Following para is an extract from above article. Someone Please help me understand the meaning of this roller-coaster statement. Is it in English by the way?
"Instead of spreading out her character through a real storyline, he only confuses her and us with hardly fleshed-out if not unnecessary impulses, like working on an art film with a four-time National-Award winning filmmaker (Ranvir Shorey [ Images ] is delightfully grumpy and short-tempered) which never gets completed or a sudden itch to adopt a child. "
bhandarkar is going to go the ramgopal varma way. i used to love rgv movies, but when i look back, i realize that there were simply a couple of formula which were dried out in various contexts. the same is true for bhandarkar. all these film-makers have one or two concepts which they want to use in every movie. very few movie makers try out completely different subjects and still end up making good films
"This is a subject of vast possibilities and sure-shot entertainment but there's nothing innovative about Heroine. It's more of a stylist's dream given the gorgeous range of designer clothes and edgy make-up Kareena sports in the movie"
Sukanya, you mean to say, you can make a better film with the subject line, please join the industry immediately.
Re: Why dont these critics make movies or write screenplays ?
by mihir vaidya on Sep 21, 2012 11:53 PM
no she doesn't mean to say that....anywhere. why should she be able to make a better film or infact any film? she is a film critic and doing her job well.
