Discussion Board

Why we love to HATE Shah Rukh Khan


Total 572 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20   Older >   >>
P Narayanan
SRK SHOULD APPOLOGISE
by P Narayanan on May 18, 2012 05:54 PM  | Hide replies

As a hero in films, i do like SRK. At the cricket ground at Mumbai, what he has done cannot be accepted as a right thing, what ever may be his explanations. He is a celibraty and owner of KNR; it does not mean rules are not applicable to him. You cannot blame the guard as what he has done is his duty only. In these circumstances; anybody and everybody can judge, who is wrong. Not only that being a celiberity, he should not have used such words which was uttered by him. It itself establish that he was in a normal condition at that time.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
jatin
Re: SRK SHOULD APPOLOGISE
by jatin on May 18, 2012 05:56 PM
Correct...why he didnt abuse US security personnel who grill him again and again at airport...why to target a poor security man

   Forward   |   Report abuse
jatin
SALUTE
by jatin on May 18, 2012 05:53 PM  | Hide replies

We should salute our security personnel begining from guard to general in army...because of them only we are safe even after haing such notorious neighbours

    Forward  |  Report abuse
miviu
Re: SALUTE
by miviu on May 18, 2012 06:01 PM
I join you, actually most ignored security personnel who did their job.. and bent on saving 'arrogant celebrity'..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
AFTAB SHAIKH
when sharuk did action must be taken, why not when minister had
by AFTAB SHAIKH on May 18, 2012 05:46 PM  | Hide replies

if any minister had done it, than this all wouldnt had happen? Shurukh had that arguments for children not for personal, people loved him when he made chake de, but why people didnt understand the feeling of him, when he argued with the security only for small children, and the security knew that he was sharukh, so thought that he has good chance to come under media without any hardwork. so now we decide what is important , and who is right.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
jatin
Re: when sharuk did action must be taken, why not when minister
by jatin on May 18, 2012 05:49 PM
its india not PAK, only because of strictness of security people India can host IPL, world cup and CWG like events...who told you security men misbehaved his kids

   Forward   |   Report abuse
imran mansuri
Re: Re: when sharuk did action must be taken, why not when minis
by imran mansuri on May 18, 2012 05:51 PM
U should go and ASK Mumbai Police who knew the entire incident and did not any action against SRK.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
miviu
Re: Re: Re: when sharuk did action must be taken, why not when m
by miviu on May 18, 2012 05:58 PM
Can u think person like SRK, can't get away if the incident is minor..... May be his ego had gone up after building 6 packs, he should realize its not body-building competition.. with sober behaveour he would have got more respect.
His reaction after 1/2 a day of incident is enough to say if he was culprit or not..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
jatin
Re: Re: Re: Re: when sharuk did action must be taken, why not wh
by jatin on May 18, 2012 06:01 PM
correct...and why he didnt he show his 6 pack to US security personnel at US airport


   Forward   |   Report abuse
miviu
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: when sharuk did action must be taken, why no
by miviu on May 18, 2012 06:12 PM
he would have comeback pack-less... they are used to such tricks..

Forward   |   Report abuse
miviu
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: when sharuk did action must be taken, why no
by miviu on May 18, 2012 06:22 PM
who knows he would have got rough treatment to even everything, but he may not be coming out because of his stardom..

Forward   |   Report abuse
Amrit Patil
Re: when sharuk did action must be taken, why not when minister
by Amrit Patil on May 18, 2012 05:49 PM
You Are Also Right. Great Thinking.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RKD
Re: when sharuk did action must be taken, why not when minister
by RKD on May 18, 2012 06:01 PM
I have seen many a times..Shah Rukh Khan has become a symbol of attraction of only Musleem community. Only that community supports him like Altaf Shaikh only because he belongs to his community..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
jatin
Pity ON SRK
by jatin on May 18, 2012 05:45 PM

Why he couldnt shout on US security personnel when he was hold at airport second time last month...why so much anger on poor security staff of ground who is doing his duty by not allowing anyone on ground...

    Forward  |  Report abuse
kalyan ghose
SRK
by kalyan ghose on May 18, 2012 05:44 PM  | Hide replies

Agree completely with Sanchari. Mumbaikars are jealous that SRK built his team in Kolkata abd they turned out to be very bad losers when KKr beat MI very badly that evening. And who is Vilasrao Deshmukh who has been a total disaster as chief minister and a non entity as a central minister( of course the father of a B grade movie star!) to ban SRK. He does not even know the rules and norms of IPK. The ground that evening was hired to the franchisee!Only jealous people, including a so called 'superstar' may be behind this now that SRK is moving to Hollywood for a film with Martin Scorses costarring Leonardo DiCaprio!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Amrit Patil
Re: SRK
by Amrit Patil on May 18, 2012 05:47 PM
Ghose Babu Bhalo Bhalo Your R Great. What a information you have.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
scorpio
shahrukh
by scorpio on May 18, 2012 05:44 PM  | Hide replies

I think it is no matter for Shahrukh whether he is allowed or not. He never pays visit to the stadium.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Ravindra Patil
Ban SRK everywhere
by Ravindra Patil on May 18, 2012 05:39 PM

CIA, USA spy agencies, knows better who is SRK, so every time he goes to USA, they deal with him shrudly, and he deserve the same.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
Shivam
why not
by Shivam on May 18, 2012 05:38 PM  | Hide replies

some peoples also loves kasab & osama.........then way not him

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Amrit Patil
Re: why not
by Amrit Patil on May 18, 2012 05:48 PM
You Are Right

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 572 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20   Older >   >>
Write a message