What security,when anti social elements diggs the pitch at Mumbai what the security man was doing but when SRK comes to the field that is illegal. What a democracy in India.
Re: About handling with SRK
by Ramesh Roy on May 18, 2012 04:06 PM
Even Bhgat sing has bombed the parliment,Do you say he is a anti social element?.If Shivasena dug the pitches,they have valid point to make,even its violence? You cant compare it with SRK,s arrogace.
Re: Re: Re: About handling with SRK
by Argumentative Indian on May 18, 2012 04:17 PM
Bhagat Singh is one of India's most respected freedom fighters. He had a chance to escape, after his rebellion against the British, but he decided to stand and face the law, like a man, because he wanted to set an example for future generations of Indians.
The Shiv Sena is famous, for those both old enough and with a long enough memory, for har*as*s&&ing Tam*il$#s in Mumbai in the 1970s. The founder's nephew is famous for har*as*s&&ing Bi(*har)is in the 2000s.
I am glad you have revealed your true selves, one by comparing Bhagat Singh to such elements and the other by appreciating the point.
Ramesh, I'm just curious, which part of India are you from? Ramesh is a common Marathi name, Roy, a common Bengali surname. There are conjectures that come to mind, you know.
Re: Re: Re: Re: About handling with SRK
by Ramesh Roy on May 18, 2012 04:22 PM
Why the people from other states eating the resources of a particular state?
If Kashmiris are right about them,then Marathis are also right about them.
Ramesh and Roy are common Malayali names also.understand
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: About handling with SRK
by Argumentative Indian on May 18, 2012 04:41 PM
So you are a person with two common Malyali names, Ramesh and Roy and you ask, "Why the people from other states eating the resources of a particular state?" That's ironical.
By the way, genius, which Kashmiris are right, the one's that threw out the Kashmiri Pandits? I thought they were called separatists and terrorists, are THEY your inspiration? Else are you referring to article 356, which is another name for Appeasement?
All the stars who have expressed their voices are no more to be called as stars/celebrities, because of their cheap ways of support extending to their colleague who erred. Dont play cheap tricks as u stars do in reel life.
Re: Cheap
by Deepak Trivedi on May 18, 2012 04:07 PM
They move around with few Hatta Katta security guards. They can say, leave them in 3 tier reservation compartment and they will come to know who the real toughie is.
anybody would have done, they way SRK did. Anybody could be irrational, so can be SRK. Assuming anybody was not allowed to the area accessed by kids, Security man would have done same to anybody's kid. I can expect security person to be tired during duty and do not expect he to be soft spoken during such time. At same time any parent will not be soft spoken in such a time. Nobody can be at real fault and actually both can be at fault. It depends how we see it. Just that moment was bad and such things happen spontaneously. We expect celebrity to be very careful in public speaking, same time few people are anti-celebrity type. In all not a much deal--spontaneous bad moment that happens in everybody's life.
Re: Re: Spontaneous
by Jitender Madan on May 18, 2012 04:48 PM
Yes you are correct that way that SRK action was anti-law. But such trivial anti-law things most of us do one or other time. We rationalize our irrationals and when it comes to others we point out their irrationals. Issue is just as small as happens with anybody.
