It is quite puzzling like the movie, why two critics in a same site like rediff differ on their award of ranks !! Whom to listen :Sukanya's 3 and Raja's 1 and 1/2. Rediff :Pls appoint only one critic whom you feel impartial.
Too long, too boring,poor music, weak script made it a huge disappointing movie of the year. No robbery, no Comedy, only chasing and stunts. Aamir's acting in second half is the redeeming feature of the movie. This will still make 400 Cr.because the people have no choice. I dont know when these superstars Khans, Roshan, Kumar, Kapoor etc. will deliver real good cenema.
raja sen reviews each movie on the basis of his own movie watching experience of Hollywood...he is right in most cases but completely biased on his own tastes...I watched dhoom...its not great... but its a good one time watch for an average indian audience that does not know who Christopher Nolan is....although I do agree with the his observation on aamir's weird expression throughout the movie...he could have acted better or differently
Raj Sen reviewed 3 Idiots and gave a 2 star to that movie stating that it is a masala movie and Hirani had an off day after giving two hits. Looking back at that review now we realise the calibre of Raja Sen. What is more surprising is that how Rediff could keep him on board as a reviewer when his quality is very poor. Some of the review statements of Dhoom 3 also happens to be personal in nature. It is high time Rediff throws Raja Sen out and bring quality reviewers. There has to be a beanchmark to evaluate the performance of the reviewer or else guys like Raja Sen would go scott free and would continue to write all nonsense. When a new movie releases we frequently look at Rediff site to read the reviews. But if the quality of review is like Raja Sen then we would lose interest in reviews
