MCA President(full of C charges against him) banning sharukh khan for supporting his children as if he has built d stadium frm his own pocket.Mr president banning for what? If this is so serious then what action has to be taken against you.please think ...
OMG Sanchari Bhattacharya and Rediff, who paid you and how much!? How DARE you write such a biased article and do such blatant propaganda. Is it too much to expect even a sliver of journalistic integrity form the likes of you? This man SRK, is rich beyond the wildest dreams of the common man, living a life of privilege and comfort that most of us cannot even dream of - and you have the audacity of painting him as a victim here!!?? I am ashamed this article exists and you should feel ashamed of yourself for creating such shamelessly sycophantic drivel. SRK has never been a soft target as this article so artlessly insinuates. On the other hand, such celebs are always given a lenient treatment. So when for once SRK's boorish behavior is called out, you are trying to make it sound like he is a victim!? I say let the law take its course and if indeed he has violated the rules of the stadium let him be treated as any ordinary citizen would. Stop trying to influence public opinion by writing such ridiculous tripe.
Re: Poor widdle SRK boo hoo :(
by Jane Doe on May 18, 2012 10:19 PM
Last point - Kabir Khan is SRK's alter ego!? Ha ha hilarious! Where did you learn to write - The Hack School for Yellow Journalism?
Re: Re: Poor widdle SRK boo hoo :(
by rajkamal dubey on May 18, 2012 10:39 PM
Not only sanchari, looking at the comments, it looks like Queen Khan has paid quite a lot of his sycophants
Re: Poor widdle SRK boo hoo :(
by rajkamal dubey on May 18, 2012 10:36 PM
excellently written...he is slowly losing that ability to draw the line between reel and real..this problem is like Alzheimer's...it will only grow worse
the author has hit the nail on the head, Srk is banned by the head of an organisation, who himself is under a cloud of charges of nepotism and corruption. What credibility does such punishment have? No wonder Srk is not concerned by saying his life is not going to chnange. There is absolutely no justification for security personnel for touching young children, girls or boys. Srk was provoked, and I am with him
Khan wants to force his "Celebrity" status on us (common man). It’s all about EGO of a this man (desperate to go on top) and us commoners . Well Mr. Khan, respect is earned .
When Shiv Sena ruined the pitch of the Mumbai stadium some time ago they were not banned. Now when small quarrel happened between Shahrukh and the official, they created hype. This is double standard.
Re: Re: Event at Mumbai Stadium
by Jai Maharashtra on May 18, 2012 09:48 PM
Shiv Sena was penalised for the same......SRK has been misbeaving on regular ocassions....everybody knows how SRK is......He has too much of EGO......no wonder he is always frisked @ US Airports
Re: Re: Re: Event at Mumbai Stadium
by aryan on May 18, 2012 10:12 PM
Many muslims have been frisked at airports even our president Abdul kalam azad was stopped once so it is not an issue and Sharukh is the most mild and charming celebrity ever
Re: Re: Event at Mumbai Stadium
by Ajit Kamble on May 18, 2012 11:43 PM
Abbbey GGaaand000 maadharrCChh0d .... 10 ppp1ggss are fking your M and S1s in DDdonkkkey style. Go and cheer them.
Re: This exactly reason why this mawali
by Ajit Kamble on May 18, 2012 11:45 PM
Abbbey GGaaand000 maadharrCChh0d .... 10 ppp1ggss are fking your M and S1s in DDdonkkkey style. Go and cheer them.
Re: This exactly reason why this mawali
by Ajit Kamble on May 18, 2012 11:45 PM
Abbbey GGaaand000 maadharrCChh0d .... 10 ppp1ggss are fking your M and S1s in DDdonkkkey style. Go and cheer them.
Re: This exactly reason why this mawali
by Ajit Kamble on May 18, 2012 11:46 PM
Abbbey GGaaand000 maadharrCChh0d .... 10 ppp1ggss are fking your M and S1s in DDdonkkkey style. Go and cheer them.
