i will watch the movie with no expectations - with chameli, then the recent Irfan Khan Chitrangada movie and also Chitrangada Debut movie with Shiny and KK - I was a big fan of Sudhir Mishra - so will certainly watch this one
It is obvious that Sukanya went into the movie with some predefined notion - This is a "film" - A creative piece of story telling - It is not defining "Sexual Harrasment" nor I would assume the Director intended to do that - It was just telling a story of two professionals in an Ad Agency in India -
Perfectly plausible story - I went with a group of friends, and all of us had the same feeling - It is a fabulous film - easily one of Chitrangadha's best - And Arjun Rampal, revealed why he has so much talent, that is not tapped completely -
Sudhir Mishra's done another super work, and I am sure we will see this flick ramping up the award charts in 2013 -
The ending was a "creative" ending - Sukanya probably expected a ending of her choice, and I guess, we have to leave the story tellers, to tell their version here -
All in all, it is this kind of critique, that leaves folks with a feeling of whether to watch or not - So Sukanya should be more careful in her writing, since folks would get influenced by the same -
Please do watch - Slick scenes, lovely narrative, good editing and to top it all, neat dialogues - Crisp and neat -
Re: Sukanya needs a reality check
by on Jan 20, 2013 02:02 AM
it was to be a review of INKAAR. appears the reviewer is hiddenly love obsessed with Madhur Bhandarkar. check the number of times his name appears in the review of a movie he has no connection with. its not a review or critique. it appears a law paper by a member of national council for women.
every sexual harassment case could be slightly different, so was a different case in this story.. why writer went expecting that it will be a story to signify sexual harassment, equal to the magnitude to cases she knows?
