Despite years of expensive and ceaseless labour put in by Indian showmen and showwomen (especially the showwomen) to cut the big distance between themselves and the white showmen and women in terms of looks, they dont make an inch of progress, do they?
And such pathetic lack of progress never ever deters the Indian showpeople one bit from their persistent and ever hopeful efforts at trying to look at least a little like the whites, does it?
Re: Raxcial features are so stubbornly indelible, aren't they?
by tinku bhui on Nov 26, 2012 10:28 PM
May be Ashwarya Rai would ring a bell
P.S This was not meant to compare indian women with the whites YOU seem to be obsessed with brother ....but just a happy realisation for you...Good night
Re: Re: Raxcial features are so stubbornly indelible, aren't they
by piri on Nov 26, 2012 10:42 PM
What bell, in your opinion rings when one considers Ms.Rai?
Re: Re: Re: Raxcial features are so stubbornly indelible, aren't
by Vedprakash Sharma on Nov 26, 2012 10:49 PM
It is for those men with bells. Why bother about it, Ms.Piri Piri(a disgusting filthy Mallu cnvrt's name!)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Raxcial features are so stubbornly indelible, are
by piri on Nov 26, 2012 11:14 PM
Offended?
I was just pointing to the fact that most Indian commoners like you refuse to face up to the fact that they are more raxcially linked to the negritoes than to the caucasians as they go on imagining!
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Raxcial features are so stubbornly indelible,
by piri on Nov 28, 2012 12:59 PM
Read about various genome sequencing studies conducted especially in the past decade regarding Indians' genetic roots.
Read the one conducted by the Iowa State University in association with Andhra University or the one conducted by Toomas Kivsild (Read IN FULL) and find out for yourself!
Abuse arises chiefly when ignorance combines with prejudices and the way you use abuse to evade a factual debate is so suggestive of this truism!
Re: Re: Raxcial features are so stubbornly indelible, aren't they
by piri on Nov 26, 2012 10:45 PM
I was also reacting to the gigantic difference in facial features between Ms.Hurley and Ms.Shetty!
Ms.Shetty does ring a bell that brings the black raxce to the mind, not the white, doesn't she?
Re: Re: Re: Raxcial features are so stubbornly indelible, aren't
by Vedprakash Sharma on Nov 26, 2012 10:51 PM
Are you ashamed of looking at your ugly face in the mirror, Ms.Piri "bell less" piri?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Raxcial features are so stubbornly indelible, are
by piri on Nov 26, 2012 11:12 PM
Oh, no little oaf.
I am only talking about the Indian commoners' general inability to come to terms with the fact that they are closely linked to the negrito raxce and not to the caucasian raxce as they would have liked!
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Raxcial features are so stubbornly indelible,
by AKB on Nov 27, 2012 07:29 AM
Ms Poori, i think you suffer from a gigantic inferiority complex and have been brought up in a very inferiority complex environment. None can change u, for u are what u are- a inferior racial piggggg who feels ashamed of self.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Raxcial features are so stubbornly indelible,
by piri on Nov 28, 2012 12:45 PM
What makes you imagine I am 'converted'?
Because I dont agree with what you believe are your 'views'?
What if I am just responding to hype and generalisations?
Why is the average Indian commoner so obsessed with very fair skinned film heroes and heroines? And in addition, such heroes and heroines take great pains to appear more fair - as nearly white and caucasian as possible as the white caucasians themselves, dont they?
And the poor studpid common Indian - so far removed in physical features and skin colour from the 'ideal' hero and heroine he worships and spends so much of his meagre income on - imagines that his heroes and heroines are the personifications of the ultimate ideal of being white and caucasian!
Why keep deluding yourself on the Indians' general attitude of extreme deification of white skin and white features?
Why keep deluding yourself about the Indian commoners' sub-conscious abhorrence of everything that is remotely suggestive of an association with black skin/features?
Why keep on deluding yourself?
Do you imagine that such self-delusion can be hidden from yourself by abusing people?
And oh, I am not a 'convert' (if you mean a mxuxlim or a 'chirxtin')! I am a Kerala hyndu, albeit one who does not practise the religion (or ANY religion)!
The obsession with religious identities is such an unfortunate part of the stuxpid Indian commoner's set-in-granite & heavily generalised views about life & issues!
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Raxcial features are so stubbornly indelible,
by piri on Nov 28, 2012 12:48 PM
What makes you imagine I am 'converted'?
Because I dont agree with what you believe are your 'views'?
What if I am just responding to hype and generalisations?
Why is the average Indian commoner so obsessed with very fair skinned film heroes and heroines? And in addition, such heroes and heroines take great pains to appear more fair - as nearly white and caucasian as possible as the white caucasians themselves, dont they?
And the poor studpid common Indian - so far removed in physical features and skin colour from the 'ideal' hero and heroine he worships and spends so much of his meagre income on - imagines that his heroes and heroines are the personifications of the ultimate ideal of being white and caucasian!
Why keep deluding yourself on the Indians' general attitude of extreme deification of white skin and white features?
Why keep deluding yourself about the Indian commoners' sub-conscious abhorrence of everything that is remotely suggestive of an association with black skin/features?
Why keep on deluding yourself?
Do you imagine that such self-delusion can be hidden from yourself by abusing people?
And oh, I am not a 'convert' (if you mean a mxuxlim or a 'chirxtin')! I am a Kerala hyndu, albeit one who does not practise the religion (or ANY religion)!
The obsession with religious identities is such an unfortunate part of the stuxpid Indian commoner's set-in-granite & heavily generalised views about life & issues!
Re: Raxcial features are so stubbornly indelible, aren't they?
by tinku bhui on Nov 27, 2012 11:48 AM
See Piri , hate begets hate....i only hope you bring some positivity in your thoughts so that YOU become a positive person at the end of the day...Good Luck!!
P.S : I didnt intend on sounding rude with the above remark...so just want to clarify...Regards
Re: Re: Raxcial features are so stubbornly indelible, aren't they
by piri on Nov 28, 2012 12:21 PM
Hate?
Oh no, not at all!
I enjoy responding to hype expressed on this board, such as hype regarding alleged Indian 'achievements', alleged Indian 'blue-bloodedness' (which is what many common middle class and rich Indian commoners believe they have as regards raxcial identity), alleged distinctions between people of different religious, linguistic, caste..categories, etc.
See, if you refer to any DNA sequencing study conducted in the past decade in any comprehensive manner (we can discuss several of these genome sequencing studies if you want), you will understand that the great majority of Indians are raxcially linked to the negrito raxce (or more precisely a mix of Negrito & Australoid - which is again a derivative of the negrito raxce - raxces).
The physical features as well as the skin colour too (in an overwhelming majority of Indians) are more closely related to those identified by genetic scientists/anthropologists as distinctly belonging to the general body of sub-raxces clubbed together as the negrito raxce. Please read up in widely on studies to understand this.
It is true that there is a small section of self-proclaimed scientists in India who labour hard to ignore such genetic evidences and go on and on about ONE SMALL PART of ONE STUDY (conducted by the Swedish geneticist Toomas Kivsild in 2005) to solemnly keep declaring that Indians are a unique raxce by themselves and that no inward migrations occurred before the Mohammedan invasions!
